search for: offlineness

Hi, had samba 2.1.?? version and Win2k running for some time and offline folders worked just fine. But recently I installed SP2 on Win2k and did a samba upgrade to 2.2.3 and now the offline folders do not work any more. Everything is fine until I go offline, */CSC/ contains my offline files and everything seems fine, but when being offline I always get access denied messages when accessing

On Thu 19-09-19 16:22:25, David Hildenbrand wrote: > virtio-mem wants to allow to offline memory blocks of which some parts > were unplugged, especially, to later offline and remove completely > unplugged memory blocks. The important part is that PageOffline() has > to remain set until the section is offline, so these pages will never > get accessed (e.g., when dumping). The pages

On Thu 19-09-19 16:22:25, David Hildenbrand wrote: > virtio-mem wants to allow to offline memory blocks of which some parts > were unplugged, especially, to later offline and remove completely > unplugged memory blocks. The important part is that PageOffline() has > to remain set until the section is offline, so these pages will never > get accessed (e.g., when dumping). The pages

On Wed 16-10-19 14:50:30, David Hildenbrand wrote: > On 16.10.19 13:43, Michal Hocko wrote: > > On Thu 19-09-19 16:22:25, David Hildenbrand wrote: > > > virtio-mem wants to allow to offline memory blocks of which some parts > > > were unplugged, especially, to later offline and remove completely > > > unplugged memory blocks. The important part is that

On Wed 16-10-19 14:50:30, David Hildenbrand wrote: > On 16.10.19 13:43, Michal Hocko wrote: > > On Thu 19-09-19 16:22:25, David Hildenbrand wrote: > > > virtio-mem wants to allow to offline memory blocks of which some parts > > > were unplugged, especially, to later offline and remove completely > > > unplugged memory blocks. The important part is that

On Wed 16-10-19 16:14:52, David Hildenbrand wrote: > On 16.10.19 16:03, Michal Hocko wrote: [...] > > But why cannot you keep the reference count at 1 (do get_page when > > offlining the page)? In other words as long as the driver knows the page > > has been returned to the host then it has ref count at 1. Once the page > > is returned to the guest for whatever reason it

On Wed 16-10-19 16:14:52, David Hildenbrand wrote: > On 16.10.19 16:03, Michal Hocko wrote: [...] > > But why cannot you keep the reference count at 1 (do get_page when > > offlining the page)? In other words as long as the driver knows the page > > has been returned to the host then it has ref count at 1. Once the page > > is returned to the guest for whatever reason it

On Wed 16-10-19 15:45:06, David Hildenbrand wrote: > On 16.10.19 13:43, Michal Hocko wrote: > > On Thu 19-09-19 16:22:25, David Hildenbrand wrote: > > > virtio-mem wants to allow to offline memory blocks of which some parts > > > were unplugged, especially, to later offline and remove completely > > > unplugged memory blocks. The important part is that

On Wed 16-10-19 15:45:06, David Hildenbrand wrote: > On 16.10.19 13:43, Michal Hocko wrote: > > On Thu 19-09-19 16:22:25, David Hildenbrand wrote: > > > virtio-mem wants to allow to offline memory blocks of which some parts > > > were unplugged, especially, to later offline and remove completely > > > unplugged memory blocks. The important part is that

On 18.10.19 10:15, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Wed 16-10-19 16:14:52, David Hildenbrand wrote: >> On 16.10.19 16:03, Michal Hocko wrote: > [...] >>> But why cannot you keep the reference count at 1 (do get_page when >>> offlining the page)? In other words as long as the driver knows the page >>> has been returned to the host then it has ref count at 1. Once the

On 16.10.19 15:45, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Wed 16-10-19 14:50:30, David Hildenbrand wrote: >> On 16.10.19 13:43, Michal Hocko wrote: >>> On Thu 19-09-19 16:22:25, David Hildenbrand wrote: >>>> virtio-mem wants to allow to offline memory blocks of which some parts >>>> were unplugged, especially, to later offline and remove completely >>>>

On 16.10.19 13:43, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Thu 19-09-19 16:22:25, David Hildenbrand wrote: >> virtio-mem wants to allow to offline memory blocks of which some parts >> were unplugged, especially, to later offline and remove completely >> unplugged memory blocks. The important part is that PageOffline() has >> to remain set until the section is offline, so these pages

Package: xen-utils-3.0 Version: 3.0.2+hg9656-1 Severity: normal My setup is a basic one. No changes to the /etc/xen/* files. Network in a domU works perfectly fine. But, after shutdowning a domU, I can see the following lines in /var/log/debug: May 6 10:31:45 vaio logger: /etc/xen/scripts/vif-bridge: offline XENBUS_PATH=backend/vif/18/0 May 6 10:31:46 vaio logger: /etc/xen/scripts/vif-bridge:

Hi All, I've been running a Samba 3.4.0 on Ubuntu 9.10 for over a year at a friend's office and it has been extremely stable. But I've suddenly hit a scenario where Windows 7 clients can no longer properly sync the main share as 'Offline Files' I found it highly unreliable under Vista Business, then Win7Pro seemed to work much better; but suddenly I am finding that

On Fri 18-10-19 10:50:24, David Hildenbrand wrote: > On 18.10.19 10:15, Michal Hocko wrote: > > On Wed 16-10-19 16:14:52, David Hildenbrand wrote: > > > On 16.10.19 16:03, Michal Hocko wrote: > > [...] > > > > But why cannot you keep the reference count at 1 (do get_page when > > > > offlining the page)? In other words as long as the driver knows the

On Fri 18-10-19 10:50:24, David Hildenbrand wrote: > On 18.10.19 10:15, Michal Hocko wrote: > > On Wed 16-10-19 16:14:52, David Hildenbrand wrote: > > > On 16.10.19 16:03, Michal Hocko wrote: > > [...] > > > > But why cannot you keep the reference count at 1 (do get_page when > > > > offlining the page)? In other words as long as the driver knows the

On 16.10.19 16:03, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Wed 16-10-19 15:45:06, David Hildenbrand wrote: >> On 16.10.19 13:43, Michal Hocko wrote: >>> On Thu 19-09-19 16:22:25, David Hildenbrand wrote: >>>> virtio-mem wants to allow to offline memory blocks of which some parts >>>> were unplugged, especially, to later offline and remove completely >>>>

On Mon 02-03-20 14:49:36, David Hildenbrand wrote: > virtio-mem wants to allow to offline memory blocks of which some parts > were unplugged (allocated via alloc_contig_range()), especially, to later > offline and remove completely unplugged memory blocks. The important part > is that PageOffline() has to remain set until the section is offline, so > these pages will never get

Hi all, I had posted about MCA support for Intel64 before. It had only a function to log the MCA error data received from hypervisor. http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2008-09/msg00876.html I attach patches that support not only error logging but also Page Offlining function. The page where an MCA occurs will offline and not reuse. A new flag ''PGC_reserved''

On Thu 19-09-19 16:22:27, David Hildenbrand wrote: > virtio-mem wants to offline and remove a memory block once it unplugged > all subblocks (e.g., using alloc_contig_range()). Let's provide > an interface to do that from a driver. virtio-mem already supports to > offline partially unplugged memory blocks. Offlining a fully unplugged > memory block will not require to migrate