Displaying 20 results from an estimated 26 matches for "objinst".
2006 Nov 17
2
[LLVMdev] 1.9 Prerelease Available for Testing (TAKE TWO)
...e/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/methcall
> TEST-FAIL: llc /SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/nestedloop
> TEST-FAIL: jit /SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/nestedloop
> TEST-FAIL: cbe /SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/nestedloop
> TEST-FAIL: llc /SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/objinst
> TEST-FAIL: jit /SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/objinst
> TEST-FAIL: cbe /SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/objinst
> TEST-FAIL: llc /SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/random
> TEST-FAIL: jit /SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/random
> TEST-FAIL: cbe /SingleSource/Ben...
2006 Nov 16
0
[LLVMdev] 1.9 Prerelease Available for Testing
...IL: cbe /SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/methcall
TEST-FAIL: llc /SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/nestedloop
TEST-FAIL: jit /SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/nestedloop
TEST-FAIL: cbe /SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/nestedloop
TEST-FAIL: llc /SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/objinst
TEST-FAIL: jit /SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/objinst
TEST-FAIL: cbe /SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/objinst
TEST-FAIL: llc /SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/random
TEST-FAIL: jit /SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/random
TEST-FAIL: cbe /SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/rand...
2006 Nov 14
5
[LLVMdev] 1.9 Prerelease Available for Testing
LLVMers,
The LLVM 1.9 Prerelease is available for testing:
http://llvm.org/prereleases/1.9/
If anyone can spare some time, please download the appropriate tarballs
for your platform and test the release (at least with make check). I'd
also appreciate any documentation reviews.
Please note that llvm-gcc3 on x86 may not have a clean dejagnu run. You
should see one XPASS for
2009 Mar 09
2
[LLVMdev] [llvm-testresults] cfarm-x86-64 x86_64 nightly tester results
....22% (15.11 => 18.92)
> singlesource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/ray: 5.34% (7.87 => 7.45)
> singlesource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/sphereflake: 14.86% (6.46 => 5.50)
> singlesource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/stepanov_container: -1698.18% (0.55 => 9.89)
> singlesource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/objinst: 5.25% (7.81 => 7.40)
> singlesource/Benchmarks/Shootout/methcall: -16.47% (8.56 => 9.97)
> multisource/Applications/aha/aha: 59.87% (15.40 => 6.18)
> multisource/Applications/hexxagon/hexxagon: 9.50% (15.27 => 13.82)
> multisource/Benchmarks/PAQ8p/paq8p: 5.16% (173.51 =...
2014 May 04
12
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Benchmarking subset of the test suite
At the LLVM Developers' Meeting in November, I promised to work on isolating a subset of the current test suite that is useful for benchmarking. Having looked at this in more detail, most of the applications and benchmarks in the test suite are useful for benchmarking, and so I think that a better way of phrasing it is that we should construct a list of programs in the test suite that are not
2012 Feb 19
2
[LLVMdev] Problem While Running Test Suite
...rce/Benchmarks/Shootout/hello | * | * |
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout/nestedloop | * | * |
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout/methcall | * | * |
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout/objinst | * | * |
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout/sieve | * | * |
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout/matrix | * | * |
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout/lists...
2014 Aug 12
4
[LLVMdev] Explicit template instantiations in libc++
Most of libc++ doesn't have explicit template instantiations, which
leads to a pretty significant build time and code size cost when using
libc++, since a large number of common templates will be emitted by the
compiler and coalesced by the linker. Notably, in include/__config, we
have:
#ifndef _LIBCPP_EXTERN_TEMPLATE
#define _LIBCPP_EXTERN_TEMPLATE(...)
#endif
whereas before
2008 Feb 03
0
[LLVMdev] 2.2 Prerelease available for testing
...0.78 | 0.73 1.11 n/a n/a
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/nestedloop | 0.0128 3388 0.0107 * 0.0108 | 12.04 0.24 0.29 * 0.31 | 50.17 41.52 n/a n/a
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/objinst | 0.0224 6100 0.0213 * 0.0194 | 31.61 30.32 30.26 * 18.12 | 1.04 1.04 n/a n/a
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/random | 0.0092 3012 0.0069 * 0.0067...
2007 Sep 18
0
[LLVMdev] 2.1 Pre-Release Available (testers needed)
...0.61 | 0.84 1.07 n/a n/a
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/nestedloop | 0.0120 2204 0.0120 * 0.0080 | 10.15 10.14 10.75 * 10.34 | 1.00 0.94 n/a n/a
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/objinst | 0.0120 4780 0.0120 * 0.0120 | 16.13 16.01 18.15 * 15.85 | 1.01 0.89 n/a n/a
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/random | 0.0080 1856 0.0000 * 0.0080...
2008 Jan 24
6
[LLVMdev] 2.2 Prerelease available for testing
LLVMers,
The 2.2 prerelease is now available for testing:
http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.2/
If anyone can help test this release, I ask that you do the following:
1) Build llvm and llvm-gcc (or use a binary). You may build release
(default) or debug. You may pick llvm-gcc-4.0, llvm-gcc-4.2, or both.
2) Run 'make check'.
3) In llvm-test, run 'make TEST=nightly report'.
