search for: obsfucate

I have been attempting some basic power calculations using R and I am not getting the results I expect. I had a homework assignment in SAS, but I want to learn R as well, so I was attempting to reproduce my result. (No one else in the class is doing R, so there's no need to obsfucate the answer, the SAS code is what I get my grade for.) The code I am using is: # You assume that the within-population standard deviations all equal 9. You set the Type 1 error rate at # alpha = .05. You presume that the population means will have the following values: 17.5, 19, 25, 20.5. # You int...

...ently, Structure layout is left to targets, which implement them according to the ABI of that platform. While this is fine for most structures, it makes packed structures very ugly. All fields in a packed type must be converted to byte arrays with casts to access fields, which bloats accesses and obsfucates the types. First class support for packed types would clean up the generated code from these (lowering bytecode sizes) as well as having minimal impact on optimizations. Consider: extern struct { char a; int x; int y; int z; } __attribute((packed)) foos;; int foo() { return foos.x + foos.y...

...out is left to targets, which implement them > according to the ABI of that platform. While this is fine for most > structures, it makes packed structures very ugly. All fields in a > packed type must be converted to byte arrays with casts to access > fields, which bloats accesses and obsfucates the types. First class > support for packed types would clean up the generated code from these > (lowering bytecode sizes) as well as having minimal impact on > optimizations. ... > The attached patch implements this (with the above syntax). Let me > know what you all think. &gt...

...ere is an obvious gaping security hole, it would be trivial for someone to read the querystring and exploit it to make free phone calls, spoof caller ID (if you allow the CallerID to be set with a QueryString value), etc. You want to make damn sure that the URL is not publicly accessible or somehow obsfucate the querystring, or use POST. In my case, I hard-code the destination phone numbers into the context so even if the script gets exploited all they can do is call a single guy. good luck -----Original Message----- From: Aloi, Christopher [mailto:caloi@usadatanet.com] Sent: Friday, February 17...

http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,1759,1812887,00.asp Specifically, his assertion that ISP's would sniff traffic and block, say, the SIP port. You could play wack-a-mole with port numbers, no? Also a community based, Freenet style of encryption implementation for "free" VoIP traffic would address this issue. I raise this to the list because I'm sure there's a grain of

...ts, which implement them > > according to the ABI of that platform. While this is fine for most > > structures, it makes packed structures very ugly. All fields in a > > packed type must be converted to byte arrays with casts to access > > fields, which bloats accesses and obsfucates the types. First class > > support for packed types would clean up the generated code from these > > (lowering bytecode sizes) as well as having minimal impact on > > optimizations. Cool! > Reid can chime in here, but it seems like there should be a more > efficient way...

...hat openLDAP and winbind work together with encryption in both directions. When I run winbind daemon with the command line service winbind start, the TLS connection cannot be initiated and I cannot allocate a uid to any user using wbinfo -i user. Let's see the configuration files (domain name obsfucated) : ##cn=config.ldif dn: cn=config objectClass: olcGlobal cn: config olcArgsFile: /var/run/slapd/slapd.args olcLogLevel: none olcPidFile: /var/run/slapd/slapd.pid olcToolThreads: 1 structuralObjectClass: olcGlobal entryUUID: e61f99ae-9076-1032-9144-9f2ad5621c65 creatorsName: cn=config createTimes...

always use the 2.6 variants and fix up for 2.4 under the hood Index: src/journal.c =================================================================== --- src/journal.c (revision 1156) +++ src/journal.c (working copy) @@ -105,9 +105,17 @@ return status; } -#else -#define ocfs_journal_start journal_start -#define ocfs_journal_stop journal_stop + +#define journal_start(journal, nblocks) \ +

Is it possible to run a Rails application from embedded ruby? I''m thinking of replacing dispaches with a C application which will then call the normal Rails dispaches and so on... Is this do-able? Many thanks, Kris. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.