Displaying 14 results from an estimated 14 matches for "nvptxisellowering".
2012 Jun 29
2
[LLVMdev] [NVPTX] Backend failure in LegalizeDAG due to unimplemented expand in target lowering
...me to utilize bugpoint to reduce the
> previously submitted test case. For record, it code be done with the
> following command:
>
> $ bugpoint -llc-safe test.ll
>
> The resulting IR is attached, and it is crashing in the same way. Is
> it a valid code?
Looks like a bug in the NVPTXISelLowering.cpp: it has
"setOperationAction(ISD::STORE, MVT::i1, Expand);", but the legalizer
doesn't know how to handle that.
-Eli
2012 Jun 30
2
[LLVMdev] [NVPTX] Backend failure in LegalizeDAG due to unimplemented expand in target lowering
...st case. For record, it code be done with the
>>> following command:
>>>
>>> $ bugpoint -llc-safe test.ll
>>>
>>> The resulting IR is attached, and it is crashing in the same way. Is
>>> it a valid code?
>>
>> Looks like a bug in the NVPTXISelLowering.cpp: it has
>> "setOperationAction(ISD::STORE, MVT::i1, Expand);", but the legalizer
>> doesn't know how to handle that.
>>
>> -Eli
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http:/...
2012 Jun 30
0
[LLVMdev] [NVPTX] Backend failure in LegalizeDAG due to unimplemented expand in target lowering
...>> previously submitted test case. For record, it code be done with the
>> following command:
>>
>> $ bugpoint -llc-safe test.ll
>>
>> The resulting IR is attached, and it is crashing in the same way. Is
>> it a valid code?
>
> Looks like a bug in the NVPTXISelLowering.cpp: it has
> "setOperationAction(ISD::STORE, MVT::i1, Expand);", but the legalizer
> doesn't know how to handle that.
>
> -Eli
2019 Jul 12
2
Introducing an Alignment object in LLVM
...patch worthwhile?
- If so, how should it be reviewed? Should it be split?
-- Guillaume
PS: If you intend to have a look at it you should start with
`llvm/include/llvm/Support/Alignment.h`
1 -
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/b725d27350ffdda9e8e9144668ad54c922297f59/llvm/lib/Target/NVPTX/NVPTXISelLowering.cpp#L2593
2 -
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/b725d27350ffdda9e8e9144668ad54c922297f59/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SafeStack.cpp#L545
3 -
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/b725d27350ffdda9e8e9144668ad54c922297f59/llvm/lib/Target/Hexagon/HexagonFrameLowering.cpp#L1533
4 -
https://github.com/l...
2012 Jun 30
2
[LLVMdev] [NVPTX] Backend failure in LegalizeDAG due to unimplemented expand in target lowering
...t; following command:
>>>>>
>>>>> $ bugpoint -llc-safe test.ll
>>>>>
>>>>> The resulting IR is attached, and it is crashing in the same way. Is
>>>>> it a valid code?
>>>>
>>>> Looks like a bug in the NVPTXISelLowering.cpp: it has
>>>> "setOperationAction(ISD::STORE, MVT::i1, Expand);", but the legalizer
>>>> doesn't know how to handle that.
>>>>
>>>> -Eli
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> LLVM Developers mailing...
2012 Jun 30
0
[LLVMdev] [NVPTX] Backend failure in LegalizeDAG due to unimplemented expand in target lowering
...done with the
>>>> following command:
>>>>
>>>> $ bugpoint -llc-safe test.ll
>>>>
>>>> The resulting IR is attached, and it is crashing in the same way. Is
>>>> it a valid code?
>>>
>>> Looks like a bug in the NVPTXISelLowering.cpp: it has
>>> "setOperationAction(ISD::STORE, MVT::i1, Expand);", but the legalizer
>>> doesn't know how to handle that.
>>>
>>> -Eli
>> _______________________________________________
>> LLVM Developers mailing list
>> LLVMdev a...
2012 Jul 02
4
[LLVMdev] [NVPTX] Backend failure in LegalizeDAG due to unimplemented expand in target lowering
...int -llc-safe test.ll
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> The resulting IR is attached, and it is crashing in the same way. Is
> >>>>>> it a valid code?
