search for: o7

Hi, i try several possibilities adn looking in the archive, but didn't getting success to install j.lindsey's usefuel "library repeated" on my linux (suse9.0 with kernel 2.6.7,R.1.9.1) P.S. Windows, works fine Many thanks for help Christian chris at linux:/space/downs> R CMD INSTALL - l /usr/lib/R/library repeated WARNING: invalid package '-' WARNING:

...rch/sparc/machine/asm.h @@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ #endif #define _ASM_LABEL(name) name -#ifdef PIC +#ifdef __PIC__ /* * PIC_PROLOGUE() is akin to the compiler generated function prologue for * PIC code. It leaves the address of the Global Offset Table in DEST, @@ -83,12 +83,20 @@ 0: \ add dest,%o7,dest; \ mov tmp, %o7 +#define SET(var,base,dest) \ + sethi %gdop_hix22(var), dest; \ + xor dest, %gdop_lox10(var), dest; \ + ldx [base + dest], dest, %gdop(var) #else #define PIC_PROLOGUE(dest,tmp) \ mov %o7,tmp; 3: call 4f; nop; 4: \ sethi %hi(_C_LABEL(_GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_)-(3b-.)),dest;...

...rch/sparc/machine/asm.h @@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ #endif #define _ASM_LABEL(name) name -#ifdef PIC +#ifdef __PIC__ /* * PIC_PROLOGUE() is akin to the compiler generated function prologue for * PIC code. It leaves the address of the Global Offset Table in DEST, @@ -83,12 +83,20 @@ 0: \ add dest,%o7,dest; \ mov tmp, %o7 +#define SET(var,base,dest) \ + sethi %gdop_hix22(var), dest; \ + xor dest, %gdop_lox10(var), dest; \ + ldx [base + dest], dest, %gdop(var) #else #define PIC_PROLOGUE(dest,tmp) \ mov %o7,tmp; 3: call 4f; nop; 4: \ sethi %hi(_C_LABEL(_GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_)-(3b-.)),dest;...

Hello! Can someone please help me in building debug version of klibc ? I've cloned git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/libs/klibc/klibc.git , but failed to build it with debug info added "-g" to HOSTCFLAGS in Makefile, but $ make -j KLIBCKERNELSRC=`pwd`/../linux-2.6/usr still strips every debug symbol , and i'm failed to change scripts/Kbuild.klibc and Makefile to remove strip

...ther standard register allocators > available. I haven't investigated the Sparc backend specifically but... My guess is this is related to this entry in SparcInstrInfo.td: let Uses = [O0, O1, O2, O3, O4, O5], hasDelaySlot = 1, isCall = 1, Defs = [O0, O1, O2, O3, O4, O5, O7, G1, G2, G3, G4, G5, G6, G7, D0, D1, D2, D3, D4, D5, D6, D7, D8, D9, D10, D11, D12, D13, D14, D15] in { def CALL : InstSP<(outs), (ins calltarget:$dst), "call $dst", []> { bits<30> disp; let op = 1; let Inst{29-0} =...

...IC_PROLOGUE() is akin to the compiler generated function prologue for + * PIC code. It leaves the address of the Global Offset Table in DEST, + * clobbering register TMP in the process. + * + * We can use two code sequences. We can read the %pc or use the call + * instruction that saves the pc in %o7. Call requires the branch unit and + * IEU1, and clobbers %o7 which needs to be restored. This instruction + * sequence takes about 4 cycles due to instruction interdependence. Reading + * the pc takes 4 cycles to dispatch and is always dispatched alone. That + * sequence takes 7 cycles. + */ +...

