search for: ocaml_exn_to_reply_with_error

Displaying 15 results from an estimated 15 matches for "ocaml_exn_to_reply_with_error".

2017 Jul 19
2
Re: [PATCH 02/27] daemon: Allow parts of the daemon and APIs to be written in OCaml.
...e is up inside the guest. > */ > @@ -1205,3 +1212,46 @@ cleanup_free_mountable (mountable_t *mountable) > free (mountable->volume); > } > } > + > +/* Convert an OCaml exception to a reply_with_error_errno call > + * as best we can. > + */ > +extern void ocaml_exn_to_reply_with_error (const char *func, value exn); > + > +void > +ocaml_exn_to_reply_with_error (const char *func, value exn) > +{ Shouldn't this use CAMLparam1 + CAMLreturn? > diff --git a/daemon/sysroot-c.c b/daemon/sysroot-c.c > new file mode 100644 > index 000000000..ad31d36ee > --- /...
2017 Jul 19
0
Re: [PATCH 02/27] daemon: Allow parts of the daemon and APIs to be written in OCaml.
...nd have 'f' > use it: > > let f t fun arg = > f (fun () -> fun arg) I'm a bit confused, do you have a compilable example? > > +/* Convert an OCaml exception to a reply_with_error_errno call > > + * as best we can. > > + */ > > +extern void ocaml_exn_to_reply_with_error (const char *func, value exn); > > + > > +void > > +ocaml_exn_to_reply_with_error (const char *func, value exn) > > +{ > > Shouldn't this use CAMLparam1 + CAMLreturn? It doesn't allocate on the OCaml heap so it should be safe. > > +let udev_settle ?fil...
2017 Jul 14
0
[PATCH 04/27] daemon: Reimplement ‘vfs_type’ API in OCaml.
...g ( [["vfs_type"; "/dev/sdb1"]], "ext2"), [] diff --git a/generator/daemon.ml b/generator/daemon.ml index ac410b733..121634806 100644 --- a/generator/daemon.ml +++ b/generator/daemon.ml @@ -524,6 +524,35 @@ let generate_daemon_caml_stubs () = */ extern void ocaml_exn_to_reply_with_error (const char *func, value exn); +/* Implement String (Mountable, _) parameter. */ +static value +copy_mountable (const mountable_t *mountable) +{ + CAMLparam0 (); + CAMLlocal4 (r, typev, devicev, volumev); + + switch (mountable->type) { + case MOUNTABLE_DEVICE: + typev = Val_int (0); /*...
2017 Jul 20
2
Re: [PATCH 02/27] daemon: Allow parts of the daemon and APIs to be written in OCaml.
...res = Chroot.f chroot (fun () -> ...) in than let res = Chroot.f chroot (fun () -> ...) () in This is mostly syntactic sugar. > > > +/* Convert an OCaml exception to a reply_with_error_errno call > > > + * as best we can. > > > + */ > > > +extern void ocaml_exn_to_reply_with_error (const char *func, value exn); > > > + > > > +void > > > +ocaml_exn_to_reply_with_error (const char *func, value exn) > > > +{ > > > > Shouldn't this use CAMLparam1 + CAMLreturn? > > It doesn't allocate on the OCaml heap so it should b...
2017 Jul 14
0
[PATCH 02/27] daemon: Allow parts of the daemon and APIs to be written in OCaml.
...length message which indicates that * userspace is up inside the guest. */ @@ -1205,3 +1212,46 @@ cleanup_free_mountable (mountable_t *mountable) free (mountable->volume); } } + +/* Convert an OCaml exception to a reply_with_error_errno call + * as best we can. + */ +extern void ocaml_exn_to_reply_with_error (const char *func, value exn); + +void +ocaml_exn_to_reply_with_error (const char *func, value exn) +{ + const char *exn_name; + + /* This is not the official way to do this, but I could not get the + * official way to work, and this way does work. See + * http://caml.inria.fr/pub/ml-archive...
2017 Jun 03
3
[PATCH 0/3]: daemon: Reimplement ‘file’ API in OCaml.
This patch series is just FYI at the moment. However it does pass the tests. The daemon is a self-contained program. We don't need to write it all in C. Writing parts of it in OCaml would make it simpler and less error-prone. In particular if the daemon was written in a more sane programming language then we could move the inspection code to run entirely inside the appliance, which would
2017 Jun 03
12
[PATCH v2 00/12] Allow APIs to be implemented in OCaml.
Version 1 was here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00003.html This patch series reimplements a few more APIs in OCaml, including some very important core APIs like ?list_filesystems? and ?mount?. All the tests pass after this. The selection of APIs that I have moved may look a little random, but in fact they are all APIs consumed by the inspection code (and some more
2017 Jul 14
45
[PATCH 00/27] Reimplement many daemon APIs in OCaml.
Previously posted as part of the mega utilities/inspection series here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00232.html What I've done is to extract just the parts related to rewriting daemon APIs in OCaml, rebase them on top of the current master, fix a few things, and recompile and test everything. Rich.
2017 Jun 05
19
[PATCH v3 00/19] Allow APIs to be implemented in OCaml.
v2 was here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00008.html This series gets as far as a working (and faster) reimplementation of ‘guestfs_list_filesystems’. I also have another patch series on top of this one which reimplements the inspection APIs inside the daemon, but that needs a bit more work still, since inspection turns out to be a very large piece of code. Rich.
2017 Jun 12
32
[PATCH v5 00/32] Refactor utilities, implement some APIs in OCaml.
This is a combination of: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00046.html [PATCH 00/12] Refactor utility functions. plus: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00023.html [PATCH v3 00/19] Allow APIs to be implemented in OCaml. with the second patches rebased on top of the utility refactoring, and some other adjustments and extensions. This passes
2017 Jun 19
29
[PATCH v7 00/29] Reimplement inspection in the daemon.
v6 was posted here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00103.html and this requires the utilities refactoring posted here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00169.html Inspection is now complete[*], although not very well tested. I'm intending to compare the output of many guests using old & new virt-inspector to see if I can find any
2017 Jun 21
45
[PATCH v8 00/42] Refactor utilities and reimplement inspection.
v7 was: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00169.html https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00184.html I believe this addresses all comments received so far. Also it now passes a test where I compared about 100 disk images processed with old and new virt-inspector binaries. The output is identical in all cases except one which is caused by a bug in blkid
2017 Jun 15
45
[PATCH v6 00/41] Refactor utilities, reimplement inspection in the daemon.
v5: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00065.html Since v5, this now implements inspection almost completely for Linux and Windows guests. Rich.
2017 Jul 21
27
[PATCH v2 00/23] Reimplement many daemon APIs in OCaml.
...aemon.ml were made incrementally through the patch series. Now these changes are moved into the first patch. This wasn't quite straightforward because I also had to move the static functions into a separate file so that bisection wouldn't break. - Related to previous change, move ocaml_exn_to_reply_with_error to daemon/daemon-c.c, and rename it guestfs_int_daemon_exn_to_reply_with_error. - Move separate patches implementing optgroups and CommandFlagFoldStdoutOnStderr into the first patch. - daemon/Makefile.am: Deduplicate BUILT_SOURCES & generator_built vars. - daemon/chroot.mli: In a comme...
2017 Jul 17
12
[PATCH v9 00/11] Reimplement inspection in the daemon.
This depends on the patch series "[PATCH 00/27] Reimplement many daemon APIs in OCaml." (https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00098.html) v8 was posted here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00274.html v9: - I split up the mega-patch into a more reviewable series of smaller, incremental patches. There are some other changes vs v8, but