search for: obstacle

> I recently made a major reorganization of the calling-convention > lowering code which cleared away one of the major obstacles to > doing this within codegen. > > Dan So what was the obstacle, and how was it cleared? And how do you see the large struct return working in codegen? Anything you care to tell me would be welcome. I will be starting on this today or tomorrow.

Hi all, I am working on an application in which we'd like to use attributes to attach simple metadata to arbitrary R objects. It is essential that all functions that will work on the original object will also work on the object after metadata attributes have been added. However, this is not always the case for vectors: functions such as barplot, diffinv, and rle use is.vector, which (as

...development and my personal experience, at the 3rd Free / Libre / Open Source Software (FLOSS) Conference which will take place on May 27th & 28th 2008, in the National Technical University of Athens, in Greece. I would appreciate if you could share your thoughts with me; What are today's obstacles on R package building, according to your opinion and personal experience. Thanks, -- Angelos I. Markos Scientific Associate, Dpt of Exact Sciences, TEI of Thessaloniki, GR "I'm not an outlier; I just haven't found my distribution yet"

On Sep 16, 2009, at 5:58 AM, Kenneth Uildriks wrote: >> I recently made a major reorganization of the calling-convention >> lowering code which cleared away one of the major obstacles to >> doing this within codegen. >> >> Dan > > So what was the obstacle, and how was it cleared? The biggest obstacle is that there used to be two different methods for lowering call arguments; some of the targets used on and some used another. There wasn't a good reas...

The only obstacle now to running this box as the mail server is that I do read and send mail on it occasionally, while working on something. I need gpg-agent, but can't find how to get it. Is it merged into another package, or do I simply have to look at other repositories? Anne

Hi PPC folks, as of v3.3 the integrated assembler seems to work fine. But it is not on by default. What is the obstacle for this last step? Just curious, Gabor

...uch platform-specific > knowledge into all front-ends. Sure. Alternatively, we could fix codegen to do this itself. I'd be happy to help anyone interested in working on this. I recently made a major reorganization of the calling-convention lowering code which cleared away one of the major obstacles to doing this within codegen. Dan

...g/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev --- end quoted text --- -- Karen Shaeffer Be aware: If you see an obstacle in your path, Neuralscape Services that obstacle is your path. Zen proverb

Hi Oscar, For development, CMake is working great for me. I rarely get build errors related to the project file being out-of-date. Is it true that CMake only generates absolute paths? Any idea on the difficulty of generating relative paths? I consider this a pretty big obstacle... Thanks for all your hard work on this, snaroff On Jan 15, 2009, at 9:46 AM, Óscar Fuentes wrote: > Douglas Gregor <dgregor at apple.com> writes: > >>>> Please, don't remove, I'm using!!! >>> >>> What's preventing you from using CMake? &gt...

...was posed about whether or not we should consider attempting to upgrade everything to run under httpd-2.2. I noticed the httpd2 port is only 2.0.53 under CentOS, and I was wondering why that is? Is there a 2.2 port? Is there plans to do one? Was it tried and found that there are significant obstacles in the way of getting 2.2 to run under CentOS 4.4? Is there a port of 2.2 planned for 5.0? Is it a question of resources, and should we undertake it, do you guys want the resulting i686 RPM's? Comment Karanbir? Peter -- Peter Serwe <peter at infostreet dot com> http://www.infost...

On 17 May 2016 at 20:04, Justin Bogner via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> Note that this would also fire when a commit referring to a PR gets >> reverted (assuming the reverting commit doesn't botch the commit >> message), etc., which is super useful for those following along on the >> bug's cc list. > > +1. This would be a very useful

Gabor Greif <ggreif at gmail.com> wrote: > as of v3.3 the integrated assembler seems to work fine. > But it is not on by default. What is the obstacle for this last step? Well, it's support is not complete ... The integrated assembler supports all general-purpose instructions the compiler itself generates, but has only partial support for all the rest, in particular nearly no support for any supervisor mode instructions. This means that if...

...kinit on the >> clients to authenticate and get a ticket. >> >> With an AD-DC and a fileserver (joined to the domain) (on separate >> machines) your scenario will work pretty much as it always did but >> with a recent Samba version. >> >> Do you see any obstacles, Rowland? >> >> - Kees. >> >> > > No, provided they can get a ticket from the KDC, they will get > authentication and they will get a better supported product. > > Rowland > I am confused by the "no", the rest of your sentence confirms exactly...

Hello, I want to create and save objects in a loop, but this is precluded by the following obstacle: this part of the script fails to work: assign(x=paste("a", 1, sep=""), value=1); save(paste("a", 1, sep=""), file=paste(paste("a", 1, sep=""), ".RData", sep="")) Do you know any workaround? I am already out of ideas....

In the latest snapshot from SVN on X86, llc refuses to compile functions returning structs larger than two i32 members. According to the docs, such limitations can be expected to exist on other platforms. This leads to a number of questions and observations: 1. Is there a good way to retrieve the current target limitations on struct return sizes? 2. The sretpromotion pass does not take struct

...oup Simon Fraser University - Burnaby Campus Phone : 778-782-6573 Fax : 778-782-3045 E-Mail : jpeltier@sfu.ca Website : http://www.sfu.ca/itservices http://blogs.sfu.ca/people/jpeltier Success is to be measured not so much by the position that one has reached in life but as by the obstacles they have overcome. - Booker T. Washington -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscribe@googl...

On 17 May 2016 at 20:40, Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com> wrote: > I don't see why? > The notion of title is already just a convention, any tool that look at the title has to filter it out of the full commit message in the first place AFAIK. > So I don't see any obstacle to have a regex that would match any part of the commit message. So, when I revert patches (using the git-svn script), it sets the title to: "Revert: <old title>" then writes on the body *only* "This reverts commit rNNNNN.". Unless the git-hook has a way look into rNNNN&...

Hi, Does anyone know a decent RoR hosting in the UK? I''m doing this for my project. Thanks in advance, Adi. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

...disk performance metrics. In case anyone's interested: http://docs.osg.ufl.edu/tsm/pdf/ some of them are more edifying than others. (ahem) I'm trying to develop a somewhat general framework for plotting these measures, in the hopes that it's of some use to people other than me. One obstacle I encounter is that, when I select one column out of a data.frame, the result is no longer a data.frame. So, say I've got, in data frame 'input' disk1 disk2 disk3 disk4 T0000 0 1 0 4 T0001 0 1 0 5 T0002 0 1 0 5 T0003 0 2...

...the README in the attachment, which should hopefully answer a lot of questions concerning the implementation and the current status. If you have further questions, comments, or suggestions, feel free to contact us directly or respond on the list. We would also like to know if there are any major obstacles to merging the code into LLVM trunk (apart from coding standards ;) ). Best regards, Helge Rhodin and Ralf Karrenberg -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20100427/8b80df47/attachment.html> -...