Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "ocamljit".
Did you mean:
camlit
2004 Nov 07
2
[LLVMdev] LLVM for JIT only use
...:
Basile>> I want to try to use LLVM only for JIT only use (generating code in
Basile>> memory for x86 and, when available PowerPC [32bits])
If you want to know I am experimenting some JIT generation for a
experimental toy functional language [this is only a hobby] and I did
write the OcamlJIT (a JIT translator of Ocaml bytecode using GNU
lightning)
> Cool! FYI, the PowerPC JIT needs work to make it operational, but the
> x86 JIT is good to go.
> Don't worry about the configure errors at the end, and just run
> "make tools-only". That will build all the lib...
2004 Nov 07
0
[LLVMdev] LLVM for JIT only use
On Sun, Nov 07, 2004 at 10:33:09PM +0100, Basile STARYNKEVITCH wrote:
> I want to try to use LLVM only for JIT only use (generating code in
> memory for x86 and, when available PowerPC [32bits])
Cool! FYI, the PowerPC JIT needs work to make it operational, but the
x86 JIT is good to go.
> How do I ./configure to avoid being asked about llvmgcc, which, in my
> very partial
2004 Nov 07
2
[LLVMdev] LLVM for JIT only use
Dear All,
I downloaded the latest CVS of llvm
I want to try to use LLVM only for JIT only use (generating code in
memory for x86 and, when available PowerPC [32bits])
How do I ./configure to avoid being asked about llvmgcc, which, in my
very partial understanding, is only used to parse C code... If I
understand correctly what Chris Lattner emailed me, LLVM uses only GCC
frontend for C & C++
2004 Nov 07
0
[LLVMdev] LLVM for JIT only use
...to try to use LLVM only for JIT only use (generating
> code in Basile>> memory for x86 and, when available PowerPC [32bits])
>
> If you want to know I am experimenting some JIT generation for a
> experimental toy functional language [this is only a hobby] and I did
> write the OcamlJIT (a JIT translator of Ocaml bytecode using GNU
> lightning)
Sounds pretty neat.
> First, I am extremely confused by the terminology. IMHO, the runtime
> libraries would include (from my JIT only perspective)
>
> 1. all the LLVM libraries required to JIT-generate machine code, and...