search for: odwyer

It sounds like we need to get someone from the Foundation (chandlerc@, lattner@, tanya@, someone else?) to reach out to them offline about this. On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 11:23 AM Arthur O'Dwyer <arthur.j.odwyer at gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 2:19 PM Tom Stellard via cfe-dev < > cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> On 03/20/2019 10:41 AM, Zachary Turner wrote: >> > >> > On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 12:00 PM Tom Stellard via lldb-dev < >> lldb...

...reach out to GitHub directly about this, but I still > think we need some kind of contingency plan in case pre-receive hooks > or even a new kind of branch protection won't be an option for us. > > -Tom > >> On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 11:23 AM Arthur O'Dwyer <arthur.j.odwyer at gmail.com <mailto:arthur.j.odwyer at gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 2:19 PM Tom Stellard via cfe-dev <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote: >> >> On 03/20/2019 10:41 AM, Zachary Turner wrote...

On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 2:24 PM John McCall via cfe-dev < cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > On 4 Dec 2018, at 13:16, Sanjoy Das wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 3, 2018 at 11:49 PM John McCall jmccall at apple.com wrote: > > Piotr's proposal unfortunately doesn't give us a good name for the class > of optimizations that require being listed in supported_optimizations. >

...The only reason to use ADCX or ADOX is when you want to carefully manage the flags to have two interleaved dependency chains. But that would require a special analysis to determine when to do that and we don't have that. ~Craig On Mon, Dec 31, 2018 at 1:21 PM Arthur O'Dwyer <arthur.j.odwyer at gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Dec 30, 2018 at 4:46 PM Paweł Bylica <chfast at gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi Arthur, Craig, >> >> Thanks for you comments about GCC/Clang intrinsics. I never considered >> using them, but they might be better alternative to inline...

On 03/20/2019 10:41 AM, Zachary Turner wrote: > > > On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 12:00 PM Tom Stellard via lldb-dev <lldb-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:lldb-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote: > > Hi, > > I would like to follow up on the previous thread[1], where there was a consensus > to disallow merge commits in the llvm github repository, and start a

[Bcc: Chris Lattner, who's listed in the "Written by"; the doc doesn't have a maintainer listed] I was reading http://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html today and found some errors (or at least places where the text could be clearer). This is *NOT* an exhaustive reading; I'm just reporting the bugs I found in a casual reading of the intro and skimming the rest. I'm operating on