Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "o999".
Did you mean:
1999
2004 Aug 06
2
patch for libspeex
...ple wave
file at http://dagobah.ucc.asn.au/speextest/sample.wav if anybody
wants to compare times.
I'm curious now why my machine is slower - perhaps it's something
about the way I've compiled it. (Compiles by default with -O2, and I
can slice another .07 seconds off by compiling with -O999 :)
> Sending it to the list is a good idea I think. If you want to know what
> the code does... it's simply calculating the distance between an input
> vector and a list of vectors (codebook) and it returns the id's of the N
> closest (n-best) codebook vectors.
Thanks. I'm...
2004 Aug 06
0
patch for libspeex
...agobah.ucc.asn.au/speextest/sample.wav if anybody
> wants to compare times.
>
> I'm curious now why my machine is slower - perhaps it's something
> about the way I've compiled it. (Compiles by default with -O2, and I
> can slice another .07 seconds off by compiling with -O999 :)
Maybe not everything got re-compiled and some parts were left with -g or
something? With the files you sent, I get (on my PIII 1 GHz, with -O3):
speexenc --comp 3 --quality 3 sample.wav sample.spx
0,65s user 0,00s system 100% cpu 0,647 total
trange...
> Thanks. I'm beginning to grasp i...
2004 Aug 06
2
patch for libspeex
...iled and some parts were left with -g or
> something? With the files you sent, I get (on my PIII 1 GHz, with -O3):
> speexenc --comp 3 --quality 3 sample.wav sample.spx
> 0,65s user 0,00s system 100% cpu 0,647 total
>
> strange...
I'm recompiling the lot, no debugging, -O3 (or -O999). The packaged
speex1.0beta3 from debian runs in about the same time. I'll just
blame it on some weird quirk of my laptop. Thanks though.
> > at the codebook search - next culprit on the list as given by gprof
> > (and OPTIMIZE :)
>
> This part is a bit more obscure, but I t...
2004 Aug 06
2
patch for libspeex
I have a patch for libspeex, which optimises some of the loops in
vq_nbest and vq_nbest_sign that speeds up encoding - my results:
test file: 10s wav file at 16000 Hz, mono
encoding with wideband --quality 3, --comp 3
machine: PIII-900Mhz, 256MB RAM
before: 2.78s after: 2.38s
I'm still trying to grasp the code (I'm just a coder, no background
in sound processing), and just optimised