Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "ocntents".
Did you mean:
contents
2007 May 02
2
CentOS 4 and CentOS 5 DomU on CentOS 5 Dom0: problems with hand-built OS and LVM
...dev/xvda and the
like. This means that extracting the data from a paused or shutdown
domain for backup purposes requires me looking *inside* that disk image,
extracting the partition information (with tools like kpartx, I assume),
and successfully mounting the partitions on Dom0 to image their
ocntents. And I haven''t worked that out yet, and I like having my
partitions managed out of Dom, not leaving DomU to play with it.
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
2004 Aug 06
7
a new directory service
> That said, we are all aware of the fact that there is a large amount of
> cheating going on, and therefore that number may not be so relevant nor
> accurate.
With the system I've outlined, there is no reason to cheat. There's
no need to fake listener counts because it's not there. Certainly
people can make this available in the 'description' field, ie, how
2004 Aug 06
0
a new directory service
On September 17, 2001 12:01, you wrote:
> > That said, we are all aware of the fact that there is a large amount of
> > cheating going on, and therefore that number may not be so relevant nor
> > accurate.
>
> With the system I've outlined, there is no reason to cheat. There's
> no need to fake listener counts because it's not there. Certainly
> people
2004 Aug 06
16
a new directory service
So I've been doing some research and thinking here and there about what
a _good_ directory service for icecast would be like. I'd appreciate
some feedback and some discussion on this topic, before I start putting
a lot of effort into developing it.
First off, I think getting rid of # of listeners is a must. It just
creates a self-fulfilling prophecy and encourages cheating. I think the