search for: officemates

Timo, This might be a bit vague, but I have noticed that rc19 seems to have broken the read/unread/reply flags in imap. My officemate has had problems with messages that are read and marked as read then mysteriously get remarked as unread the next time email is checked. I've had problems where I reply to a message and it does not get marked as "answered". We didn't see this

well, top-of-branch lldb uses this code, that's how I found it. Do you mean libc++'s demangler? FYI when I said 14+% (and now it's 17%), I mean the overall performance of starting lldb, not just the demangler itself. It's probably several times faster now with this change (https://reviews.llvm.org/D32500) On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 12:19 PM, Vedant Kumar <vsk at apple.com>

Hi- Here at Columbia Unix Systems Group we experienced difficulty getting tftpd-hpa to build on certain systems (including Debian Woody), and after investigation, my officemate Lev discovered that it is a problem with the autoconf script, not the source code for the application itself. Perhaps others will be helped by this info... Good luck! Erik Dykema Sent by lev at columbia.edu on

...rting lldb, not just the demangler itself. It's probably several > times faster now with this change (https://reviews.llvm.org/D32500) > > Do you know what the llvm policy is on using TLS in library code? I can't > find any mention of this in the programmer's manual, and my officemates > don't know either. > Both libcxx and libcxxabi use __libcpp_tls_*() functions of the threading API [2] (which call pthread functions on most platforms) for thread-local storage needs. IIRC thread_local is not implemented across all the platforms that llvm support. If the idea is to im...

...just the demangler itself. It's probably several >> times faster now with this change (https://reviews.llvm.org/D32500) >> >> Do you know what the llvm policy is on using TLS in library code? I can't >> find any mention of this in the programmer's manual, and my officemates >> don't know either. >> > > Both libcxx and libcxxabi use __libcpp_tls_*() functions of the threading > API [2] (which call pthread functions on most platforms) for thread-local > storage needs. IIRC thread_local is not implemented across all the > platforms that llv...

> On 2014 Oct 16, at 22:09, Sean Silva <chisophugis at gmail.com> wrote: > > Dig into this first! This isn't the right forum for digging into ld64. > In the OP you are talking about essentially a pure "optimization" (in the programmer-wisdom "beware of it" sense), to "save" 2GB of peak memory. But from your analysis it's not clear that

My first computer was a Mac (SE30) but it was also my last so I am not without appreciation of Apples wonderful aptitude for design. Without starting a flame-fest why do so many ruby and rails developers use a Mac ? It seems to be a commonality within the ruby and RoR community. Especially laptops. The first ruby users group meeting I attended was about 50% Macs (or so it seemed to me - I

Dear Community, I have been using two types of survival programs to analyse a data set. The first one is an R function called aftreg. The second one an STATA function called streg. Both of them include the same analyisis with a weibull distribution. Yet, results are very different. Shouldn't the results be the same? Kind regards, J -- View this message in context: