search for: objs_state

Displaying 17 results from an estimated 17 matches for "objs_state".

2018 Oct 26
0
[PATCH v2 1/4] drm/dp_mst: Add some atomic state iterator macros
...topology_state_funcs; + +static inline bool +__drm_dp_mst_state_iter_get(struct drm_atomic_state *state, + struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr **mgr, + struct drm_dp_mst_topology_state **old_state, + struct drm_dp_mst_topology_state **new_state, + int i) +{ + struct __drm_private_objs_state *objs_state = &state->private_objs[i]; + + if (objs_state->ptr->funcs != &drm_dp_mst_topology_state_funcs) + return false; + + *mgr = to_dp_mst_topology_mgr(objs_state->ptr); + if (old_state) + *old_state = to_dp_mst_topology_state(objs_state->old_state); + if (new_state) +...
2018 Nov 16
0
[PATCH v6 1/6] drm/dp_mst: Add some atomic state iterator macros
...topology_state_funcs; + +static inline bool +__drm_dp_mst_state_iter_get(struct drm_atomic_state *state, + struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr **mgr, + struct drm_dp_mst_topology_state **old_state, + struct drm_dp_mst_topology_state **new_state, + int i) +{ + struct __drm_private_objs_state *objs_state = &state->private_objs[i]; + + if (objs_state->ptr->funcs != &drm_dp_mst_topology_state_funcs) + return false; + + *mgr = to_dp_mst_topology_mgr(objs_state->ptr); + if (old_state) + *old_state = to_dp_mst_topology_state(objs_state->old_state); + if (new_state) +...
2018 Dec 14
0
[WIP PATCH 12/15] drm/dp_mst: Add some atomic state iterator macros
..., false otherwise. + */ +static inline bool +__drm_dp_mst_state_iter_get(struct drm_atomic_state *state, + struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr **mgr, + struct drm_dp_mst_topology_state **old_state, + struct drm_dp_mst_topology_state **new_state, + int i) +{ + struct __drm_private_objs_state *objs_state = &state->private_objs[i]; + + if (objs_state->ptr->funcs != &drm_dp_mst_topology_state_funcs) + return false; + + *mgr = to_dp_mst_topology_mgr(objs_state->ptr); + if (old_state) + *old_state = to_dp_mst_topology_state(objs_state->old_state); + if (new_state) +...
2019 Jan 09
0
[PATCH v5 17/20] drm/dp_mst: Add some atomic state iterator macros
..., false otherwise. + */ +static inline bool +__drm_dp_mst_state_iter_get(struct drm_atomic_state *state, + struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr **mgr, + struct drm_dp_mst_topology_state **old_state, + struct drm_dp_mst_topology_state **new_state, + int i) +{ + struct __drm_private_objs_state *objs_state = &state->private_objs[i]; + + if (objs_state->ptr->funcs != &drm_dp_mst_topology_state_funcs) + return false; + + *mgr = to_dp_mst_topology_mgr(objs_state->ptr); + if (old_state) + *old_state = to_dp_mst_topology_state(objs_state->old_state); + if (new_state) +...
