search for: obscurely

Thanks in advance. here's the total firehose drink. I've obscured host, domain, subnet. Hope that will still work for you. Don't want all the info publicized. klist -ket /var/lib/samba/private/secrets.keytab!! there is no /var/lib/samba/private/secrets.keytab klist -ket /etc/krb5.keytab KVNO Timestamp           Principal ---- -------------------

Hai, In addition to Rowlands question. Can you run this script and post it to the list also. It gives a complete overview of what your running. Its basicly what Rowland asked, but with a few extra things. https://raw.githubusercontent.com/thctlo/samba4/master/samba-collect-debug-info.sh And the output of: kinit Administrator klist klist -ket /var/lib/samba/private/secrets.keytab

Hello, I've been reading up on lots of documents that mention the different ways to do things as far as joining a linux machine to AD and authentication. I've tried most of them but its not helping at all. I've included my config files for smb.conf, krb5.conf, pam.d/system-auth and the applicable nsswitch.conflines. For security reasons, i've obscured part of the domain name. Any

This is not a major issue, but is there any way to get the full directory name out when dir.create issues a warning? I am running R 2.8.0 patched on Windows Vista - full details below. With the following code: dir.create("test") obscure<-"test" dir.create(obscure) I get the warning message: In dir.create(obscure) : 't' already exists Session details: R

On 02/13/2015 05:41 AM, James Hogarth wrote: > This is horrible advice anyway. It's not a good idea to run SSH on a port > greater than 1024 since if a crash exploit is used to kill the process a > non-root trojan process faking SSH to gather credentials could then bind on > that port trivially totally compromising the system. This is where an SELinux policy on your server can

Pete Biggs wrote: > On Mon, 2017-11-27 at 12:10 -0500, Jerry Geis wrote: >> hi All, >> >> I happened to login to one of my servers today and saw 96000 failed >> login attempts. shown below is the address its coming from. I added it to my >> firewall to drop. >> >> Failed password for root from 123.183.209.135 port 14299 ssh2 >> >> FYI -

Hi, just a quick note to whoever is maintaining this page: http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Network/SecuringSSH The procedure is missing the firewall-cmd calls necessary in EL7: firewall-cmd --add-port 2345/tcp firewall-cmd --add-port 2345/tcp --permanent Also, it may be worth mentioning that semanage is in the policycoreutils-python package, which isn?t installed by default in all stock

Hi, just a quick note to whoever is maintaining this page: http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Network/SecuringSSH The procedure is missing the firewall-cmd calls necessary in EL7: firewall-cmd --add-port 2345/tcp firewall-cmd --add-port 2345/tcp --permanent Also, it may be worth mentioning that semanage is in the policycoreutils-python package, which isn?t installed by default in all stock

Dear colleagues, This may be a question with a really obvious answer, but I can't find it. I have access to a large file with real medical record identifiers (mixed strings of characters and numbers) in it. These represent medical events for many thousands of people. It's important to be able to link events for the same people. It's much more important that the real record numbers

Message-ID: <479F2A63.2070408 at centos.org> On: Tue, 29 Jan 2008 07:30:11 -0600, Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org> Subject Was: [CentOS] Unknown rootkit causes compromised servers > > SOME of the script kiddies check higher ports for SSH *_BUT_* I only see > 4% of the brute force attempts to login on ports other than 22. > > I would say that dropping brute force

I have two chromatograms I want plotted on the same axes. I would like the plots to be transparent, so the first chart is not obscured. I have tried adjustcolor(..., alpha.f=0.3), the problem is that my chromatogram is so dense with datapoints that they overlap and the entire graph just ends up a solid color. The second histogram still obscures the first. Consider this example: col1 <-

I want to put multiple plots on a page using par(mfrow), then a single title at the top. This should work, but doesn't: R> par(oma=c(0,0,4,0), mfrow=c(3,4)) R> for (i in 1:12) {plot(1); title(i)} R> ## text(10,10, ".") R> par(mfrow=c(1,1), oma=c(0,0,1,0)) R> title("Main Title") The main title does not appear. However, uncommenting the third line

<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.1//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml11/DTD/xhtml11.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" /><style type="text/css"><!-- #msg dl { border: 1px #006 solid; background: #369; padding:

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=809 Summary: ssh-keyscan breaks too obscurely when remote isn't an SSH server Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 3.8p1 Platform: All URL: http://bugs.debian.org/228828 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2...

With `obscure' I mean there is no appdb entry for it. The game (~?UhB?Y - Marisa to Alice -MariAri-) is a technically simple puzzle game, but it crashes during certain animations. `Worlds' (set of levels) show the animation only the first time you try so it is just annoyance, but boss levels always show that animation so you cannot play them. I am using wine 1.3.23; with a clean prefix

New chapter by Esteve Camps <esteve@hades.udg.es> on ''DSMARK'' for Differential Services: http://ds9a.nl/2.4Routing/HOWTO//cvs/2.4routing/output/2.4routing-9.html#ss9.6 And three obscure settings /proc files that are now documented, thanks to Jorge Novo <jnovo@educanet.net>: /proc/sys/net/ipv4/icmp_ignore_bogus_error_responses,

Hello! I am new to R (before used python exclusively and would actually call the R solution for this issue inside a python notebook, hope that doesn?t disqualify me right of the batch). Right now I am looking for a piece of software to fit a 1D data sample to a mixture of t-distributions. I searched quite a while already and it seems to be that this is a somehwat obscure endeavor as most

On 11/27/2017 02:02 PM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: > Pete Biggs wrote: >> - don't run ssh on 22, use a different port. > I consider that pointless security-through-obscurity. Security through obscurity it may be, but it isn't pointless. Tarpits are in a similar class; they don't help with security in the absolute sense, but they slow the attacker down, and that might

<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.1//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml11/DTD/xhtml11.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" /><style type="text/css"><!-- #msg dl { border: 1px #006 solid; background: #369; padding:

Ok, thanks for clearing it up. But: > It's not a bug things work in ways that confuse users when they pry > into things they were not expected to pry into.... Do you have a good= > reason to call this a bug? Well if it's intended to work that way then it's not a bug. As I said, I was computing on the language, in particular writing code = that processes the parse tree of a