Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "object_tmp".
2010 Aug 20
3
[LLVMdev] using external functions from llvm
...name the function as you please (with some reasonable
restrictions on the character set, etc)
> I'm now running into trouble when trying to access arguments however.
> printing args.size() from the function yields 12105250188025543488. The
> generated call to it looks like:
>
> %object_tmp = call %object_structure* @lle_X_create_number_object(double
> 5.000000e+00) ; <%object_structure*> [#uses=1]
You are calling a function that takes a single argument of type
`double'. But on a previous post you showed the function with this
signature:
llvm::GenericValue
lle_X_create_...
2010 Aug 20
0
[LLVMdev] using external functions from llvm
...nce possible to call external functions as I was originally trying, or, why
did the blog post think it was possible?)
I'm now running into trouble when trying to access arguments however.
printing args.size() from the function yields 12105250188025543488. The
generated call to it looks like:
%object_tmp = call %object_structure* @lle_X_create_number_object(double
5.000000e+00) ; <%object_structure*> [#uses=1]
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 6:56 PM, Alec Benzer <alecbenzer at gmail.com> wrote:
> The blog post I linked to implied that adding a symbol in the form
> lle_X_FUNCTIONNAME wo...
2010 Aug 20
0
[LLVMdev] using external functions from llvm
...ith some reasonable
> restrictions on the character set, etc)
>
> > I'm now running into trouble when trying to access arguments however.
> > printing args.size() from the function yields 12105250188025543488. The
> > generated call to it looks like:
> >
> > %object_tmp = call %object_structure* @lle_X_create_number_object(double
> > 5.000000e+00) ; <%object_structure*> [#uses=1]
>
> You are calling a function that takes a single argument of type
> `double'. But on a previous post you showed the function with this
> signature:
>
>...
2010 Aug 19
3
[LLVMdev] using external functions from llvm
The blog post I linked to implied that adding a symbol in the form
lle_X_FUNCTIONNAME would allow you to call a function called FUNCTIONNAME.
Is this not the case?
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 6:46 PM, <o.j.sivart at gmail.com> wrote:
> You are adding the symbol as "lle_X_create_number_object" yet your error
> message implies you have tried to lookup and use