search for: obel

...2 are demoted with probs > (dc-01 and dc-02 both centos6) and 2 are running (dc-10 and dc-11 on > centos 7) > > dc-11 has all fsmo. joining with the old dc-01 and dc-02 doesn´t even > work. > > dc-01 joins but gives me this: > > Deleted > CN=DC-01,CN=Servers,CN=Obel-und-Partner,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=obel,DC=lan > Adding CN=DC-01,OU=Domain Controllers,DC=obel,DC=lan > Adding > CN=DC-01,CN=Servers,CN=Obel-und-Partner,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=obel,DC=lan > Adding CN=NTDS > Settings,CN=DC-01,CN=Servers,CN=Obel-und-Partner,CN=Sites,CN=Conf...

...ome strange behaviour? Look here: installing the sernet 4.7 as mentioned above I can´t join the domain in a regular way. ONLY it works when I asked BOTH of the working DCs with 4.9.3 before I try without explicit naming of a server... ^^ Follow me here: [root at dc-02 etc]# samba-tool domain join obel.lan DC -U"OBEL\administrator" --realm=obel.lan --server=dc-10 Password for [OBEL\administrator]: workgroup is OBEL realm is obel.lan Adding CN=DC-02,OU=Domain Controllers,DC=obel,DC=lan Adding CN=DC-02,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=obel,DC=lan Join fai...

Thanks Rowloand for the hint! I installed sernet-samba 4.7 and give it a try. Now I get: [root at dc-12 1]# samba-tool domain join obel.lan DC --realm=obel.lan -Uadministrator Finding a writeable DC for domain 'obel.lan' Found DC dc-11.obel.lan Password for [OBEL\administrator]: workgroup is OBEL realm is obel.lan Adding CN=DC-12,OU=Domain Controllers,DC=obel,DC=lan Adding CN=DC-12,CN=Servers,CN=Obel-und-Partner,CN=Sites,CN...

On Wed, 12 Dec 2018 15:43:09 +0100 peter grotz via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > I forgot: this is samba 4.9.3 on centos 7 Where did you get Samba 4.9.3 from ? > > Thanks > > > Hello, > > I got a problem with adding an new dc to a domain. when I try to join > I get the following: What are the other DC(s) ? Rowland

...on. There are 4 DCs (all with last sernet-rpms) 2 are demoted with probs (dc-01 and dc-02 both centos6) and 2 are running (dc-10 and dc-11 on centos 7) dc-11 has all fsmo. joining with the old dc-01 and dc-02 doesn´t even work. dc-01 joins but gives me this: Deleted CN=DC-01,CN=Servers,CN=Obel-und-Partner,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=obel,DC=lan Adding CN=DC-01,OU=Domain Controllers,DC=obel,DC=lan Adding CN=DC-01,CN=Servers,CN=Obel-und-Partner,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=obel,DC=lan Adding CN=NTDS Settings,CN=DC-01,CN=Servers,CN=Obel-und-Partner,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=obel,DC=lan...

Hello, I got a problem with adding an new dc to a domain. when I try to join I get the following: [root at dc-12 etc]# samba-tool domain join obel.lan DC -Uadministrator --server=dc-11 Password for [OBEL\administrator]: workgroup is OBEL realm is obel.lan Adding CN=DC-12,OU=Domain Controllers,DC=obel,DC=lan Adding CN=DC-12,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=obel,DC=lan Join failed - cleaning up Deleted CN=DC-1...

...two endpoints of the vpn the gateways have a transparent dns-proxy which forwarded my dns-request not the wanted dns-server but sent not-found-answers pretending to be the intended ns. Not easy to find such a pitfall :( Thanks again, -Peter -----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht----- Von: Peter Grotz - Obel und Partner GbR [mailto:grotz at obel-architekten.de] Gesendet: Sonntag, 31. August 2014 02:14 An: samba at lists.samba.org Betreff: Re: [Samba] Samba 4 dns-resolv-prob with different subnets Hello Louis, > Datum: Fri, 29 Aug 2014 15:17:44 +0200 > Von: "L.P.H. van Belle" <bell...

...elle at bazuin.nl> > An: "samba at lists.samba.org" <samba at lists.samba.org> > Betreff: Re: [Samba] Samba 4 dns-resolv-prob with different subnets > pleast post your > /etc/hosts on dc-01: 127.0.0.1 localhost localhost.localdomain 192.168.0.101 dc-01 dc-01.obel.lan on dc-02: 127.0.0.1 localhost localhost.localdomain 192.168.1.100 dc-02 dc-02.obel.lan > /etc/resolv.conf on dc-02 192.168.1.100 (dns-resolution works): search obel.lan nameserver 192.168.1.100 nameserver 192.168.1.102 #def gateway on subnet 192.168.1.0 on dc-01 192.168.0.101 (dns...

...g to connect from a windows box (KRIKKIT), the logfile says the following (smbd runs in -d3). It doesn't seem to matter if the user (tom) has a local unix account or not: [2010/05/26 11:00:17, 3] libsmb/namequery_dc.c:199(rpc_dc_name) rpc_dc_name: Returning DC IO (130.95.136.177) for domain OBEL [2010/05/26 11:00:17, 3] libsmb/cliconnect.c:2031(cli_start_connection) Connecting to host=IO [2010/05/26 11:00:17, 3] lib/util_sock.c:1025(open_socket_out_send) Connecting to 130.95.136.177 at port 445 [2010/05/26 11:00:17, 3] lib/util_sock.c:1025(open_socket_out_send) Connecting to 130.9...

