search for: obsequi

Nathan Bullock wrote: > Just kidding. :-) My gosh. Your subject line nearly gave me a heart attack! :) > > Hi, I was just doing a Google search on my name and I > ran across a site that actually had a reference to > Obsequi a program I wrote almost three years ago now. > I thought the program had been forgotten a long time > ago (forgotten might not be the right word, I'm not > sure if it was ever remembered). > > Anyway I was just wondering how John Criswell ever ran > across such a low profile...

Just kidding. :-) Hi, I was just doing a Google search on my name and I ran across a site that actually had a reference to Obsequi a program I wrote almost three years ago now. I thought the program had been forgotten a long time ago (forgotten might not be the right word, I'm not sure if it was ever remembered). Anyway I was just wondering how John Criswell ever ran across such a low profile program, and why he decided t...

..../projects/llvm-test/MultiSource/Applications/hexxagon/hexxagonmove.cpp:89: error: 'struct timeb' has no member named 'time' =========================================== In file included from /usr/home/llvm/obj/projects/llvm-test/../../../projects/llvm-test/MultiSource/Applications/obsequi/globals.h:5, from /usr/home/llvm/obj/projects/llvm-test/../../../projects/llvm-test/MultiSource/Applications/obsequi/display.c:3: /usr/home/llvm/obj/projects/llvm-test/../../../projects/llvm-test/MultiSource/Applications/obsequi/utils.h:10:22: features.h: No such file or directory...

.../MultiSource/Applications/hexxagon/hexxagonmove.cpp:89: error: 'struct timeb' has no member named 'time' > > =========================================== > > In file included from /usr/home/llvm/obj/projects/llvm-test/../../../projects/llvm-test/MultiSource/Applications/obsequi/globals.h:5, > from /usr/home/llvm/obj/projects/llvm-test/../../../projects/llvm-test/MultiSource/Applications/obsequi/display.c:3: > /usr/home/llvm/obj/projects/llvm-test/../../../projects/llvm-test/MultiSource/Applications/obsequi/utils.h:10:22: features.h: No such file or...

...tions/hexxagon/hexxagonmove.cpp:89: error: 'struct timeb' has no member named 'time' > > > > =========================================== > > > > In file included from /usr/home/llvm/obj/projects/llvm-test/../../../projects/llvm-test/MultiSource/Applications/obsequi/globals.h:5, > > from /usr/home/llvm/obj/projects/llvm-test/../../../projects/llvm-test/MultiSource/Applications/obsequi/display.c:3: > > /usr/home/llvm/obj/projects/llvm-test/../../../projects/llvm-test/MultiSource/Applications/obsequi/utils.h:10:22: features.h: No suc...

...fo/ScopDependences/..., we have significantly reduced the compile-time overhead of Polly for a large number of benchmarks, such as:     SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/salsa20        -97.84%     SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/linear-algebra/solvers/lu/lu        -85.01%     MultiSource/Applications/obsequi/Obsequi        -57.12%     SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/stencils/seidel-2d/seidel-2d        -50.00%     MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/telecomm-gsm/telecomm-gsm        -40.09%     MultiSource/Benchmarks/mediabench/gsm/toast/toast       -39.91%     SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/whetstone       -...

...xagonmove.cpp:89: error: 'struct timeb' has no member named 'time' > > > > > > =========================================== > > > > > > In file included from /usr/home/llvm/obj/projects/llvm-test/../../../projects/llvm-test/MultiSource/Applications/obsequi/globals.h:5, > > > from /usr/home/llvm/obj/projects/llvm-test/../../../projects/llvm-test/MultiSource/Applications/obsequi/display.c:3: > > > /usr/home/llvm/obj/projects/llvm-test/../../../projects/llvm-test/MultiSource/Applications/obsequi/utils.h:10:22: features...

Hi, I get the following failures when I run the test-suite on linux (Ubuntu 12.04) using LNT (lnt runtest nt ...): (all are execution failures) MultiSource/Applications/Burg MultiSource/Applications/ClamAV MultiSource/Applications/lemon MultiSource/Applications/obsequi MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/automotive-bitcount MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/telecomm-FFT MultiSource/Benchmarks/Olden/voronoi MultiSource/Benchmarks/Ptrdist/anagram SingleSource/Benchmarks/BenchmarkGame Everything is built...

...ression/C++/ofstream_ctor 3. Some performance regressions GCC/LLC (2.6 -> 2.7), but keep in mind that I wasn't using GCC 4.4.3 as comparison for llvm 2.6! MultiSource/Applications/hexxagon/hexxagon 1.22 -> 1.14 MultiSource/Applications/lua/lua 0.91 -> 0.84 MultiSource/Applications/obsequi/Obsequi 0.93 -> 0.86 MultiSource/Benchmarks/ASC_Sequoia/CrystalMk/CrystalMk 1.01 -> 0.91 MultiSource/Benchmarks/FreeBench/fourinarow/fourinarow 0.94 -> 0.75 MultiSource/Benchmarks/FreeBench/neural/neural 1.0 -> 0.9 MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/telecomm-gsm/telecomm-gsm 1.06...

...; 3. Some performance regressions GCC/LLC (2.6 -> 2.7), but keep in mind > that I wasn't using GCC 4.4.3 as comparison for llvm 2.6! > > MultiSource/Applications/hexxagon/hexxagon 1.22 -> 1.14 > MultiSource/Applications/lua/lua 0.91 -> 0.84 > MultiSource/Applications/obsequi/Obsequi 0.93 -> 0.86 > MultiSource/Benchmarks/ASC_Sequoia/CrystalMk/CrystalMk 1.01 -> 0.91 > MultiSource/Benchmarks/FreeBench/fourinarow/fourinarow 0.94 -> 0.75 > MultiSource/Benchmarks/FreeBench/neural/neural 1.0 -> 0.9 > MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/telecomm-gsm/...

