search for: odder

> On Apr 30, 2019, at 11:21 AM, @lbutlr via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> wrote: > > On 29 Apr 2019, at 19:56, Zhang Huangbin via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> wrote: >> Recently we need to allow some users to login from everywhere except some IP/networks, > > Can you use firewall rules for this? I suppose not. We don't restrict ALL users this way,

...ey seem to work fine, however we need to apply some Security Filtering to a couple of them. We can add groups and users until we reach 6 groups/users/computers in the list box in GPO management. As soon as we try to add a 7th entry, GPO Management throws an "Access Denied" error. Even odder is that sometimes if we do this, then delete a previous entry from the list, the most recent one will magically appear. We are managing AD using RSAT tools on Windows 7. Has anyone else come across this problem? Regards Alex -- This message is intended only for the addressee and may contain...

...trange* quirks. They seem to be consequences of a cvs2svn lift in the past; this is...normal. All that stuff will get cleaned up and untangled by the time I'm done. I've dealt with the issue in interpreting mixed-copy commits that I mentioned in previous listmail. One of Subversion's odder features, the representation of tags and branching as directory copies, turned out to be a lifesaver here - because it means that the first commit on a branch always has content identical to whatever previous revision was the copy source. Thus, when I run into a branch/tag copy, I just ignore Subv...

...it the solution to x86 if the more general solution isn't > harder? > > As you didn't give any reason why the pvops approach is better other > than you don't care for non-x86 platforms you won't get an "Ack" from > me for this patch. It just looks a little odder to me. I understand you care about no-x86 arch. Are you aware 'pv_time_ops' for arm64/arm/x86 archs, defined in ?? - arch/arm64/include/asm/paravirt.h ?? - arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt_types.h ?? - arch/arm/include/asm/paravirt.h I am unfamilar with arm code. IIUC, if you'd implem...

...it the solution to x86 if the more general solution isn't > harder? > > As you didn't give any reason why the pvops approach is better other > than you don't care for non-x86 platforms you won't get an "Ack" from > me for this patch. It just looks a little odder to me. I understand you care about no-x86 arch. Are you aware 'pv_time_ops' for arm64/arm/x86 archs, defined in ?? - arch/arm64/include/asm/paravirt.h ?? - arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt_types.h ?? - arch/arm/include/asm/paravirt.h I am unfamilar with arm code. IIUC, if you'd implem...

...however we need to apply some Security > Filtering to a couple of them. > > We can add groups and users until we reach 6 groups/users/computers in > the list box in GPO management. As soon as we try to add a 7th entry, > GPO Management throws an "Access Denied" error. Even odder is that > sometimes if we do this, then delete a previous entry from the list, the > most recent one will magically appear. > > We are managing AD using RSAT tools on Windows 7. > > Has anyone else come across this problem? > > Regards > > Alex > > -- > T...

...ed to make GDM re-read it's config files. Well, it worked, but instead of staying on vt7, GDM moved to vt9. At first it looked liked GDM had died, but I ran ps aux|grep gdm, and found it running on vt9. Odd, that. I then tried a gdm-restart, and GDM disappeared again. It had moved to vt10. Odder, still. I was only able to get GDM to restart on vt7 by killing the GDM process, or by changing the server's run level from 5, to 3 and back to 5. On a CentOS 4.2, i386 box, gdm-safe-restart and gdm-restart function as I expected them to: GDM restarts and stays on vt7. I also didn't noti...

Hello, First a disclaimer :) I am very new to using R. I am generating some plots and eventhough I can get colored output in the encapsulated postscript files in the simplest of commands (e.g. plot(1:10,1:10, type="l", col="red") ), it does not work for the particular plots I want. It works on the screen. Here is an example taken out from "Mixed-Effects Models in S and

..."package:base" it's clearly not attached. I can't access any rNMR functions without loading rNMR again. .First still exists in the workspace, but somehow rNMR hasn't loaded. If this is the case, why is .onLoad running (indicated by the printed rNMR version info)? Odder still, the original version of .First was designed to open a tk toplevel containing rNMR menus, which it does. Commands from these menus work but commands typed in the console don't and everything else seems to indicate that rNMR is not attached. Any thoughts? Thanks in advance, Seth -- V...

