search for: ocfs2_inode_lock_for_extent_tree

Introduce i_blockmask() to simplify code, which replace (i_blocksize(node) - 1). Like done in commit 93407472a21b("fs: add i_blocksize()"). Signed-off-by: Yangtao Li <frank.li at vivo.com> --- v4: -drop ext4 patch -erofs patch based on mainline -a bit change in ocfs2 patch include/linux/fs.h | 5 +++++ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h

...& i_blockmask(inode)) != 0; Or !!((pos | count) & i_blockmask(inode))? My concern is just like erofs, we'd better get vfs helper into mainline first. Or can we fold the whole series into one patch? Since it's simple enough I think. Thanks, Joseph > } > > static int ocfs2_inode_lock_for_extent_tree(struct inode *inode,

The message from this sender included one or more files which could not be scanned for virus detection; do not open these files unless you are certain of the sender's intent. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Introduce i_blockmask() to simplify code, which replace (i_blocksize(node) - 1). Like done in commit 93407472a21b("fs: add i_blocksize()").

Introduce i_blockmask() to simplify code, which replace (i_blocksize(node) - 1). Like done in commit 93407472a21b("fs: add i_blocksize()"). Signed-off-by: Yangtao Li <frank.li at vivo.com> --- v3: -none v2: -convert to i_blockmask() include/linux/fs.h | 5 +++++ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h index c85916e9f7db..17387d465b8b