Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "oddcastv2_wa2_bf".
2004 Aug 06
2
Suggestion: The ability to limit the number of ICY connections
On Fri, 21 May 2004, Jack Moffitt wrote:
> Maybe this is a stupid question, but why don't you just use Oddsock's
> plugins which support the better protocol?
Not a stupid question. There's three considerations.
1. This project has around fifty broadcasters. It has been running for
3.5 years, and whilst some have moved to using plugins like SAM which
(presumably) does
2004 Aug 06
0
Suggestion: The ability to limit the number of ICY connections
...ime ago, but haven't
really had any feedback (actually zero feedback) from anyone whose actually
tried to use it...I recoded the main UI to use common windows controls in
the hope that it would then become more blind-accessible... your feedback
is most welcome.. http://www.oddsock.org/tools/oddcastv2_wa2_bf/
>3. Quite a lot of our broadcasters are very fond of the FHG encoder. At
>least for now, we broadcast at 56kbps 22050Hz stereo, and whilst LAME has
>made some great strides at this bitrate in recent times (I use it myself
>under Linux and am quite happy with it), the FHG encoder doe...