search for: odelreym

> > > > >Please remove the SO_RCVBUF and SO_SNDBUF entries. > > >Oh, that's ancient. Do you have any possibility to move to > > >"security=user"? > > The smb.conf file was inherited from HP-UX system. Ok, > > I'll remove them > > > > >Did you try "posix locking = no"? That is mostly criticial

...89 504 DENY_NONE 0x81 RDONLY NONE /opt/srv007/app/mofis/datos historico Mon Feb 9 18:06:54 2015 50938 504 DENY_NONE 0x81 RDONLY NONE /opt/srv007/app/mofis/datos historico Mon Feb 9 18:08:27 20 2014-12-31 9:44 GMT+01:00 Nacho del Rey <odelreym at gmail.com>: > Hi Volker > > Finally I loaded the following configuration in our test environment > > [global] > > deadtime = 60 > > keepalive = 10 > > > [dossiers] > > > locking = Yes > > ; If yes, turns on by...

...ive in global section Yesterday we did a bunch of tests and, for the moment, it seems to run properly Thanks for your clue I will update this issue as soon as I will confirm the solution is permanent Kind regards and have a happy new year Nacho. 2014-12-17 8:48 GMT+01:00 Nacho del Rey <odelreym at gmail.com>: > >> > >Please remove the SO_RCVBUF and SO_SNDBUF entries. >> > >Oh, that's ancient. Do you have any possibility to move to >> > >"security=user"? >> > The smb.conf file was inherited from HP-UX system...

Hi Volker Unfortunately I didn't keep this information but fd=14 now (samba pids) points to [PRO] [root at pf3il0024 ~]# for i in `ps -ef | grep smbd| grep -v grep| awk '{print $2}'`; do ls -la /proc/$i/fd/14; done lrwx------ 1 root root 64 Feb 10 21:16 /proc/3238/fd/14 -> /var/lib/samba/locking.tdb lrwx------ 1 root root 64 Feb 1 01:33 /proc/18405/fd/14 ->

Ok, it is becoming a nightmare ;-) Last question Volker Is it possible the problem comes from a network device? At job, we have been suffering problems with a F5 Load Balancer. It seems that, randomly, it sets the transmission frame to 0 bytes during a while and routing services don't work very well It is planned that this F5 will be upgraded next week to solve these problems Do you think

The symptom is that the windows process which is accessing the samba share hangs Also, if you try to open the same share (you can do the connection) to see the files, the ls command hangs The other samba shares don't be affected at all, they work ok So the only thing you can do is a reload/restart to resume operations Nacho. 2015-02-11 11:55 GMT+01:00 Volker Lendecke <Volker.Lendecke at

Hi there In an Oracle RAC cluster using ACFS (as file-system) where we have a samba server for sharing files to windows clients, we are suffering a strange issue, from time to time, which it causes the Windows clients lock for a while (10 min or a bit more) or even indefinitely when they are working with the share resource, and sometimes we have to re-start the samba service to come back to

Hi again Volker (& list) I think I am very closer of the problem. Look at this please # A file is deleted => OK [2015/03/06 07:31:45.359108, 2] smbd/open.c:704(open_file) expl opened file PRENSA_Avance1_20150306_070500.pdf read=No write=No (numopen=1) [2015/03/06 07:31:45.359145, 5] smbd/oplock.c:92(set_file_oplock) set_file_oplock: granted oplock on

Hi there Yesterday at job we had a poltergeist with radius + winbind & samba in a linux box with authentication against an Active Directory (Windows 2012) The AD is formed by 3 windows servers. The linux box has a connection established against one of them thru port 445. Then this server downs and a bunch of messages like the following are shown in /var/log/messages May 19 16:40:59

Hi there In an Oracle RAC cluster using ACFS (as file-system) where we have a samba server for sharing files to windows clients, we are suffering a strange issue, from time to time, which it causes the Windows clients lock for a while (10 min or a bit more) or even indefinitely when they are working with the share resource, and sometimes we have to re-start the samba service to come back to

Hi Angel and many thanks for your answer The application still sending & receiving data .- strace over the application: write(1, "\33[1;1H\237#SF \234", 44) = 44 <--it was sent from the application to the terminal, but ssh didn't received this string read(0, "\10", 1024) = 1 <- the client remained sending data and it

Hi list At job we have an old C program which works with industrial hand terminals from Honeywell. That terminal has its own ssh/telnet client to connect to a linux redhat 6.6 server (openssh-server-5.3p1-104.el6_6.1.x86_64). Once it is connected to the linux box (using a certain user), a C program is launched by the bash shell with the following parameters export TERM=vt200 stty raw icrnl

Hi Volker and many thanks for your response According to your questions >Please remove the SO_RCVBUF and SO_SNDBUF entries. >Oh, that's ancient. Do you have any possibility to move to >"security=user"? The smb.conf file was inherited from HP-UX system. Ok, I'll remove them >Did you try "posix locking = no"? That is mostly criticial >if