Displaying 11 results from an estimated 11 matches for "objfs".
Did you mean:
objfso
2008 Jun 01
1
capacity query
...0K 0K 0% /devices
ctfs 0K 0K 0K 0% /system/contract
proc 0K 0K 0K 0% /proc
mnttab 0K 0K 0K 0% /etc/mnttab
swap 6.4G 684K 6.4G 1% /etc/svc/volatile
objfs 0K 0K 0K 0% /system/object
/usr/lib/libc/libc_hwcap2.so.1
14G 4.0G 10G 28% /lib/libc.so.1
fd 0K 0K 0K 0% /dev/fd
swap 6.4G 28K 6.4G 1% /tmp
swap...
2008 Aug 26
5
Problem w/ b95 + ZFS (version 11) - seeing fair number of errors on multiple machines
Hi,
After upgrading to b95 of OSOL/Indiana, and doing a ZFS upgrade to the newer
revision, all arrays I have using ZFS mirroring are displaying errors. This
started happening immediately after ZFS upgrades. Here is an example:
ormandj at neutron.corenode.com:~$ zpool status
pool: rpool
state: DEGRADED
status: One or more devices has experienced an unrecoverable error. An
attempt was
2007 Jul 18
0
zfs and zones newbie question
.../devices
ctfs 0K 0K 0K 0% /system/contract
proc 0K 0K 0K 0% /proc
mnttab 0K 0K 0K 0% /etc/mnttab
swap 815M 716K 815M 1% /etc/svc/volatile
objfs 0K 0K 0K 0% /system/object
/usr/lib/libc/libc_hwcap1.so.1
4,7G 3,1G 1,5G 67% /lib/libc.so.1
fd 0K 0K 0K 0% /dev/fd
swap 815M 8K 815M 1% /tmp
swa...
2008 Jun 26
3
[Bug 2334] New: zpool destroy panics after zfs_force_umount_stress
...0K 0K 0K 0% /dev
ctfs 0K 0K 0K 0% /system/contract
proc 0K 0K 0K 0% /proc
mnttab 0K 0K 0K 0% /etc/mnttab
swap 2.2G 1.1M 2.2G 1% /etc/svc/volatile
objfs 0K 0K 0K 0% /system/object
sharefs 0K 0K 0K 0% /etc/dfs/sharetab
/usr/lib/libc/libc_hwcap2.so.1
8.9G 5.9G 2.9G 67% /lib/libc.so.1
fd 0K 0K 0K 0% /dev/fd
swap...
2006 Sep 01
4
create ZFS pool(s)/volume(s) during jumpstart instalation
Anyone have idea how to create ZFS pool and volumes during jumstart
instalation ? (I''m using JumpStart Enterprise Toolkit)
kloczek
2007 Mar 14
4
solaris 10 + dovecot (1)
...0K 0K 0K 0% /devices
ctfs 0K 0K 0K 0% /system/contract
proc 0K 0K 0K 0% /proc
mnttab 0K 0K 0K 0% /etc/mnttab
swap 689M 652K 688M 1% /etc/svc/volatile
objfs 0K 0K 0K 0% /system/object
/usr/lib/libc/libc_hwcap1.so.1
4,4G 4,3G 57M 99% /lib/libc.so.1
fd 0K 0K 0K 0% /dev/fd
swap 688M 40K 688M 1% /tmp
swap...
2008 Apr 03
3
[Bug 971] New: zfs key -l fails after unloading (keyscope=dataset)
http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=971
Summary: zfs key -l fails after unloading (keyscope=dataset)
Classification: Development
Product: zfs-crypto
Version: unspecified
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Solaris
Status: NEW
Severity: major
Priority: P2
Component: other
AssignedTo:
2008 Jan 24
1
zfs showing more filesystem using ls than df actually has
...0 0% /devices
ctfs 0 0 0 0% /system/contract
proc 0 0 0 0% /proc
mnttab 0 0 0 0% /etc/mnttab
swap 4162160 1368 4160792 1% /etc/svc/volatile
objfs 0 0 0 0% /system/object
fd 0 0 0 0% /dev/fd
swap 4160904 112 4160792 1% /tmp
swap 4160880 88 4160792 1% /var/run
poolZ 2048000 105531 1839988...
2007 Feb 10
16
How to backup a slice ? - newbie
... though I tried, read and typed the last 4 hours; still no clue.
Please, can anyone give a clear idea on how this works:
Get the content of c0d1s1 to c0d0s7 ?
c0d1s1 is pool home and active; c0d0s7 is not active.
I have followed the suggestion on
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/zfs/demos/zfs_demo.pdf
% sudo zfs snapshot home at backup
% zfs list
NAME USED AVAIL REFER
2008 Dec 17
12
disk utilization is over 200%
Hello,
I use Brendan''s sysperfstat script to see the overall system performance and
found the the disk utilization is over 100:
15:51:38 14.52 15.01 200.00 24.42 0.00 0.00 83.53 0.00
15:51:42 11.37 15.01 200.00 25.48 0.00 0.00 88.43 0.00
------ Utilisation ------ ------ Saturation ------
Time %CPU %Mem %Disk %Net CPU Mem
2007 Dec 09
8
zpool kernel panics.
Hi Folks,
I''ve got a 3.9 Tb zpool, and it is casing kernel panics on my Solaris
10 280r (SPARC) server.
The message I get on panic is this:
panic[cpu1]/thread=2a100a95cc0: zfs: freeing free segment
(offset=423713792 size=1024)
This seems to come about when the zpool is being used or being
scrubbed - about twice a day at the moment. After the reboot, the
scrub seems to have