> On 21/04/15 09:17, Peter Grotz - Obel und Partner GbR wrote: > > Hallo, > > > > > > > > samba 4.2 is released for some time now. Sernet usually doesn?t take a lot > > of time to release their new packages. > > > > But now we haven?t heard a peep from them. Are they gone or will there b...

...default/Type1" "4" = "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/Type1" [WinMM] "Drivers" = "wineoss.drv" "WaveMapper" = "msacm.drv" "MidiMapper" = "midimap.drv" # </wineconf> -- Mvh. / Kind regards Henrik Farre (enrique@obel.auc.dk) Webpage: http://Welcome.to/Webbench -If I where God, I would recompile the penguin with --enable-flying.

Hallo, samba 4.2 is released for some time now. Sernet usually doesn?t take a lot of time to release their new packages. But now we haven?t heard a peep from them. Are they gone or will there be another fine release? In great expectation of a fine new sernet-samba-package-release -Peter

Hello, I?m using one Samba4-dc ?d-02? (IP 192.168.1.100) on subnet (192.168.1.0). Internal dns works for clients and other servers at subnet 192.168.1.0. Now I want to join another dc ?dc-01? (IP 192.168.0.101) at subnet 192.168.0.0 which is connect over routed openvpn. Ping the first dc an vice versa works but ?host ?v dc-02? results in the following message: Trying ?dc-02? Host

...allow-mschapv2 --request-nt-key --username=%{%{Stripped-User-Name}:-%{%{User-Name}:-None}} --domain=NTDOM --challenge=%{%{mschap:Challenge}:-00} --nt-response=%{%{mschap:NT-Response}:-00}: (0) mschap: EXPAND --username=%{%{Stripped-User-Name}:-%{%{User-Name}:-None}} (0) mschap: --> --username=obell (0) mschap: mschap1: d4 (0) mschap: EXPAND --challenge=%{%{mschap:Challenge}:-00} (0) mschap: --> --challenge=changedChallenge (0) mschap: EXPAND --nt-response=%{%{mschap:NT-Response}:-00} (0) mschap: --> --nt-response=ChangedResponce (0) mschap: ERROR: Program returned code (1) and ou...

...[mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens Rowland Penny >> Verzonden: dinsdag 21 april 2015 16:51 Aan: >> samba at lists.samba.org Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] sernet = dead? >> >> On 21/04/15 15:45, Thomas Schulz wrote: >>>> On 21/04/15 09:17, Peter Grotz - Obel und Partner GbR wrote: >>>>> Hallo, >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> samba 4.2 is released for some time now. Sernet usually >> doesn???t take a lot >>>>> of time to release their new packages. >>>&gt...

Lol... I dont know.. and i did learn know most from you :-P And you have reset the idmap? Greetz, .. hihi... Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens Rowland penny > Verzonden: vrijdag 29 januari 2016 16:22 > Aan: samba at lists.samba.org > Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] Validate Ids Multiple DC > > On 29/01/16

...irst set the UNIX UID, klik apply. Now set the profiles path, it should result in # file: home/samba/profiles/username.V6 # owner: username # group: domain\040users user::rwx user:username:rwx group::--- group:2005:rwx group:domain\040users:--- mask::rwx other::--- default:user::rwx default:user:obell:rwx default:group::--- default:group:2005:rwx default:group:domain\040users:--- default:mask::rwx default:other::--- Do note the UID 2005, that is the one that created the folder. ( user : SYSTEM ) Greetz, Louis > > > The problem isn't whether 'Domain Admins' has a gi...

...at googlemail.com >[mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens Rowland Penny >Verzonden: dinsdag 21 april 2015 16:51 >Aan: samba at lists.samba.org >Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] sernet = dead? > >On 21/04/15 15:45, Thomas Schulz wrote: >>> On 21/04/15 09:17, Peter Grotz - Obel und Partner GbR wrote: >>>> Hallo, >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> samba 4.2 is released for some time now. Sernet usually >doesn???t take a lot >>>> of time to release their new packages. >>>> >>>> But now...

...unces at lists.samba.org] Namens Rowland Penny >>> Verzonden: dinsdag 21 april 2015 16:51 Aan: >>> samba at lists.samba.org Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] sernet = dead? >>> >>> On 21/04/15 15:45, Thomas Schulz wrote: >>>>> On 21/04/15 09:17, Peter Grotz - Obel und Partner GbR wrote: >>>>>> Hallo, >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> samba 4.2 is released for some time now. Sernet usually >>> doesn???t take a lot >>>>>> of time to release their new...

Ah.. A misunderstanding.. i dont pull from ldap. I abuse settings. I use UID/GID from AD, only the UID/GID, dont really care about the others. But i do obey some rules.. i'll explain. This on the DC: getent passwd obell myuser:*:10002:10000:L.P.H. van Belle:/home/users/ myuser:/bin/bash Its bit diffent on the member. getent passwd myuser myuser:*:10002:10000::/home/users/ myuser:/bin/bash but ! on the member running only getent passwd | grep myuser ( results same again as the DC ) myuser:*:10002:10000:L.P.H....