search for: objectionable

I have an upcoming install which places the switch close to some employees in a quiet work environment. Can anyone recommend a quiet 24 port POE switch? The Linksys SRW224P behind me right now would be objectionable, I'm sure. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20070103/b9ee4d7f/attachment.htm

...nd would be a key advantage here. This seems kind of counterintuitive to me- can people even ABX human speech at a 32 or even 24kHz sample rate from speech at 48kHz, much less hear a large quality difference? A number of audiobooks I've listened to have used 22kHz mp3s without being clearly objectionable, and in my personal use I've had decent results using the -voice LAME setting (downsamples to 32kHz and encodes as 56kbps abr). The recent hydrogenaudio tests showed Opus CELT modes trumping the best of breed high-latency codecs at 64kbps despite having only 22.5 ms latency, and the SILK m...

...following patches were made over Linus's tree and apply over next. They > allow the vhost layer to use copy_process instead of using > workqueue_structs to create worker threads for VM's devices. Ok, all these patches looked fine to me from a quick scan - nothing that I reacted to as objectionable, and several of them looked like nice cleanups. The only one I went "Why do you do it that way" for was in 10/11 (entirely internal to vhost, so I don't feel too strongly about this) how you made "struct vhost_worker" be a pointer in "struct vhost_dev". It _looks...

...Then I tried some bitstream rate changes 128Kbps, 64Kbps, and 32Kbps. 128K and 64K are fine. 32K is *terrible*. Really, really horrendous. Is this expected? Is there a program I can run to estimate the error or something? I expected degradation, but this just falls off a cliff with really objectionable artifacts. My application is going into the embedded space, so I'm quite a bit resource conscious. It's not that I couldn't live with 64kbps, but every factor of 2 helps. By the way, celtenc needs some better error messages. If you don't compile celt with "--enable-cus...

Robert's suggestion indeed fixed the problem. I kept thinking those entries were necessary in inetd.conf. Also, kind thanks to Fred Gilbert for his prompt responses.:-) John

Unless others find this objectionable, it would be nice to see the grammar for metadata instruction attachment in the http://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html#metadata section. The grammar you gave earlier seems to work. Garrison On Feb 15, 2010, at 16:17, David Greene wrote: > On Monday 15 February 2010 15:08:22 Chris Lattner wrote: &g...

On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 1:46 PM, Daniel Dunbar <daniel at zuster.org> wrote: > - Please split the patch into at least four parts: > (1) Add WinCOFFStreamer, with a stub implementation. > (2) Add WinCOFFObjectWriter, with a stub implementation. > (3) Fill in WinCOFFStreamer. > (4) Fill in WinCOFFObjectWriter. 3rd patch

This probably needs to be slightly tweaked to work with mainline. I don't see anything objectionable, but I think Daniel needs to review this one. Thanks for working on this Michael! -Chris On Jul 3, 2010, at 3:19 AM, Michael Spencer wrote: > On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 1:46 PM, Daniel Dunbar <daniel at zuster.org> wrote: >> - Please split the patch into at least four parts: >&gt...

...e. *I* had no problem with the (somewhat) inappropriate nature of his response and did nothing more than thank him for taking the time and educating me on some of the conventions in place in the Linux (*IX?) community today. I *propose* that this should be the normal response to certain perceived objectionable behavior, as a courtesy to the rest of the list. Why? Selfishness. I get tired of <DEL> <DEL> <DEL> ... on the crap that follows. *If* there was any chance that one's objectionable behavior would be improved by pointing out various transgressions and/or lapses in etiquette, I...

...m> wrote: > Beyond that, though, I've hit one hierarchy in the Static Analyzer > that does this as well: ProgramPoint. On IRC Jordan Rose mentioned > that there's another more pervasive use of this pattern in the Static > Analyzer, the SVal hierarchy. > > So, Ted, how objectionable would it be for me to introduce something > like (names subject to adjustment): > > template<typename T> > T SVal::castAs(); > > template<typename T> > llvm::Optional<T> SVal::getAs(); > > (the implementations of these functions might involve invoking...

