Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "objctxt".
2012 Oct 30
2
[LLVMdev] Status of YAML IO?
....g. tag: type) which YAML I/O already supports, then there is no need for tags and no need for an additional mechanism in YAML I/O.
So, I know have the traits set up to support archives assuming the first (option) key of each document type read by lld will be "kind:". The archive-basic.objctxt case now looks like:
# RUN: lld-core %s | FileCheck %s
#
# Tests archives in YAML. Tests that an undefined in a regular file will load
# all atoms in select archive members.
#
---
defined-atoms:
- name: foo
type: code
undefined-atoms:
- name:...
2012 Oct 30
0
[LLVMdev] Status of YAML IO?
...I/O already supports, then there is no
> need for tags and no need for an additional mechanism in YAML I/O.
>
> So, I know have the traits set up to support archives assuming the
> first (option) key of each document type read by lld will be "kind:".
> The archive-basic.objctxt case now looks like:
>
> # RUN: lld-core %s | FileCheck %s
>
> #
> # Tests archives in YAML. Tests that an undefined in a regular file
> will load
> # all atoms in select archive members.
> #
>
> ---
> defined-atoms:
> - name: foo
> type:...
2012 Oct 25
0
[LLVMdev] Status of YAML IO?
> To better understand how a client would use YAML I/O. I've completely rewritten the ReaderYAML and WriterYAML in lld to use YAML I/O. The source code is now about half the size. But more importantly, the error checking is much, much better and any time an attribute (e.g. of an Atom) is changed or added, there is just one place to update the yaml code instead of two places (the reader
2012 Oct 25
3
[LLVMdev] Status of YAML IO?
On Oct 22, 2012, at 5:07 PM, Nick Kledzik wrote:
> On Oct 22, 2012, at 4:40 PM, Sean Silva wrote:
>> Hey Nick, what's the status on YAML IO? The other thread seems to have died.
>
> I'm waiting on Michael Spencer's feedback.
To better understand how a client would use YAML I/O. I've completely rewritten the ReaderYAML and WriterYAML in lld to use YAML I/O. The
2012 Oct 30
2
[LLVMdev] Status of YAML IO?
...ich YAML I/O already supports, then there is no need for tags and no need for an additional mechanism in YAML I/O.
>>
>> So, I know have the traits set up to support archives assuming the first (option) key of each document type read by lld will be "kind:". The archive-basic.objctxt case now looks like:
>>
>> # RUN: lld-core %s | FileCheck %s
>>
>> #
>> # Tests archives in YAML. Tests that an undefined in a regular file will load
>> # all atoms in select archive members.
>> #
>>
>> ---
>> defined-atoms:
>>...