Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "nynaev".
Did you mean:
nynaeve
2003 Apr 15
8
repost (passive FTP server in DMZ and shorewall 1.4.2)
I apologize for the first message. :)
---------------------------------------
I have an FTP server running in the DMZ section of my home network. It uses port 23000 for connection and ports 19990 to 19994 for data transfer.
I have setup the following rule for outside people to connect to it:
DNAT net dmz:192.168.2.2 tcp 23000
I''m at work right now and I can''t use
2011 Dec 04
3
[LLVMdev] Implement implicit TLS on Windows - need advice
...ould be generated for the
tls1.ll test case:
(1) mov rdx, qword [gs:abs 58H]
(2) mov ecx, dword [rel _tls_index]
mov rcx, qword [rdx+rcx*8]
(3) mov eax, .tls$:i
(4) mov eax, dword [rax+rcx]
ret
(See the PECOFF spec, chapter 5.7 and http://www.nynaeve.net/?p=185 for
reference.)
I tried to implement this. With the attached patch tls1.patch, a thread
local variable ends up in the .tls section. This looks fine.
With the second patch tls2.patch I try to implement the code sequence.
Here I have a couple of questions:
- To get the offset to star...
2012 Aug 04
1
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] GCC 4.7.2 will have Win64 SEH (by default)
+LLVMdev
On Aug 4, 2012, at 9:45 AM, João Matos wrote:
> Charles Davis did a lot of work on Win64 SEH support in LLVM, check commits r131652-r132880.
>
> As I haven't tested it yet, what exactly is broken?
It's not finished yet. All the stuff for assembly code that uses Win64 EH is done, but not the code-gen-side stuff (cf. Win64Exception class in CodeGen). I was about to
2011 Dec 06
0
[LLVMdev] Implement implicit TLS on Windows - need advice
...case:
>
> (1) mov rdx, qword [gs:abs 58H]
> (2) mov ecx, dword [rel _tls_index]
> mov rcx, qword [rdx+rcx*8]
> (3) mov eax, .tls$:i
> (4) mov eax, dword [rax+rcx]
> ret
>
> (See the PECOFF spec, chapter 5.7 and http://www.nynaeve.net/?p=185 for
> reference.)
>
> I tried to implement this. With the attached patch tls1.patch, a thread
> local variable ends up in the .tls section. This looks fine.
> With the second patch tls2.patch I try to implement the code sequence. Here
> I have a couple of questions:
&g...