search for: obtuseness

Hi all.. I would like to switch to CENTOS Postfix from sendmail. My current sendmail, in combination with the very old obtuse-smtpd, allows me: 1. To control who of the internal users can send mail and to which domain or accounts 2. To control who of the internal users can receive mail and from which domain or accounts 3. To obtain a copy of all sent mails

Hi, people. I want to thank every one in the list, specially to Barry Brimer and Bill Campbell for their good advices. I will install CENTOS 5.1 and will try their recommendations. I must state that I would like to use Postfix in my box and I think it will fulfill the needed requisites (if I learn first what are "smtpd_restrictions_classes" and the other tips I received

Hi, I have no experience with R and I'm finding the manuals a bit obtuse and written as if I already understood R. I'm trying to import a csv file from a floppy and it's not working. The code I'm using is read.table("F:\GEORGIA\species_richness\SR_use.csv", sep=",", header = TRUE, row.names = 1) I'm assuming that this command is case sensitive so

Based on my understanding of her design, following is one obtuse motivating example: -------------------------- class A; class B; int foo(A* p, B* q) { p->a_int_field = 2; q->another_int_field = 3; return p->a_int_field; // !!!!! } ---------------------------------- the *-statement can be optimized into "return 2" if optimizer can prove type-A does not include

On 12/04/16 14:45, Duncan Murdoch wrote: > On 11/04/2016 10:18 PM, Bert Gunter wrote: >> "The documentation aims to be accurate, not necessarily clear." >> >> !!! >> >> I hope that is not the case! Accurate documentation that is confusing >> is not very useful. > > I don't think it is ever intentionally confusing, but it is often >

On 3/12/2013 9:56 PM, Shuxin Yang wrote: > Based on my understanding of her design, following is one obtuse > motivating example: > > -------------------------- > class A; > class B; > > int foo(A* p, B* q) { > > p->a_int_field = 2; > q->another_int_field = 3; > return p->a_int_field; // !!!!! > } > ----------------------------------

On 9/13/16 1:04 AM, David Chisnall via llvm-dev wrote: > On 13 Sep 2016, at 08:45, Alex Bradbury via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> 2) Arguably, Phabricator provides a confusing interface for first-time >> or irregular users. > I don’t think it’s fair to say that the Phabricator interface is confusing for first-time or irregular users. I use Phabricator on

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I don't understand what is wrong with rm either. But if you must have an empty directory is there a tmpfs where you can make one? Is there already an empty one like /var/empty? On 04/16/2015 10:13 AM, Ken Chase wrote: > Wow, it took me a few seconds to figure out what you were trying to > do. > > What's wrong with rm? >

Hi, First, thanks to those who helped me see my gross misunderstanding of randomForest. I worked through a baging tutorial and now understand the "many tree" approach. However, it is not what I want to do! My bagged errors are accpetable but I need to use the actual tree and need a single tree application. I am using rpart for a classification tree but am interested in a more unbaised

Basically new to [R] - as a programming environment at least (had lots of recent experience compiling it on our Opteron-based servers). Was trying to write some simple little scripts (in advance of porting over some bigger things from other environments - like MATLAB), when I realized that handling counters in loop constructs in [R] is not patently obvious (at least, IMO, compared to other

On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 03:25:10PM +0100, Serge Guelton via llvm-dev wrote: > On Thu, Feb 01, 2018 at 04:47:03PM -0500, James Y Knight via llvm-dev wrote: > > That said, I do think it could make sense to prepare llvm for the world in > > which "python" is python3 on some systems. So, I'd propose the following: > > 1. Change all #! lines to say

On 13 September 2016 at 07:59, Piotr Padlewski via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > This is exactly why we should switch to github. It is much easier for new > contributors to start with small fixes. There are two really quite separate issues here: 1) Patches, even trivial ones can sit unreviewed for long periods of time leading to a negative first time contribution

I'm looking to give the SPA-3000 a whirl as I'm having too much difficulty with the irq sharing thing inside the box. I'm reading the book but without having one in-hand to play with it appears a little obtuse at this time. Before I drop down my money can someone with some hands-on with one of these confirm if the SPA-3000 can: a) detect inbound distinctive ring (this looks to me like

Hi; In the Vorbis 1.1 release notes from July 7, 2004, Monty says "The 1.1 libvorbisenc allows setting the fixed reservoir size (in bits, defaulting to two seconds worth of requested bitrate) and 'hoarding' behavior (whether the encoder tends to keep the bit reservoir more full or more empty) as well as the other encoding heuristics available through the API of 1.0.1."

Reid Spencer kirjoitti: > So, now I'm not sure what you're talking about. Is > libgloss part of newlib? If so, please note that it is not llvm-gcc's > job to pass CFLAGS down. That would be a bug in the newlib makefiles. :) Sorry for being obtuse. Yes, if there indeed is a bug, it is in the newlib build system. I was trying to compile newlib with llvm-gcc. The need for

Hi, I'm trying to make a legend with a justified list of numbers, so I thought I would use phantom(0) to align the 3-digit numbers properly with the 4-digit ones: legend(x, y, xjust=1, yjust=1, lty=c(1,2,3,4,5), adj=c(0,0.5), legend=expression(phantom(0)*300*plain(K), phantom(0)*550*plain(K), phantom(0)*830*plain(K),

Hi I am trying to migrate from a Centos dovecot 1.0.7 install to a debian dovecot 2.1.7 install. I thought simply replicating the maildirs would be fine (using rsync) but when I fetch mail from the new server using IMAP thunderbird wants to download all the messages again as duplicates. I searched the wiki over to see if I could find a solution and while it appeared I could use doveadm

Hello everyone. Like others on this list, I'm new to R, and really not much of a programmer, so please excuse any obtuse questions! I'm trying to repeat a function across all possible combinations of vectors in a data frame. I'd hugely appreciate any advice! Here's what I'm doing: I have some data: 40 samples, ~460 000 different readings between 1 and 0 for each sample. I

let''s try this with a shorter subject, which was originally this, which probably tripped the list-admin-approval triggers.... Xen 3.2 Debian 2.6.18 on Dual Xeon with Remote Serial access - grub.conf config advice needed the subject says it all - anyone who knows the answer can stop reading and hit "send" with a few lines of grub.conf - however, for those people who are bored,

Dear R-Help: As you can see, Prof. Friendly refers me to your site for an executable version of vcd. I don't mean to be obtuse, but 15 minutes spent exploring your site failed to locate a downloadable version of the vcd package to which he referred. I know plainly what this application can do. What I need to know is how to obtain the application itself. My thanks in advance for any