Hello, When I run LLC with option "-O0 -march=sparc" on following testcase, fast register allocator crashes with "UNREACHABLE executed" error. LLC generates code successfully with other standard register allocators available. $ cat call.ll define void @test() nounwind { entry: %0 = tail call i32 (...)* @foo() nounwind tail call void (...)* @bar() nounwind ret void }

...ty sector, also recently entering the Oil/Energy Industry! This company's st0ck is very much undervalued considering the potential of the industry and the position of the company. (The perfect time to get in) This small treasure is: VNBL (Vinoble, Inc.) The st0ck is trading at only O.O7 - O.09 cents and we expect it could hit $0.25 - $0.30 by early November. Huge PR campaign expected this week so grab as much as you can up to $0.20 range. We all know it's the big announcements that make these small gems move. =================================================== Compa...

Hi, is there a way in R to identify those cluster methods / distance measures which best reflect predefined cluster groups. Given 10 observations O1...O10. Optimally, these 10 observations cluster as follows: cluster1: O1, O2, O3, O4 cluster2: O5, O6 cluster3: O7, O8, O9, O10. What I want is a method which identifies that cluster method / distance measure which best reflect my predefined groups. Is that somehow possible to do? Cheers -- View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/Clustering-groups-tp2297210p2297210.html Sent from the R he...

When I run # dovecot --build-options I get: Build options: ioloop=epoll notify=inotify ipv6 openssl Mail storages: cydir dbox maildir mbox raw shared SQL driver plugins: mysql postgresql sqlite Passdb: checkpassword ldap pam passwd passwd-file shadow sql Userdb: nss ldap(plugin) passwd passwd-file prefetch sql static I don't see anything here mentioning Sieve. Does this mean that Sieve is

...%i2 = 0x0000000100321970 %o3 = 0x000000007efefeff %i3 = 0x00000001003218f0 %o4 = 0x0000000081010100 %i4 = 0x0000000000000000 %o5 = 0xffffffffffffffff %i5 = 0x00000001001aa0f0 %o6 = 0xffffffff7fffe271 %i6 = 0xffffffff7fffe351 %o7 = 0x000000010006daf4 cli_full_connection+0x58 %i7 = 0x000000010002fe64 connect_to_service+0xd4 %ccr = 0x44 xcc=nZvc icc=nZvc %y = 0x0000000000000000 %pc = 0xffffffff7e03d28c libc.so.1`strlen+0x7c %npc = 0xffffffff7e03d290 libc.so.1`strlen+0x80 %sp = 0xffffffff7fffe271 %fp = 0xffffffff7f...

...004982bc] Caller[000000000049baf0] Caller[0000000000419108] Caller[000000000049bbd0] Instruction DUMP: 98132028 7ffe8ff6 96102662 <91d02005> 13001695 15001693 19001696 901222b0 921263f0 >>PC; 0049da50 <__journal_remove_journal_head+f0/140> <===== >>O7; 0049da48 <__journal_remove_journal_head+e8/140> >>I7; 0049dad0 <journal_unlock_journal_head+30/80> Trace; 0049dad0 <journal_unlock_journal_head+30/80> Trace; 004982bc <journal_commit_transaction+6bc/1700> Trace; 0049baf0 <kjournald+1f0/2c0> Trace; 00419108 &lt...

Hello everyone, everytime I run on a puppet host: #puppet agent --test I see this commet: info: Applying configuration version ''000001'' then lets say I deploy a new package from my local repository, from which I would get a different configuration version. #puppet agent --test info: Applying configuration version ''000002'' ...question: is there a way to

Reid, I have one substantial change to suggest to this. I think the distinction between module-level and cross-module optimization is artificial and unnecessary in LLVM because transparent link-time optimization makes intra-module and cross-module optimizations indistiguishable. It *is* important to distinguish between fast and slow optimizations. Because of this, I would suggest a

...x0004a3bc 0x00000000 0x0004a3b8 g4-g5 0x00000000 0x0004a3c8 0x00000000 0x00000270 g6-g7 0x00000000 0x00000000 0x00000000 0xff272a00 o0-o1 0x00000000 0x00000000 0x00000000 0xfffffaf0 o2-o3 0x00000000 0x00000000 0x00000000 0xffbff798 o4-o5 0x00000000 0x00000000 0x00000000 0x0000002b o6-o7 0x00000000 0xffbfe920 0x00000000 0xff18f498 l0-l1 0x00000000 0x00000073 0x00000000 0x00000000 l2-l3 0x00000000 0x00000000 0x00000000 0x00001000 l4-l5 0x00000000 0x00000000 0x00000000 0x00000000 l6-l7 0x00000000 0xff236c99 0x00000000 0x00000000 i0-i1 0x00000000 0x0003365e 0x0000000...

