search for: occast

Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "occast".

Did you mean: iccast
2005 May 10
3
Client has fallen too far behind
Hi, I've a little bit trouble. I've set up an icecast 2.2.0 and an ices 0.4 system. Every song, sometimes every two songs my playler lost the connection to the stream and in DEBUG-Mode I found a logfileentry like: DBUG source/send_to_listener Client has fallen too far behind, removing. I changed the queue-size in icecast.xml from 102400 to 902400 (don't know if it is a good
2005 May 10
0
Client has fallen too far behind
...d the queue-size in icecast.xml from 102400 to 902400 (don't > know if it is a good value) but the only result is the interrupt occur > some songs later. This usually means the client can't receive fast enough - possible because their connection is too slow. It's normal to get it occastionally with some songs. If it's dropping clients that are fast enough, maybe there's something wrong with your mp3 files? The ices log files might have more useful info. Increasing the queue size will almost always just delay a problem, not solve it. Mike > > I'm realy conf...
2005 May 10
1
Client has fallen too far behind
Michael Smith schrieb: >On 5/10/05, Anatol <icecast@recordcaster.de> wrote: > > >>[...] >> >> >This usually means the client can't receive fast enough - possible >because their connection is too slow. It's normal to get it >occastionally with some songs. > >If it's dropping clients that are fast enough, maybe there's something >wrong with your mp3 files? The ices log files might have more useful >info. > > Hm ... the two servers are in the same rack. From the one there is no problem to recive da...
2018 Mar 20
2
[cfe-dev] When to use '-mcpu' versus '-march'
...so, I'd match that. > b) Typically -march/-mtune (though the latter isn't supported in llvm at the moment, see an earlier post from me to llvm-dev on how to support that) are what I'd use for new ports. We used it in a number of new/out of tree ports in gcc as well. > c) -mcpu is occastionally used for "-march+-mtune" when -march by itself is generally "this architecture, but generic tuning". > -- Dick Hadsell 203-992-6320 <tel:(203)%20992-6320> Fax: 203-992-6001 <tel:(203)%20992-6001> Reply-to: hadse...
2018 Mar 20
0
[cfe-dev] When to use '-mcpu' versus '-march'
...> > b) Typically -march/-mtune (though the latter isn't supported in llvm at > the moment, see an earlier post from me to llvm-dev on how to support that) > are what I'd use for new ports. We used it in a number of new/out of tree > ports in gcc as well. > > c) -mcpu is occastionally used for "-march+-mtune" when -march by itself > is generally "this architecture, but generic tuning". > > > > -- > > Dick Hadsell 203-992-6320 <(203)%20992-6320> Fax: > 203-992-6001 <(203)%20992-6001> > Reply-to:...
2002 Feb 27
1
Bug in glm.fit? (PR#1331)
...) If it happens during a later execution of the loop in lines 60-139, then "coefold" was set to the value "coef" of the prior execution of the loop (line 137). Depending on whether either of the code chunks at lines 98-114 or lines 115-130 have been executed on that previous occastion, "coefold" may or may not be permuted to the same order as "start" in this moment. Hence, it could happen that "start" is shrunken towards something that doesn't make sense in line 105 or line 122. Relating to point 2) above. Theoretically, during the main lo...