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Looks like a bug in the NVPTXISelLowering.cpp: it has
> >>>>> "setOperationAction(ISD::STORE, MVT::i1, Expand);", but the legalizer
> >>>>> doesn't know how to handle that.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> -Eli
> >>>>
> >>>> _________________...
2012 Jul 01
0
[LLVMdev] [NVPTX] Backend failure in LegalizeDAG due to unimplemented expand in target lowering
...t;>>>>> $ bugpoint -llc-safe test.ll
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The resulting IR is attached, and it is crashing in the same way. Is
>>>>>> it a valid code?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Looks like a bug in the NVPTXISelLowering.cpp: it has
>>>>> "setOperationAction(ISD::STORE, MVT::i1, Expand);", but the legalizer
>>>>> doesn't know how to handle that.
>>>>>
>>>>> -Eli
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________...
2019 Jul 12
2
Introducing an Alignment object in LLVM
...hould it be reviewed? Should it be split?
>
> -- Guillaume
> PS: If you intend to have a look at it you should start with
> `llvm/include/llvm/Support/Alignment.h`
>
> 1 -
> https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/b725d27350ffdda9e8e9144668ad54c922297f59/llvm/lib/Target/NVPTX/NVPTXISelLowering.cpp#L2593
> 2 -
> https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/b725d27350ffdda9e8e9144668ad54c922297f59/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SafeStack.cpp#L545
> 3 -
> https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/b725d27350ffdda9e8e9144668ad54c922297f59/llvm/lib/Target/Hexagon/HexagonFrameLowering.cpp#L1533
>...
2012 Jul 03
0
[LLVMdev] [NVPTX] Backend failure in LegalizeDAG due to unimplemented expand in target lowering
...t;>>>>> $ bugpoint -llc-safe test.ll
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The resulting IR is attached, and it is crashing in the same way. Is
>>>>>> it a valid code?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Looks like a bug in the NVPTXISelLowering.cpp: it has
>>>>> "setOperationAction(ISD::STORE, MVT::i1, Expand);", but the legalizer
>>>>> doesn't know how to handle that.
>>>>>
>>>>> -Eli
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________...
2012 Jul 08
1
[LLVMdev] [NVPTX] Backend failure in LegalizeDAG due to unimplemented expand in target lowering
...bugpoint -llc-safe test.ll
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The resulting IR is attached, and it is crashing in the same way. Is
>>>>>>> it a valid code?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Looks like a bug in the NVPTXISelLowering.cpp: it has
>>>>>> "setOperationAction(ISD::STORE, MVT::i1, Expand);", but the legalizer
>>>>>> doesn't know how to handle that.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -Eli
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________...
2016 Apr 29
3
Assert in TargetLoweringBase.cpp
This post is related to the following post
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-April/098823.html
I'm still trying to compile a library with clang. But now I'm getting as
assert in
lib/CodeGen/TargetLoweringBase.cpp:1155: virtual llvm::EVT
llvm::TargetLoweringBase::getSetCCResultType(llvm::LLVMContext&, llvm::EVT)
const: Assertion `!VT.isVector() && "No default
2012 Jun 29
0
[LLVMdev] [NVPTX] Backend failure in LegalizeDAG due to unimplemented expand in target lowering
Hi again,
Kind people on #llvm helped me to utilize bugpoint to reduce the
previously submitted test case. For record, it code be done with the
following command:
$ bugpoint -llc-safe test.ll
The resulting IR is attached, and it is crashing in the same way. Is
it a valid code?
dmikushin at hp2:~/forge/kernelgen/branches/tests_lnt/behavior/sincos>
llc test.ll.1
This action is not supported
2012 Jun 27
2
[LLVMdev] [NVPTX] Backend failure in LegalizeDAG due to unimplemented expand in target lowering
Dear LLVM,
I'm trying to understand why the attached IR code works for x86_64
target and fails for nvptx64, because of unimplemented expand during
the target lowering. Any ideas?
Just change the target triple to x86_64-unknown-unknown, and the same
IR code could we successfully codegen-ed for x86_64.
Thanks,
- Dima.
dmikushin at dmikushin-desktop:~/Desktop$ gdb ~/sandbox/bin/llc
GNU gdb