search for: o_unlink

Hi everyone, Thanks all for your feedback. Here is a reply to most of your comments.... Roger. Chris Evans wrote: > On Mon, 9 Mar 1998, Rogier Wolff wrote: > > not to give those rights away. A non-setuid program should not have to > > worry about buffer overruns (you can crash the program, wow!). It > Just a reminder, that in some cases, it _should_ worry. As a

...cious" means that they won''t > undergo code changes. They won''t adhere to coding standards/coding > changes that you propose. Please reread my message more carefully. I suggested several ways to achieve private namespaces for temporary files, and only one of these (the O_UNLINK suggestion) required coding changes in the program which actually creates/uses the temp file. The other suggestions operate at a system level (new fs type), a directory level (new mode on directories) or whatever level you like (private namespace access passed by fd). I think the final suggestion...