...n Hines via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Hi Hongbin, > > On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 8:26 PM, Hongbin Zheng <etherzhhb at gmail.com <mailto:etherzhhb at gmail.com>> wrote: > Hi Steve, > > Several people told me that LLVM TOT bcreader can read odder version of bitcode without any problem. Do you know the oldest version of bitcode that the TOT bitcode reader supports? > > The current policy is that LLVM can read bitcode for any prior version with the same major version number. Thus 3.9svn can read all the way back to 3.0 (and also 3.1/3....

Hi Steve, Several people told me that LLVM TOT bcreader can read odder version of bitcode without any problem. Do you know the oldest version of bitcode that the TOT bitcode reader supports? Also, why do you generate bitcode instead of the textural representation, i.e. the "ll" file, for older version of LLVM? I guess generating "ll" code is simpl...

On Sep 21, 2011, at 4:51 PM, Matthew Hilt wrote: > The target in this case is 8-bit, accumulator based, however it is Von Neumann; so - good to know it's not *quite* the "Trifecta of Doom". LLVM offers some very attractive features for our usage, and it would be disappointing to abandon it as an option all together. Faced with the alternative being to write the compiler from

...general solution isn't >> harder? >> >> As you didn't give any reason why the pvops approach is better other >> than you don't care for non-x86 platforms you won't get an "Ack" from >> me for this patch. > > > It just looks a little odder to me. I understand you care about no-x86 > arch. > > Are you aware 'pv_time_ops' for arm64/arm/x86 archs, defined in > ?? - arch/arm64/include/asm/paravirt.h > ?? - arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt_types.h > ?? - arch/arm/include/asm/paravirt.h Yes, I know. This is just a...

I'm been experiencing a very very odd problem for the past several weeks and am throwing it out in case someone can shed some light on it for me. There is a single box on our tinc mesh which can be pinged from all hosts, but cannot ping any. It is not limited to ping, the box cannot communicate over tinc. tinc is running in router mode for this mesh. ~30 other nodes function normally,

...\\debian\docs1 into the address bar in a window, it will fail, but putting \\debian\docs1\test1 for an existing test1 directory that lives under docs1 will work fine. I am able to use smbclient to connect to the share from linux just fine. smbclient //debian/docs1 password -U testid It gets odder. This problem happens on my main XP box. A second XP box still works just fine, as it always has. Connects to share roots with aplomb. So it looks like samba is OK - connecting from this XP box and from smbclient works fine. As a test, I built another XP Pro box, as follows : XP with SP1 All...

​Hello all, I have written a code in llvmlite. Using command numba --dump-llvm example.py > example.ll I can have .ll file. However, using lli example.ll, I am stopped with error: 'main' function not found in module. Is there anyway at which it can be executed using lli? Thank you in advance Best -- This email was Anti Virus checked by Security Gateway. -------------- next part

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=742 mouring at eviladmin.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |enhancement Summary|sftp doesn't honor "Protocol|Allow sftp to read config |1" in config

...v at lists.llvm.org>> wrote: >> >> Hi Hongbin, >> >> On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 8:26 PM, Hongbin Zheng <etherzhhb at gmail.com <mailto:etherzhhb at gmail.com>> wrote: >> Hi Steve, >> >> Several people told me that LLVM TOT bcreader can read odder version of bitcode without any problem. Do you know the oldest version of bitcode that the TOT bitcode reader supports? >> >> The current policy is that LLVM can read bitcode for any prior version with the same major version number. Thus 3.9svn can read all the way back to 3.0 (and als...

...t; wrote: >>> >>> Hi Hongbin, >>> >>> On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 8:26 PM, Hongbin Zheng <etherzhhb at gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Steve, >>>> >>>> Several people told me that LLVM TOT bcreader can read odder version of >>>> bitcode without any problem. Do you know the oldest version of bitcode that >>>> the TOT bitcode reader supports? >>>> >>> >>> The current policy is that LLVM can read bitcode for any prior version >>> with the same majo...

Kai Schaetzl <maillists at conactive.com> wrote: > John R Pierce wrote on Fri, 17 Apr 2009 04:34:49 -0700: >> > odder, I don't see a "In-Reply-To:" header, so I dunno HOW it appears >> > threaded just fine. >> > > It's been put in the thread according to the time sequence because the > header you mention is missing. So, it just *appears* to be threaded, but > th...