search for: offficialish

...may be confusing offline operation with private branches. They are not the same. Some quick searching reveals that one or two SVN developers may be considering developing a distributed SVN. That would indeed be welcome and would alleviate a lot of issues. Unfortunately I can't find anything offficialish that indicates the idea is being persued. It also looks to be two years away, at least, given some rather hand-wavey predictions of when stuff could happen, if approved. Admittedly, this was a very quick search. If you have pointers, that would be very helpful. >> Not true. SCM support m...

On Sep 8, 2011, at 9:13 PM, David A. Greene wrote: > Bill Wendling <wendling at apple.com> writes: > >>> In other words, svn is not a distributed SCM. It has long struck me as >>> odd that a project whose license encourages private copies would stick >>> with an SCM that has no support for keeping such copies. >>> >> It's my

Bill Wendling <wendling at apple.com> writes: >> In other words, svn is not a distributed SCM. It has long struck me as >> odd that a project whose license encourages private copies would stick >> with an SCM that has no support for keeping such copies. >> > It's my understanding that the upcoming new version of SVN will have > off-line commits available.

...ation with private > branches. They are not the same. > > Some quick searching reveals that one or two SVN developers may be > considering developing a distributed SVN. That would indeed be welcome > and would alleviate a lot of issues. Unfortunately I can't find > anything offficialish that indicates the idea is being persued. It also > looks to be two years away, at least, given some rather hand-wavey > predictions of when stuff could happen, if approved. > > Admittedly, this was a very quick search. If you have pointers, that > would be very helpful. > >...