Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "object_root".
2004 Apr 26
0
[LLVMdev] x86 cogen quality
...path?
>>
>>
> After configure and make I run make install, which moves the executables
> to /usr/local/bin, right ? And yes, they are in my path.
I am not sure if the "make install" target will work as expected.
Generally, we compile LLVM and set our paths to the
OBJECT_ROOT/tools/Debug directory (as described in the LLVM "Getting
Started" guide). I seem to recall that someone added some support for
the install target, but I don't know if it is complete. If any work as
been done, it has probably been registered in BugZilla as an enhancement.
>...
2004 Apr 26
2
[LLVMdev] x86 cogen quality
Chris Lattner wrote:
>I can't reproduce this failure with mainline CVS using either lli or llc:
>
>$ lli -regalloc=linearscan a.out.bc
>$ echo $status
>0
>
>Are you sure that the CVS version is in your path?
>
>
After configure and make I run make install, which moves the executables
to /usr/local/bin, right ? And yes, they are in my path.
But thank you very
2004 May 03
3
[LLVMdev] Plea for help
...gt; After configure and make I run make install, which moves the executables
>> to /usr/local/bin, right ? And yes, they are in my path.
>
>
> I am not sure if the "make install" target will work as expected.
> Generally, we compile LLVM and set our paths to the
> OBJECT_ROOT/tools/Debug directory (as described in the LLVM "Getting
> Started" guide). I seem to recall that someone added some support for
> the install target, but I don't know if it is complete. If any work
> as been done, it has probably been registered in BugZilla as an
>...
2004 May 03
0
[LLVMdev] Plea for help
...n make install, which moves the executables
>>> to /usr/local/bin, right ? And yes, they are in my path.
>>
>>
>>
>> I am not sure if the "make install" target will work as expected.
>> Generally, we compile LLVM and set our paths to the
>> OBJECT_ROOT/tools/Debug directory (as described in the LLVM "Getting
>> Started" guide). I seem to recall that someone added some support for
>> the install target, but I don't know if it is complete. If any work
>> as been done, it has probably been registered in BugZilla...