search for: obviates

So I''d been running gem releases of rspec for the past several months, and I installed edge rspec so that I can use Story Runner. I''m running into a problem because I''ve got a couple rake tasks that reference "spec/rake/raketask". If I try to run "rake spec" then it pulls in the gem version instead of the plugin version. rake blows up saying that

hi all, curious is anyone has successfully sent http get packets to userspace for blacklist filtering ... i''d like to do a live cd that would obviate the neccessity to install squid and squidguard, but rather, have iptables send packets to squidguard (or something else) directly ... cheers charles

All, Just a note to let yo know that CVS Head has been changed so that the AsmParser no longer recognizes the "implementation" keyword and AsmWriter no longer generates it. The grammar has changed to require the "define" keyword for function definitions which obviates the need for the implementation keyword. This has been the case for a couple months now, but we never removed the keyword. It is now gone and so your previous .ll files with implementation keyword need to be updated. The llvm-upgrade tool will remove the implementation keyword. Reid.

On May 5, 2007, at 1:40 PM, Jeff Cohen wrote: > Bill Wendling wrote: >> On May 5, 2007, at 6:44 AM, Jeff Cohen wrote: >> >>> Bill wrote: >>>> The LLVM-GCC anonymous mirror should be updated now. Let me know if >>>> this happens again. >>>> >>>> -bw >>> >>> It's still taking over an hour for rsync to

On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 11:13 AM, Wei Mi <wmi at google.com> wrote: > I have the same worry as Philip and Hal that the new LoopExitValues > pass may increase some live range significantly in certain cases > because it reuses value cross outerloop iterations. Like the following > hypothetical case, the value reuse will create a live range living > across loop2, loop3, .... But

David Jones <dlj at google.com> writes: > >> * Provide C symbols as specified by the standards, but take advantage > >> and use C++ language facilities for the core implementation. > > Does this mean C programs would require a C++ runtime? If not, how will > the project ensure that? > > Shooting from the hip: no. Turning off exceptions, RTTI, and static

I am not currently subscribed so please email me below. First, my only experience with rsync has been older versions (e.g. 1.7.x) which did not allow daemon mode, so please bear with me. My problem is that I would like to mirror large quantities of data on a remote machine to a local one, but I don't care about encrypting the data itself. I only care about securing the connection from the

On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 12:22:33AM -0800, Shuxin Yang wrote: > I do some google, I cannot find the answer... > I check C std, I cannot find answer either. > > Delete infinite empty loop is boring, but if C/C++ lawyers could tell it > is safe to to so, > it would obviate the need to prove a non-countable loop infinite or not > before > DCE can delete it. > > That

I do some google, I cannot find the answer... I check C std, I cannot find answer either. Delete infinite empty loop is boring, but if C/C++ lawyers could tell it is safe to to so, it would obviate the need to prove a non-countable loop infinite or not before DCE can delete it. That is the answer I'm waiting for to delete a disgusting dead non-countable loop in my way. On 11/14/2012

Jeff Cohen wrote: > Bill Wendling wrote: > >>> I'll ping the guy who's in charge of the sync and ask him when it's >>> done. Right now, the copy to the Apple internal mirror is done at 2AM >>> PDT. From your email, I suspect that the sync is done around 3ish. >>> Though maybe it's somehow dependent upon when I update the mirror??

The intent of this option is similar to "tls-auth" in openvpn[1]: To refuse to talk to anyone who doesn't know the shared secret. You could compare this to port knocking, in that it solves a similar problem. This also prevents RST attacks from killing an existing connection, even when attacker can sniff sequence numbers. This feature doesn't work through NAT, since the source

Has there been any thought given to implementing authentication via an LDAP 'bind', rather than by a password lookup and hash comparison? doing a bind would obviate the need to make the passwords readable by the dovecot process and would lend itself to improved security. Phillip Needham Principal, iBright Consulting phillip at ibright.net 614-783-3301

3 computers... - WinNT4 - presently PDC-soon BDC - some file serving - print serving - AV server - Linux 1 - presently joined to domain - slave DNS/LDAP - primary file server - primary SMB HOME/PROFILES and SHARES - Linux 2 - presently BDC-soon PDC - web & mail server - master DNS/LDAP - DHCP server Should I be running winbind on Linux 1? Does Samba 3.0.0 with LDAP obviate the need to fix

...gt; > Just a note to let yo know that CVS Head has been changed so that the > AsmParser no longer recognizes the "implementation" keyword and > AsmWriter no longer generates it. The grammar has changed to require the > "define" keyword for function definitions which obviates the need for > the implementation keyword. This has been the case for a couple months > now, but we never removed the keyword. It is now gone and so your > previous .ll files with implementation keyword need to be updated. The > llvm-upgrade tool will remove the implementation keyword....

Bill Wendling wrote: > On May 5, 2007, at 1:40 PM, Jeff Cohen wrote: > >> Bill Wendling wrote: >>> On May 5, 2007, at 6:44 AM, Jeff Cohen wrote: >>> >>>> Bill wrote: >>>>> The LLVM-GCC anonymous mirror should be updated now. Let me know if >>>>> this happens again. >>>>> >>>>> -bw >>>>

Hi Folks, Let's keep this optimization alive. To summarize: several folks voiced general support, but with questions about why existing optimizations do not already catch this case. Deep dive by Wei Mi showed that the optimization is most likely not a clean-up of LSR sloppiness, but something new. Follow-up by myself confirmed that the redundancy eliminated the LoopExitValues pass exists in

Chris added alloca merging in the inliner a looooong time ago, 2009. The reason he added it was because at the time we didn't do stack coloring and without it we had serious stack size problems in LLVM. Since then, a few rather important things have changed: - We have reasonably powerful stack coloring support in the backend based on lifetime markers - Clang (the primary frontend I'm

Dear all, What does <DYN> (or say "dynamic node" that is generated by paser and used by cg in compilation stage) represent? What are the corresponding D lanauge futures of this? Any examples? TIA! Regards, TJ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Thanks Michael. Here is my (slightly corrected) version of the script, after I''ve done a bit of investment in the dtrace manual (always knew it''s powerful, but it''s more than that...). While it appears to run, and when I tried lowering the limit I started getting results, I''d appreciate it if you could please explain the actions attached to the last few probes

Bonjour a Tous, I would like to generate (on the fly) a list "popbeforesmtp" when dovecot POP/IMAP authentication succeed. Intended Format will/should be such as: 'timestamp_in_second' user_id remote_ip one user per line. My guess we have all the needed information within dovecot to make such list. But I have seen no way to 'trick' dovecot (dovecot-1.0.alpha3)