search for: offended

Hi all, I am taking this over from r-help (see http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.r.general/273985). I experience a segfault when calling gplots::heatmap.2(), but only when certain other packages are loaded. I am not sure for the correct place to send this bug report. Should I send it to the package maintainers directly? If R-help is the wrong place, please feel free to direct me to

Ein eingebundener Text mit undefiniertem Zeichensatz wurde abgetrennt. Name: nicht verf?gbar URL: <https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/attachments/20130304/62581e97/attachment.pl>

The basic idea of tattle (http://www.securiteam.com/tools/5JP0520G0Q.html) is that it will go through your /var/logs/messages to find brute force attack attempts on your machine via ssh. It then looks up the abuse records and emails the network owners about the attack. It worked well until the log format changed a little when I updated last and it broke. So, as an exercise in learning ruby and

Hi, I'm just learning R and am encountering some unexpected results following a guide on the internet. If anyone can help that would be great - I think it is something about the way the data has been read in! I've read a coma delimited text data file that was saved from excel: > jacs.data <- read.table("/Users/natha/Desktop/JACSdata2.txt", header=TRUE, >

Hi all, I experience a segfault when calling gplots::heatmap.2(), but only when certain other packages are loaded. I am not sure for the correct place to send this bug report. Should I send it to the package maintainers directly? If R-help is the wrong place, please feel free to direct me to the correct one. I am on debian (testing) linux 64 with the binary R distribution from the

Hi all, I experience a segfault when calling gplots::heatmap.2(), but only when certain other packages are loaded. I am not sure for the correct place to send this bug report. Should I send it to the package maintainers directly? If R-help is the wrong place, please feel free to direct me to the correct one. I am on debian (testing) linux 64 with the binary R distribution from the

I recently upgraded to build 2448. After doing so I noticed the "Statistics" and "Settings" buttons associated with the GUI interface no longer aligned correctly on the Index Page. A review of the header.html code revealed an offending <br> on line 18. Removing the <br> corrected the alignment problem. The old code read as; <table

...and internal one even). This is a very strong > cultural point in many countries, including Brazil. The stronger two > people can offend each other and shrug, the stronger their bond is. Just for the sake of completeness, there are four main cases: 1. I interact with X outside LLVM, Y gets offended. The code has no part in this whatsoever. 2. I interact with Y outside LLVM, Y gets offended. The code has no part in this whatsoever. 3. I interact with Y outside LLVM, *about* their ability to perform as an LLVM developer, Y gets offended. The code *may* have something to do about it, but as yo...

...de. >> >> I particularly like "Do not make it personal. Do not take it >> personally.". It means *so* much in such a short sentence. > > Agreed! No offense to the FreeBSD CoC, but I really dislike the line “Do not take it personally”. Quite often when someone is offended, the offender will justify their statements by saying “You are just taking it personally”. I find this frequently used towards women (not saying this community necessarily). I would prefer this not used in our CoC. -Tanya

Hi Ron, YES you are correct i am getting tons a day and opend a ticket at microsoft site but didnt get any reply upto now. Recent days i got an email from RAV antivirus domain name ends with "br" saying that one of their server caught the email has antivirus and my email id is in the list too as i know i donno any single member of bunch of email adddress, some are

I have been retooling an S4 class definition to include another slot and have found that the methods::validObject function (defined in methods/R/SClasses.R) in R-devel throws an error that isn't caught internally (and thus not controllable by 'test' argument) when retrieving a non-existent slot. The offending line of code is shown below: > validObject function (object, test =

Hi guys Though being a mere user, - as opposed to an expert - in many long years of ssh in my use this, is new: -> $ ssh box5.proxmox.mine hostname -i 10.3.1.78 -> $ ssh box5 hostname -i Warning: the RSA host key for 'box5' differs from the key for the IP address '10.3.1.78' Offending key for IP in /root/.ssh/known_hosts:2 Matching host key in /etc/ssh/ssh_known_hosts:2

I am hoping for some assistance with formatting a large text file which consists of a series of individual records. Each record includes specific labels/field names (a sample of 1 record (one of the longest ones) is below - at end of post. What I want to do is reformat the data, so that each individual record becomes a row (some cells will have a lot of text). For example, the column

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=870 Summary: Iptables cannot block outbound packets sent by Nessus Product: iptables Version: 1.4.x Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: Ubuntu Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: iptables AssignedTo: netfilter-buglog at lists.netfilter.org

--On Monday, January 01, 2024 1:01 PM +0100 lejeczek via CentOS <centos at centos.org> wrote: > -> $ ssh box5.proxmox.mine hostname -i > 10.3.1.78 > > -> $ ssh box5 hostname -i > Warning: the RSA host key for 'box5' differs from the key for the IP > address '10.3.1.78' > Offending key for IP in /root/.ssh/known_hosts:2 > Matching host key in

This falls into the category of "wonder if anyone''s done this"? The site I''m working on now has affiliate sponsors who provide link HTML. Almost all of it violates some W3C spec for XHTML, the primary offenders being capitalized tag names and unclosed tags like IMG. They also include ampersands as query-string separators, which also offends the W3C Validator. Has

...make it personal. Do not take it > >>> personally.". It means *so* much in such a short sentence. > >> > >> Agreed! > > > > No offense to the FreeBSD CoC, but I really dislike the line > > “Do not take it personally”. Quite often when someone is offended, > > the offender will justify their statements by saying “You are just > > taking it personally”. I find this frequently used towards women > > (not saying this community necessarily). > > I'd agree, "Do not take it personally" could in certain elocutions >...

Is there a way to listen on port 25 for repeated dictionary attacks to harvest email address and blacklist that Ip with shorewall? Thanks, Mike

On 5 May 2016, at 12:14, Charles Davis via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > The last sentence of the third paragraph bothers me: > >> In addition, violations of this code outside these spaces may affect >> a person's ability to participate within them. > ​This essentially gives the committee carte blanche to police our thoughts no matter where we

...they're wearing. Doing so is the most classic form of prejudice. I personally do not see this as the role of the CoC, and from my conversations with Chandler and others on this list and the review, this is not what they are thinking either. I'd rather deal with offenders *after* they have offended than risking have my prejudice affect the quality of the tools I build. It would also show how efficient our process is against harassment. cheers, --renato