.../..., we have significantly reduced the compile-time overhead of Polly for a large number of benchmarks, such as: > SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/salsa20 -97.84% > SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/linear-algebra/solvers/lu/lu -85.01% > MultiSource/Applications/obsequi/Obsequi -57.12% > SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/stencils/seidel-2d/seidel-2d -50.00% > MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/telecomm-gsm/telecomm-gsm -40.09% > MultiSource/Benchmarks/mediabench/gsm/toast/toast -39.91% > SingleSource/Benchmark...

...se jit /MultiSource/Applications/JM/ldecod/ldecod ^^ weird jit codegen problem produces wrong FP output, PR963 llc /MultiSource/Applications/JM/lencod/lencod jit /MultiSource/Applications/JM/lencod/lencod cbe /MultiSource/Applications/JM/lencod/lencod ^^ no idea jit /MultiSource/Applications/obsequi/Obsequi ^^ no idea cbe /MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/archie-client/archie ^^ cbe doesn't support inline asm (bzero lowering) jit /MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/allroots/allroots llc /MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/allroots/allroots ^^ no idea llc /SingleSource/UnitTests/Vec...

...e significantly reduced the compile-time overhead of Polly for a large number of benchmarks, such as: >>      SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/salsa20        -97.84% >>      SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/linear-algebra/solvers/lu/lu        -85.01% >>      MultiSource/Applications/obsequi/Obsequi        -57.12% >>      SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/stencils/seidel-2d/seidel-2d        -50.00% >>      MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/telecomm-gsm/telecomm-gsm        -40.09% >>      MultiSource/Benchmarks/mediabench/gsm/toast/toast       -39.91% >>      Single...

...Hi, > >I get the following failures when I run the test-suite on linux (Ubuntu >12.04) using LNT (lnt runtest nt ...): > >(all are execution failures) >MultiSource/Applications/Burg >MultiSource/Applications/ClamAV >MultiSource/Applications/lemon >MultiSource/Applications/obsequi >MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/automotive-bitcount >MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/telecomm-FFT >MultiSource/Benchmarks/Olden/voronoi >MultiSource/Benchmarks/Ptrdist/anagram >SingleSource/Benchmarks/BenchmarkGame > >Everything is built off trunk. > >Has anyone else seen...

The 2.7 binaries are available for testing: http://llvm.org/pre-releases/2.7/pre-release1/ You will also find the source tarballs there as well. We rely on the community to help make our releases great, so please help test 2.7 if you can. Please follow these instructions to test 2.7: To test llvm-gcc: 1) Compile llvm from source and untar the llvm-test in the projects directory (name it

...blem, there's a PR filed on this. TEST-FAIL: llc /MultiSource/Applications/JM/lencod/lencod TEST-FAIL: jit /MultiSource/Applications/JM/lencod/lencod TEST-FAIL: cbe /MultiSource/Applications/JM/lencod/lencod * Not sure, difference in numerical output TEST-FAIL: jit /MultiSource/Applications/obsequi/Obsequi * Note sure. TEST-FAIL: cbe /MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/archie-client/archie * Note sure, CBE failed to link: /tmp/cc5Bwjx8.o: In function `keepWaitingDirsend': archie.cbe.c:(.text+0x715): undefined reference to `ltmp_1856_85' archie.cbe.c:(.text+0x735): unde...

I created the 1.9 release branch last night. As a reminder, please do not check in any code changes to the release branch. Please send me email if you have changes that need to be merged into the release branch. To check out the release branch: cvs -d <CVS Repository> co -r release_19 llvm cvs -d <CVS Repository> co -r release_19 llvm-test cvs -d <CVS Repository> co -r

...wing failures when I run the test-suite on linux (Ubuntu >>12.04) using LNT (lnt runtest nt ...): >> >>(all are execution failures) >>MultiSource/Applications/Burg >>MultiSource/Applications/ClamAV >>MultiSource/Applications/lemon >>MultiSource/Applications/obsequi >>MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/automotive-bitcount >>MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/telecomm-FFT >>MultiSource/Benchmarks/Olden/voronoi >>MultiSource/Benchmarks/Ptrdist/anagram >>SingleSource/Benchmarks/BenchmarkGame >> >>Everything is built off trunk. &g...

...ce regressions GCC/LLC (2.6 -> 2.7), but keep in mind >> that I wasn't using GCC 4.4.3 as comparison for llvm 2.6! >> >> MultiSource/Applications/hexxagon/hexxagon 1.22 -> 1.14 >> MultiSource/Applications/lua/lua 0.91 -> 0.84 >> MultiSource/Applications/obsequi/Obsequi 0.93 -> 0.86 >> MultiSource/Benchmarks/ASC_Sequoia/CrystalMk/CrystalMk 1.01 -> 0.91 >> MultiSource/Benchmarks/FreeBench/fourinarow/fourinarow 0.94 -> 0.75 >> MultiSource/Benchmarks/FreeBench/neural/neural 1.0 -> 0.9 >> MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBen...

...ains a few bug fixes and many >>> (refactoring and coding-convention) changes inspired by your comments. >>> >>> I'm currently trying to fix the bug responsible for causing a compile >>> failure when compiling >>> test-suite/MultiSource/Applications/obsequi/toggle_move.c; after the >>> pass begins to fuse instructions in a basic block in this file, the >>> aliasing analysis starts producing different (more pessimistic) query >>> answers. I've never before seen it do this, and I'm not sure why it is >>> happe...