Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "ocml".
Did you mean:
ocaml
2003 Sep 06
2
[LLVMdev] languages, semantic trees, LLVM interfaces
...t-end is quite sophisticated
VSA> and complex and the LLVM representation would not be suitable for
VSA> supporting all the checking and translation.
But I have just meant ocamlyacc, i.e. ocaml clone of the yacc.
And here my question was: what kind of interface is expected to use
from within ocml, CommonLisp implementations, Haskel and other nice
language implementations? What is the expected way of interfacing
LLVM for those non-C language implementations? shared libraries with
plain C-interface or what?
Kind regards,
--
Valery A.Khamenya mailto:khamenya at mail.ru
L...
2003 Sep 09
0
[LLVMdev] languages, semantic trees, LLVM interfaces
...gt; VSA> and complex and the LLVM representation would not be suitable for
> VSA> supporting all the checking and translation.
>
> But I have just meant ocamlyacc, i.e. ocaml clone of the yacc.
> And here my question was: what kind of interface is expected to use
> from within ocml, CommonLisp implementations, Haskel and other nice
> language implementations? What is the expected way of interfacing
> LLVM for those non-C language implementations? shared libraries with
> plain C-interface or what?
Valery,
This is a good question and I don't think we have a good...
2003 Sep 06
2
[LLVMdev] languages, semantic trees, LLVM interfaces
Hello LLVM fathers,
1. "languages, semantic trees"
what do you think ideally, do languages implementations based on
LLVM need internal semantic tree or they should rather try to use
LLVM directly in/after syntax parsing?
For languages like C++ the expected answer is "of course we need
an internal semantic tree between parsing and LLVM!"
But I am still