search for: ocfs2_extend_file

...ot; Can anyone tell me what might be happening here? I have a 3 node cluster running under RH AS 4 (2.6.9-34.ELsmp) with ocfs2 v. 1.2.1. I've upgraded to 1.2.1 as suggested in the previous post, but one or more of my nodes continues to panic weekly: Aug 16 15:29:02 linux96 kernel: (6670,2):ocfs2_extend_file:787 ERROR: bug expression: i_size_read(inode) != (le64_to_cpu(fe->i_size) - *bytes_extended) Aug 16 15:29:02 linux96 kernel: (6670,2):ocfs2_extend_file:787 ERROR: Inode 1067290 i_size = 6073937, dinode i_size = 6074345, bytes_extended = 0, new_i_size = 6074037 Aug 16 15:29:02 linux96 kernel: ---...

...ocfs2_lookup: .. : ERROR: Unable to create inode .... Then OUI gave several error messages, e.g. .... Invalid stored block length on file ...../em/em.war followed by I/O error in file Errors in invoking to files ins_rdbms.mk and ins_ldap.mk Then /var/log/messages gave: OCFS2: ERROR (device ....): ocfs2_extend_file: Dinode # ...... has bad signature O' # I .... And the installation failed & CRS died. And the machines reboot. I ran fsck.ocfs2 -n /dev/...., it came clean. I have tested this several timnes & always same thing happening. If I use RAW partitions, everything works fine. So, the proble...

ocfs2 currently uses the Journaled Block Device (JBD) for its journaling. This is a very stable and tested codebase. However, JBD is limited by architecture to 32bit block numbers. This means an ocfs2 filesystem is limited to 2^32 blocks. With a 4K blocksize, that's 16TB. People want larger volumes. Fortunately, there is now JBD2. JBD2 adds 64bit block number support and some other

Hi, this is the next version of quota support for quota tools. I've addressed all the comments of Tao, Joel and others. Sparse feature disabling also correctly updates quota information now and the patch is merged into the tunefs support patch. Honza

Hi, I'm sending a series of patches implementing quota support into ocfs2-tools. It's the same as the original huge patch I've sent but now it's split as Joel asked. I've also realized that when disabling SPARSE feature, we should update quota information. That piece of code is missing, I'll implement it soon. Comments welcome. Honza

Hi, below comes a new version of the series of patches implementing quota support for ocfs2-tools. I've fixed the calls of ocfs2_malloc_blocks() which were given number of bytes instead of number of blocks. Besides that the series should be the same. Honza