search for: objectstreamer

...ammer to do ballpeen > work..... But when in Rome.... :-) Hi Jason, Are you printing ELF symbols and sections with AsmPrinter? I was under the impression that you'd create an MCPrinter to deal with the format-independent and only use AsmPrinter/ELFPrinter for specific calls (to AsmStreamer/ObjectStreamer). Or maybe I got it all wrong... cheers, --renato

Hi, I have kept working on this and found the following (as llvm 3.5): 1) In the function MCObjectStreamer::EmitInstruction there is a check for the instruction being relaxable or not: if (!Assembler.getBackend().mayNeedRelaxation(Inst)) { EmitInstToData(Inst, STI); return; } At this stage, the instruction as been already selected to be ARM::ADR. The call to mayNeed 2015-07-07 18:06 GMT+03:...

Hi All, A self-follow up and rephrase of my previous question with updated subject: What I want to do is to analyze hand-written assembly code with 'full details' where semantics of each instruction can be known in LLVM passes. Many of such instructions have no corresponding counterparts in IR/MIR forms, such as 'syscall' 'iret', etc. At MC level, such assembly code can

Together with Jan Sjodin (in copy of this email), we begin an implementation of the JIT with MC. The idea, suggested by Jan, is to develop a MCJIT in parallel of the current JIT and to keep the two implementations until (at least) the new MC one is mature enough. Currently code is kept on gitorious (http://gitorious.org/llvm-mc-jit/llvm-mc-jit). Following this, a boolean "bool MCJIT =

On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 7:50 AM, Rafael Espíndola <rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote: >> Hmm, I wish we had this discussion way earlier.. >> >> How would I emit things in different subsections? I can do a high >> level switch to .ARM.attributes, and if I were emitting one blob from >> begin to end, using the higher level interface would be preferable,

> Hmm, I wish we had this discussion way earlier.. > > How would I emit things in different subsections? I can do a high > level switch to .ARM.attributes, and if I were emitting one blob from > begin to end, using the higher level interface would be preferable, > but it contains additional subsections - which are naturally > represented by MCDataFragments - Is there an MC

Some boring style comments: - whack trailing whitespace - spaces, not tabs - the methods in MCJITStreamer.cpp should probably have blank lines between them There seems to be an ownership problem of the MCJITObjectWriter. If I understand the code correctly, the assembler Finish method takes ownership of the Writer parameter, which presumably is needed to JIT two functions. +1 for separate

...ot really clear, but with the patch : - If no Writer is provided to the Finish method, the MCAssembler takes ownership of the Writer it creates - If a Writer is provided, the ownership is not taken by MCAssembler > Ok. We could also make the streamer setup the right ObjectWriter, > since the ObjectStreamer should always know what that is. Yep ! It will clarify the ownership thing. But my patch was to disturb as little as possible the other streamers. I can implement it like this if you prefer. > +1 for separate patches, or alternatively, can we just commit this and > begin developing this in...