search for: oddsratios

Here is a working snippet. library(epitools) mat <- matrix(c(10,15,60,25,98, 12,10,70,28,14, 9,11,68,10,12 ,8,13,20,11,58) ,ncol=2) colnames(mat) <- c("treatmentA","treatmentB") row.names(mat) <- paste("Cond",rep(1:10,1)) dimnames(mat) <- list("Condition" = row.names(mat), "instrument" = colnames(mat)) > mat instrument

Here is a working snippet. library(epitools) mat <- matrix(c(10,15,60,25,98, 12,10,70,28,14, 9,11,68,10,12 ,8,13,20,11,58) ,ncol=2) colnames(mat) <- c("treatmentA","treatmentB") row.names(mat) <- paste("Cond",rep(1:10,1)) dimnames(mat) <- list("Condition" = row.names(mat), "instrument" = colnames(mat)) > mat instrument

Hello, I have a loop with 1000 repetitions which includes OR computation of an exposure factor and outcome. I compute OR like this: t<-table(exposure,outcome) oddsratio(t)$measure["estimate"] This gives me the estimates for exposure=0 and exposure=1 but exposure=0 is the reference group and i need only the estimate for exposure=1. I specified a matrix OR with 3 columns (for OR

At work after updating to R 2.5 I get an error using epitab from package epitools, when at home (R 2.4) I get no error. Could someone help me? Thanks Pietro Bulian Servizio di Onco-Ematologia Clinico-Sperimentale I.R.C.C.S. Centro di Riferimento Oncologico Via Franco Gallini 2 33081 Aviano (PN) - Italy phone: +39 0434 659 412 fax: +39 0434 659 409 e-mail: pbulian at cro.it (at work)

Hi, We're using stats4 for a logistic regression. The code is chdreg.logit2 <- glm(chd ~ age + sex, family = binomial) summary(chdreg.logit2) oddsratios <- coef(chdreg.logit2) exp(oddsratios) # Calculate model predicted values pred <- predict(chdreg.logit2,type="response") The glm part runs fine, and up to now so has the predict function. However, now we're getting the following error Error in function (classes, fdef, mtabl...

When I run R CMD check on a package I have recently started work on I get the following: * checking R code for possible problems ... NOTE addlinear: no visible binding for global variable 'x' I appreciate that this is only a NOTE and so I assume is R's equivalent of 'This is perfectly legal but I wonder whether it is really what you intended' but I would like to understand

Hi, I asked this question before, which was hidden in a bunch of questions. I repharse it here and hope I can get some help this time: I have 2 contingency tables which have the same group variable Y. I want to compare the strength of association between X1/Y and X2/Y. I am not sure if comparing p-values IS the way even though the probability of seeing such "weird" observation under H0

Hello, We are looking to adjust the font size of the axis annotation on the graph that results from use of the metaplot() function. Metaplot seems to respond to cex and cex.lab to change those graphical parameters, but it doesn't respond to cex.axis. Is there a way to work around this by creating a customized x-axis, and if so, how? Thanks for all your help. Syntax is below. Best, Dawn

Hi friends, I have a doubt reg the application of odds ratio. When evaluating a diagnostic test, what odds ratio I should apply? When I use.. *>oddsratio (X)** * the OR I get is not ad/bc. Thank you. Regards, Dr Manoj Aravind, PG Resident, Dept of Community Medicine, Osmania Medical College, Hyderabad, India. [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

# is there a bug in the calculation of the odds ratio in fisher.test? # Nicholas Horton, nhorton at smith.edu Fri Jan 22 08:29:07 EST 2010 x1 = c(rep(0, 244), rep(1, 209)) x2 = c(rep(0, 177), rep(1, 67), rep(0, 169), rep(1, 40)) or1 = sum(x1==1&x2==1)*sum(x1==0&x2==0)/ (sum(x1==1&x2==0)*sum(x1==0&x2==1)) library(epitools) or2 = oddsratio.wald(x1, x2)$measure[2,1] or3 =

I'm looking for a way to generalize the calculation of (log) odds ratios for 2 x 2 x {strata} frequency tables in vcd::oddsratio() to R x C x {strata} tables. For an R x C table, F, odds ratios can be defined in several ways; one simple way, particularly for tables with ordered factors, is to calculate the set of continuation odds ratios, based on the (R-1)x(C-1) set of 2x2 tables with

Just a general question concerning the woolf test (package vcd), when we have stratified data (2x2 tables) and when the p.value of the woolf-test is below 0.05 then we assume that there is a heterogeneity and a common odds ratio cannot be computed? Does this mean that we have to try to add more stratification variables (stratify more) to make the woolf-test p.value insignificant? Also in the

HI there, i know this is a basic question, though i need some help because this is somewhat away from my current issue, but nevertheless interesting to me... Lets assume i have some estimated probabilities, say estimated by a logit model. i know i can also state them as an odds ratio. Now i?d like to state these odds ratios as a reference to a specific outcome of my investigated

Here is a working snippet. library(epitools) mat <- matrix(c(10,15,60,25,98, 12,10,70,28,14, 9,11,68,10,12 ,8,13,20,11,58) ,ncol=2) colnames(mat) <- c("treatmentA","treatmentB") row.names(mat) <- paste("Cond",rep(1:10,1)) dimnames(mat) <- list("Condition" = row.names(mat), "instrument" = colnames(mat)) > mat instrument