Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "objectore".
Did you mean:
objectors
2019 Mar 15
4
Scalable Vector Types in IR - Next Steps?
Hi David,
> We tried two round tables at the Nov. LLVMDev and no serious objections
> were raised, but we knew we didn't have all the right people there. I
> am somewhat skeptical another roundtable without commitment to attend
> from all able parties ahead of time will accomplish much.
Agreed, but I'll try scheduling one anyway.
> Speaking for myself (and not Cray), it
2013 Oct 28
1
[heads up] axing AppleTalk and IPX/SPX
Hello!
[Cc to stable@, for wider audience]
The plan is two axe two old networking protocols from FreeBSD head/,
meaning that FreeBSD 11.0-RELEASE, available in couple of years would
be shipped without them.
1) AppleTalk
Last time claimed to be supported by vendor in 2007[1]. In practice
had very little use since 90th.
Discontinued by major routing equipment vendors since 2009[2].
2004 Oct 26
0
R and objet database
Does anyone has already tried to use R with an object database such as
O2 or objectore, or versant ?
Does anyone knows an api to store R object in such a database and to
load R object from such a database ?
--------------------------------------------------------
Ce message et toutes les pieces jointes peuvent etre confidentiels, et, de plus, peuvent etre couverts par un privi...
2019 Mar 14
2
Scalable Vector Types in IR - Next Steps?
> On Mar 14, 2019, at 5:45 AM, Graham Hunter via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
> We would like to be able to reach consensus on an approach around the end
> of EuroLLVM this year so that we can begin a full implementation.
EuroLLVM will be a very good occasion to hear all the opinions and reach consensus on the approach.
@Graham, maybe you should set up a
2019 Oct 25
21
RFC: Switching from Bugzilla to Github Issues
We held a round-table at the llvm dev conference about what other pieces of
Github infrastructure we may want to use. This thread in particular is
about switching to github issue tracking. Use of other parts of Github
functionality was also discussed -- but that should be for other email
threads.
Most of the ideas here were from other people. I *believe* this proposal
represents the overall
2019 Jan 22
20
[RFC] migrating past C++11
Hello fans of the auto keyword!
We now have a policy on how LLVM toolchains get updated <https://reviews.llvm.org/rL351765>! Let’s put that policy to good use, and talk about how we’ll move all monorepo projects past C++11.
Previous Discussions
LLVM dev meeting 2018 BoF "Migrating to C++14, and beyond! <http://llvm.org/devmtg/2018-10/talk-abstracts.html#bof3>"
A Short