Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "objectvt".
Did you mean:
objects
2007 Sep 28
0
[LLVMdev] Lowering operations to 8-bit!
On Sep 28, 2007, at 11:36 AM, <Alireza.Moshtaghi at microchip.com>
<Alireza.Moshtaghi at microchip.com> wrote:
> I moved my code to 2.1 but still the same.
> If I make ADD i16 legal, then it goes through, but it has problem
> expanding it to i8.
> Should I go ahead and customize it and do the same for all
> instructions?
> Or there is a more general thing that I
2007 Sep 28
2
[LLVMdev] Lowering operations to 8-bit!
I moved my code to 2.1 but still the same.
If I make ADD i16 legal, then it goes through, but it has problem
expanding it to i8.
Should I go ahead and customize it and do the same for all instructions?
Or there is a more general thing that I can do?
A.
-----Original Message-----
From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu]
On Behalf Of Chris Lattner
Sent:
2007 Sep 28
2
[LLVMdev] Lowering operations to 8-bit!
...tNumValues();
std::cout<<"----------------- "<<__FUNCTION__<<" handling
FORMAL_ARGUMENTS of"<<Fn->getName()<<std::endl;std::cout.flush();
for (unsigned ArgNo = 0, e = Op.Val->getNumValues()-1; ArgNo != e;
++ArgNo) {
MVT::ValueType ObjectVT = Op.getValue(ArgNo).getValueType();
switch (ObjectVT){
default: assert(0 && "Unhandled argument type!");
case MVT::i32: cout<<"------------ i32"<<std::endl;break;
case MVT::i64: cout<<"------------ i64"<<std::endl;b...