search for: object_root

Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "object_root".

2004 Apr 26
0
[LLVMdev] x86 cogen quality
...path? >> >> > After configure and make I run make install, which moves the executables > to /usr/local/bin, right ? And yes, they are in my path. I am not sure if the "make install" target will work as expected. Generally, we compile LLVM and set our paths to the OBJECT_ROOT/tools/Debug directory (as described in the LLVM "Getting Started" guide). I seem to recall that someone added some support for the install target, but I don't know if it is complete. If any work as been done, it has probably been registered in BugZilla as an enhancement. >...
2004 Apr 26
2
[LLVMdev] x86 cogen quality
Chris Lattner wrote: >I can't reproduce this failure with mainline CVS using either lli or llc: > >$ lli -regalloc=linearscan a.out.bc >$ echo $status >0 > >Are you sure that the CVS version is in your path? > > After configure and make I run make install, which moves the executables to /usr/local/bin, right ? And yes, they are in my path. But thank you very
2004 May 03
3
[LLVMdev] Plea for help
...gt; After configure and make I run make install, which moves the executables >> to /usr/local/bin, right ? And yes, they are in my path. > > > I am not sure if the "make install" target will work as expected. > Generally, we compile LLVM and set our paths to the > OBJECT_ROOT/tools/Debug directory (as described in the LLVM "Getting > Started" guide). I seem to recall that someone added some support for > the install target, but I don't know if it is complete. If any work > as been done, it has probably been registered in BugZilla as an >...
2004 May 03
0
[LLVMdev] Plea for help
...n make install, which moves the executables >>> to /usr/local/bin, right ? And yes, they are in my path. >> >> >> >> I am not sure if the "make install" target will work as expected. >> Generally, we compile LLVM and set our paths to the >> OBJECT_ROOT/tools/Debug directory (as described in the LLVM "Getting >> Started" guide). I seem to recall that someone added some support for >> the install target, but I don't know if it is complete. If any work >> as been done, it has probably been registered in BugZilla...