search for: oceanbase

Josh Coalson <xflac@yahoo.com> wrote: > --- Scott F <graue@oceanbase.org> wrote: > > > If I use flac to encode with the --replay-gain > > option, I get a warning about the --no-padding > > option... > > > > "NOTE: --replay-gain may leave a small PADDING block even with > > --no-padding" > > > > ...eve...

If I use flac to encode with the --replay-gain option, I get a warning about the --no-padding option... "NOTE: --replay-gain may leave a small PADDING block even with --no-padding" ...even though I'm not using --no-padding. And the file does end up with a small padding block, so changing tags is slow. I'd fixed this bug in my own copy of flac 1.1.4, but forgot to submit the

Thanks Graue. That makes sense. Like I said - it's not causing a problem, I was just curious what it was doing. -Brad On 4/15/07, Graue <graue@oceanbase.org> wrote: > > "Brad Leblanc" <brad.leblanc@gmail.com> wrote: > > > While I'm playing around with it, I'd like to ask about something I've > > noticed. > > > > Sometimes when I use metaflac to add tags, it performs it's operation...

Pleas learn how to snip uneeded text from your posts. Version 1.2.0 is a stable release, which had some earlier beta revisions. I'd say it was quite well tested. Furthermore, there's no upgrade risk, as the API is still compatible. FLAC is backwards and forwards compatible. -Ivo

While I'm playing around with it, I'd like to ask about something I've noticed. Sometimes when I use metaflac to add tags, it performs it's operation instantly in a split second. Other times the same command causes lot of HDD I/O's and I can see it create a "filename.flac.metadata_edit" temp file. For example - I just added tags to a 25MB file and it took 15 seconds

Howdy, Flac-1.1.4 is refusing to encode some WAV files (amd64, gentoo): % flac Song\ Name-Track01.wav Song Name-Track01.wav: WARNING: legacy WAVE file has format type 1 but bits-per-sample=24 Song Name-Track01.wav: 100% complete, ratio=0.546Song Name-Track01.wav: ERROR during read of data pad byte % sfinfo Song\ Name-Track01.wav File Name Song Name-Track01.wav File Format Microsoft RIFF

Hal Vaughan <hal@thresholddigital.com> wrote: > If I post a link to the file, since it's from a CD, is there any problem > with copyright? I know this isn't a huge mailing list. I just don't > want to be creating problems with the RIAA and their temperamental > people. You could upload it and send the link to Josh privately. Otherwise, if you upload it with no

"Free Lunch" <freelunch@gmail.com> wrote: > I did a search on the error message and found someone else with a > similar problem and Josh's reply said: > > > but the wave file seems invalid. sample data is supposed to be > > padded to an even number of bytes. > > The gotcha here, as I have tried to explain in similar cases before, > is that we do

On Tue, 2005-06-14 at 17:22 -0400, Jean-Marc Valin wrote: > I'm not aware of any hardware player supporting Speex, but if you want > to contact companies, you can always start with Rio, iRiver, ... or > Apple? :-) Okay. You didn't give me any details though. I mean, is it actually feasible? And the point is to record, not just play. The device I'm talking about, that I wish

Hello, This is really a user question, but I couldn't find the speex-user list (i.e., there wasn't one) so I hope posting it here will be okay. So, one day I was browsing around the Ogg site, already a fan of Vorbis and FLAC, and I came across Speex. Hey, this looks cool, I said. So I played around with it by encoding various voice recordings, and was quite pleased with the results. But