2018 Oct 26
8
[PATCH v2 0/4] drm/dp_mst: Improve VCPI helpers, use in nouveau
This patchset does some cleaning up of the atomic VCPI helpers for MST, and converts nouveau over to using them. I would have included amdgpu in this patch as well, but at the moment moving them over to the atomic helpers is nontrivial. Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel at ffwll.ch> Lyude Paul (4): drm/dp_mst: Add some atomic state iterator macros drm/dp_mst: Start tracking per-port VCPI
2018 Nov 07
5
[PATCH RESEND v3 0/5] drm/dp_mst: Improve VCPI helpers, use in nouveau
[sorry about the resend-copy pasted the wrong header and I want to make sure this doesn't get missed!] This patchset does some cleaning up of the atomic VCPI helpers for MST, and converts nouveau over to using them. I would have included amdgpu in this patch as well, but at the moment moving them over to the atomic helpers is nontrivial. Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel at ffwll.ch> Lyude
2018 Nov 08
5
[PATCH v4 0/5] drm/dp_mst: Improve VCPI helpers, use in nouveau
This patchset does some cleaning up of the atomic VCPI helpers for MST, and converts nouveau over to using them. I would have included amdgpu in this patch as well, but at the moment moving them over to the atomic helpers is nontrivial. Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel at ffwll.ch> Lyude Paul (5): drm/dp_mst: Add some atomic state iterator macros drm/dp_mst: Start tracking per-port VCPI
2018 Nov 08
5
[PATCH v5 0/5] drm/dp_mst: Improve VCPI helpers, use in nouveau
This patchset does some cleaning up of the atomic VCPI helpers for MST, and converts nouveau over to using them. I would have included amdgpu in this patch as well, but at the moment moving them over to the atomic helpers is nontrivial. Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel at ffwll.ch> Lyude Paul (5): drm/dp_mst: Add some atomic state iterator macros drm/dp_mst: Start tracking per-port VCPI
2018 Nov 16
8
[PATCH v6 0/6] drm/dp_mst: Improve VCPI helpers, use in nouveau
This patchset does some cleaning up of the atomic VCPI helpers for MST, and converts nouveau over to using them. I would have included amdgpu in this patch as well, but at the moment moving them over to the atomic helpers is nontrivial. [sorry for still not adding your R-Bs! I ended up needing to make a lot of changes to make it so we do actually kref() each port in the atomic state] Cc: Daniel
2018 Nov 07
6
[PATCH v3 0/5] drm/dp_mst: Add some atomic state iterator macros
This patchset does some cleaning up of the atomic VCPI helpers for MST, and converts nouveau over to using them. I would have included amdgpu in this patch as well, but at the moment moving them over to the atomic helpers is nontrivial. Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel at ffwll.ch> Lyude Paul (5): drm/dp_mst: Add some atomic state iterator macros drm/dp_mst: Start tracking per-port VCPI
2019 Jan 09
27
[PATCH v5 00/20] MST refcounting/atomic helpers cleanup
This is the series I've been working on for a while now to get all of the atomic DRM drivers in the tree to use the atomic MST helpers, and to make the atomic MST helpers actually idempotent. Turns out it's a lot more difficult to do that without also fixing how port and branch device refcounting works so that it actually makes sense, since the current upstream implementation requires a
2019 Jan 03
16
[PATCH v3 00/16] MST refcounting/atomic helpers cleanup
This is the series I've been working on for a while now to get all of the atomic DRM drivers in the tree to use the atomic MST helpers, and to make the atomic MST helpers actually idempotent. Turns out it's a lot more difficult to do that without also fixing how port and branch device refcounting works so that it actually makes sense, since the current upstream implementation requires a
2019 Jan 11
20
[PATCH v7 00/20] MST refcounting/atomic helpers cleanup
This is the series I've been working on for a while now to get all of the atomic DRM drivers in the tree to use the atomic MST helpers, and to make the atomic MST helpers actually idempotent. Turns out it's a lot more difficult to do that without also fixing how port and branch device refcounting works so that it actually makes sense, since the current upstream implementation requires a
2019 Jan 10
21
[PATCH v6 00/20] MST refcounting/atomic helpers cleanup
This is the series I've been working on for a while now to get all of the atomic DRM drivers in the tree to use the atomic MST helpers, and to make the atomic MST helpers actually idempotent. Turns out it's a lot more difficult to do that without also fixing how port and branch device refcounting works so that it actually makes sense, since the current upstream implementation requires a
2018 Dec 20
22
[PATCH v2 00/16] MST refcounting/atomic helpers cleanup
This is the series I've been working on for a while now to get all of the atomic DRM drivers in the tree to use the atomic MST helpers, and to make the atomic MST helpers actually idempotent. Turns out it's a lot more difficult to do that without also fixing how port and branch device refcounting works so that it actually makes sense, since the current upstream implementation requires a
2019 Jan 05
19
[PATCH v4 00/16] MST refcounting/atomic helpers cleanup
This is the series I've been working on for a while now to get all of the atomic DRM drivers in the tree to use the atomic MST helpers, and to make the atomic MST helpers actually idempotent. Turns out it's a lot more difficult to do that without also fixing how port and branch device refcounting works so that it actually makes sense, since the current upstream implementation requires a
2018 Dec 14
22
[WIP PATCH 00/15] MST refcounting/atomic helpers cleanup
This is a WIP version of the series I've been working on for a while now to get all of the atomic DRM drivers in the tree to use the atomic MST helpers, and to make the atomic MST helpers actually idempotent. Turns out it's a lot more difficult to do that without also fixing how port and branch device refcounting works so that it actually makes sense, since the current upstream