...+! setjmp.S +! +! Basic setjmp/longjmp +! +! This code was based on the equivalent code in NetBSD +! + +! +! The jmp_buf contains the following entries: +! sp +! fp +! pc +! + .text + .align 4 + .global setjmp + .type setjmp, @function +setjmp: + stx %sp,[%o0+0] ! Callers stack pointer + stx %o7,[%o0+8] ! Return pc + stx %fp,[%o0+16] ! Frame pointer + retl ! Return + clr %o0 ! ...0 + + .size setjmp,.-setjmp + + + .globl longjmp + .type longjmp, @function +longjmp: + mov %o1, %g4 ! save return value + mov %o0, %g1 ! save target + ldx [%g1+16],%g5 ! get callers frame +1: + cmp %f...

...2", "n3", "n4", "n5", "n6", "n7", "n8", "n9", "nx", "o1", "o10", "o11", "o13", "o2", "o3", "o4", "o5", "o6", "o7", "o8", "o9", "ox", "p10", "p11", "p2", "p3", "p4", "p5", "p6", "p7", "p8", "p9", "px", "q1", "q10", "q11", "...

...00000001 %o2 = 0x0000000000000000 %i2 = 0x00052c30 %o3 = 0x000000000005af78 %i3 = 0x000254ac %o4 = 0x0000000000025478 %i4 = 0x00000000 %o5 = 0x00000000feb87a3c %i5 = 0xffbfeb34 %o6 = 0x00000000ffbfead0 %i6 = 0xffbfef38 %o7 = 0x0000000000020474 create_zfs_zonepath+0x80 %i7 = 0x0001a224 install_func+0x488 %psr = 0xfe401001 impl=0xf ver=0xe icc=nZvc ec=0 ef=4096 pil=0 s=0 ps=0 et=0 cwp=0x1 %y = 0x00000000 %pc = 0x000204cc create_zfs_zonepath+0xd8 %npc = 0x000204d0 create_zfs_zonepath+0xdc...

Folks, I'm at the point in developing llvmc (Compiler Driver) where I need to get the details on the specific optimization arguments that the -O family of options should (by default) issue to "opt". I'm soliciting your feedback on this so I can start testing optimization. Hopefully you can provide it by early this coming week. For clarity, the -O options are currently defined

...7ixnu/dianbawga52q3akw+xhe4nx4pkim7ju' not recognized. >>>> eVYaBV+FN0DPgQI1lvairD+mI5gdD9+rPOhJFjugCyt6cXrhYlUI3L5vVP6jgc4lOG3qzsnb **** Command 'evyabv+fn0dpgqi1lvaird+mi5gdd9+rpohjfjugcyt6cxrhylui3l5vvp6jgc4log3qzsnb' not recognized. >>>> 956SQQiq1vPVJHareCvkyRo7TnsR8/VrM+/5aG0TUQAM0/UdZWnJBKIRZ9gz4Zb9+qoz1P+F **** Command '956sqqiq1vpvjharecvkyro7tnsr8/vrm+/5ag0tuqam0/udzwnjbkirz9gz4zb9+qoz1p+f' not recognized. >>>> 9O4aP4+Rqf2+nKKTpgFkzCsEBs3zCa4wluoyU644+DJgAkfn5+dR1axG99lL35kPDF9qhfH2 **** Command '9o4ap4+rqf2+nkktpgfkzcsebs3zca4...