...pty matches both for sake of consistency with the rest of the language (missing data does not yield a dropped index in other sorts of R functions, and an empty match conceptually corresponds with missing data) and facility of use in data.frames. The behavior of regmatches(..., gregexpr(...)) is not objectionable to me, as lists do not drop indices when they contain character(0) vectors. Alternatively, perhaps this should be reflected in the (currently non-exported) strextract. Best, CG

Hello, Just want to tap the collective wisdom of this list as to experiences pertaining to the Handytone HT488 and the Sipura SPA-3000 adapters... Basically I'm looking for a FXO/FXS/LAN ATA and these two seems to be the top of the pick..Any comments and experiences esp. with Asterisk compatibility would be great, before I plonk in the bucks. TIA. /wai-sun

...ge there)) but otherwise seems achievable. Beyond that, though, I've hit one hierarchy in the Static Analyzer that does this as well: ProgramPoint. On IRC Jordan Rose mentioned that there's another more pervasive use of this pattern in the Static Analyzer, the SVal hierarchy. So, Ted, how objectionable would it be for me to introduce something like (names subject to adjustment): template<typename T> T SVal::castAs(); template<typename T> llvm::Optional<T> SVal::getAs(); (the implementations of these functions might involve invoking private FooSVal(SVal) ctors in each SVal der...

Is anyone bothered by the compiler warnings that indicate that the format strings don't match the associated variables? I was, so I cast most of the objectionable args (pids, uids, gids) to "long", and added an "l" (el) to the format string. A single item was cast to an int. Here's the patch. If you haven't applied my UseLogin patch, the line numbers in session.c will be offset by -16 lines. ..wayne.. ---8<------8<-----...

...trolling instructions (conditional jumps, switch cases, computed gotos, etc), and both of these options seem to require changes/enhancements, but which of them allows for the rest of the analysis and optimization phases of LLVM to continue with the least amount of change ?, or with the least objectionable change ?, or with the least complicating and least counter-intuitive change ? option (2) is what analysis and optimization algorithms require, namely complete and exact control flow and data flow information. option (1) is what your mental run-time model wants, namely a fairly simple mat...

..., I feel I need to post my long story and ask help. Shortly after the release announcement, I kicked off rtorrent and downloaded the CD and DVD images. Since my cable provider does my "throttling", I disabled throttling and shared for several days, "returning" several GBs at no objectionable loss I could discern. While that was going on, I used cdrecord (don't jump to conclusions here, read on) via CLI to burn the CDs. This on a fully-up-to-date CentOS... well here uname -a Linux centos01.homegroannetworking 2.6.9-42.0.10.EL #1 Tue Feb 27 09:24:42 EST 2007 i686 athlon...

...g=800, Mark 2 echo canceller, aggressive cancellation OFF, bugs.digium.com #2820 patch, RX=8.0, TX=-1.0. Still have echo. Aggressive mode helps a bit but then the other persons voice get's cut off a lot especially when I talk and the cutting in and out of the canceller is more noticeable and objectionable in general than if Aggressive is turned off. I have two SIP phones. An Aastra 9133i and a Grandstream GXP2000. Echo problem is the same on both phones. I am located within a metropolitan area in Canada. Any comments and/or suggestions would be greatly appreciated as I am pretty much out...

...NOT reply directly to this message! Message ID: 323313178000000003-3-308250001 ********** MailWatch has scanned your e-mail message and determined it can not be delivered as originally sent. MailWatch can help you avoid these problems in the future by scanning your e-mail for viruses, Spam and objectionable content. Visit http://www.MailWatch.com to read about the benefits of MailWatch. **********

On Tue, 12 May 2020 at 06:28, Alex Deucher <alexdeucher at gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 4:22 PM Al Dunsmuir <al.dunsmuir at sympatico.ca> wrote: > > > > On Monday, May 11, 2020, 1:17:19 PM, "Christian K?nig" wrote: > > > Hi guys, > > > > > Well let's face it AGP is a total headache to maintain and dead for at

> On Jan 9, 2017, at 12:47 PM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote: > > On 9 January 2017 at 19:04, Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com> wrote: >> This is not correct according to the number of “should” and the imperative tone for many aspects of http://llvm.org/docs/CodingStandards.html#source-code-formatting > > You mistake the tone of the