4) When
2007 Sep 18
0
[LLVMdev] 2.1 Pre-Release Available (testers needed)
...0.92 | 0.92 1.01 n/a n/a
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/nestedloop | 0.0085 2156 0.0112 * 0.0097 | 8.02 10.95 8.48 * 8.71 | 0.73 0.95 n/a n/a
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/objinst | 0.0146 4732 0.0233 * 0.0153 | 53.07 53.01 53.77 * 41.87 | 1.00 0.99 n/a n/a
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/random | 0.0077 1792 0.0055 * 0.0128...
2008 Jan 28
0
[LLVMdev] 2.2 Prerelease available for testing
...0.25 | 0.91 0.95 n/a n/a
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/nestedloop | 0.0052 3424 0.0047 * 0.0049 | 7.93 0.00 0.24 * 0.33 | - 33.04 n/a n/a
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/objinst | 0.0091 6212 0.0104 * 0.0176 | 12.98 13.04 13.40 * 8.40 | 1.00 0.97 n/a n/a
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/random | 0.0047 3044 0.0036 * 0.0035...
2009 Oct 20
1
[LLVMdev] 2.6 pre-release2 ready for testing
...| 0.90 0.90 n/a n/a
> SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/nestedloop |
> 0.0499 8064 0.0400 * 0.0300 | 0.18 0.01
> 0.18 * 0.22 | - 1.00 n/a n/a
> SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/objinst |
> 0.0400 10992 0.0500 * 0.0499 | 5.73 5.80
> 5.64 * 5.66 | 0.99 1.02 n/a n/a
> SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/random |
> 0.0500 7816 0.0300 * ...
2009 Oct 20
0
[LLVMdev] 2.6 pre-release2 ready for testing
Hi Tanya,
> 1) Compile llvm from source and untar the llvm-test in the projects
> directory (name it llvm-test or test-suite). Choose to use a
> pre-compiled llvm-gcc or re-compile it yourself.
I compiled llvm and llvm-gcc with separate objects directories.
Platform is x86_64-linux-gnu.
> 2) Run make check, report any failures (FAIL or unexpected pass). Note
> that you need to
2009 Oct 20
1
[LLVMdev] 2.6 pre-release2 ready for testing
...a n/a
> SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/
> nestedloop | 0.0499 8064 0.0400
> * 0.0300 | 0.18 0.01 0.18 *
> 0.22 | - 1.00 n/a n/a
> SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/
> objinst | 0.0400 10992 0.0500
> * 0.0499 | 5.73 5.80 5.64 *
> 5.66 | 0.99 1.02 n/a n/a
> SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/
> random | 0.0500 7816 0.0300
>...
2011 Dec 01
1
[LLVMdev] [llvm-testresults] bwilson__llvm-gcc_PROD__i386 nightly tester results
...gt; 1.75% 0.0572 0.0582 0.0001
> SingleSource/Regression/C/uint64_to_float.compile
> <http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/simple/nts/380/graph?pset.0=on&test.SingleSource%2FRegression%2FC%2Fuint64_to_float.compile=on>
> 1.75% 0.0515 0.0524 0.0002
> SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout/objinst.compile
> <http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/simple/nts/380/graph?pset.0=on&test.SingleSource%2FBenchmarks%2FShootout%2Fobjinst.compile=on>
> 1.75% 0.0458 0.0466 0.0002
> SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/richards_benchmark.compile
> <http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/simple/nts/380...
2007 Sep 15
22
[LLVMdev] 2.1 Pre-Release Available (testers needed)
LLVMers,
The 2.1 pre-release (version 1) is available for testing:
http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.1/version1/
I'm looking for members of the LLVM community to test the 2.1
release. There are 2 ways you can help:
1) Download llvm-2.1, llvm-test-2.1, and the appropriate llvm-gcc4.0
binary. Run "make check" and the full llvm-test suite (make
TEST=nightly report).
2) Download
2016 Apr 26
3
RFC: LNT/Test-suite support for custom metrics and test parameterization
...flexible.
>
> There is no opportunity to run another test-suite except simple one.
>
> 2. Performance is quite bad when database has a lot of records.
>
> For example, rendering graph is too slow. On
> green-dragon-07-x86_64-O3-flto:42
> SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout/objinst compile_time need for rendering
> 191.8 seconds.
>
> 3. It’s difficult to add new features which need queries to sample
> table in database(if we use BLOB field for custom metrics).
>
> Queries will be needed for more complex analysis. For example, if we would
> like to...
2009 Oct 17
12
[LLVMdev] 2.6 pre-release2 ready for testing
LLVMers,
2.6 pre-release2 is ready to be tested by the community.
http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.6/
If you have time, I'd appreciate anyone who can help test the release.
To test llvm-gcc:
1) Compile llvm from source and untar the llvm-test in the projects
directory (name it llvm-test or test-suite). Choose to use a pre-
compiled llvm-gcc or re-compile it yourself.
2) Run make check,
2016 Apr 26
2
RFC: LNT/Test-suite support for custom metrics and test parameterization
Hi, Chris.
Thank you for your answer about compile tests. As I understood during looking through code of compile tests they don’t use test suite at all. Am I right? There is lack of information and examples of running compile tests in LNT documentation.
We understood that there are two groups of users: users using servers and collecting a lot of data and SQLite users, but these users as I think