search for: nvptxisellowering

Displaying 14 results from an estimated 14 matches for "nvptxisellowering".

2012 Jun 29
2
[LLVMdev] [NVPTX] Backend failure in LegalizeDAG due to unimplemented expand in target lowering
...me to utilize bugpoint to reduce the > previously submitted test case. For record, it code be done with the > following command: > > $ bugpoint -llc-safe test.ll > > The resulting IR is attached, and it is crashing in the same way. Is > it a valid code? Looks like a bug in the NVPTXISelLowering.cpp: it has "setOperationAction(ISD::STORE, MVT::i1, Expand);", but the legalizer doesn't know how to handle that. -Eli
2012 Jun 30
2
[LLVMdev] [NVPTX] Backend failure in LegalizeDAG due to unimplemented expand in target lowering
...st case. For record, it code be done with the >>> following command: >>> >>> $ bugpoint -llc-safe test.ll >>> >>> The resulting IR is attached, and it is crashing in the same way. Is >>> it a valid code? >> >> Looks like a bug in the NVPTXISelLowering.cpp: it has >> "setOperationAction(ISD::STORE, MVT::i1, Expand);", but the legalizer >> doesn't know how to handle that. >> >> -Eli > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http:/...
2012 Jun 30
0
[LLVMdev] [NVPTX] Backend failure in LegalizeDAG due to unimplemented expand in target lowering
...>> previously submitted test case. For record, it code be done with the >> following command: >> >> $ bugpoint -llc-safe test.ll >> >> The resulting IR is attached, and it is crashing in the same way. Is >> it a valid code? > > Looks like a bug in the NVPTXISelLowering.cpp: it has > "setOperationAction(ISD::STORE, MVT::i1, Expand);", but the legalizer > doesn't know how to handle that. > > -Eli
2019 Jul 12
2
Introducing an Alignment object in LLVM
...patch worthwhile? - If so, how should it be reviewed? Should it be split? -- Guillaume PS: If you intend to have a look at it you should start with `llvm/include/llvm/Support/Alignment.h` 1 - https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/b725d27350ffdda9e8e9144668ad54c922297f59/llvm/lib/Target/NVPTX/NVPTXISelLowering.cpp#L2593 2 - https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/b725d27350ffdda9e8e9144668ad54c922297f59/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SafeStack.cpp#L545 3 - https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/b725d27350ffdda9e8e9144668ad54c922297f59/llvm/lib/Target/Hexagon/HexagonFrameLowering.cpp#L1533 4 - https://github.com/l...
2012 Jun 30
2
[LLVMdev] [NVPTX] Backend failure in LegalizeDAG due to unimplemented expand in target lowering
...t; following command: >>>>> >>>>> $ bugpoint -llc-safe test.ll >>>>> >>>>> The resulting IR is attached, and it is crashing in the same way. Is >>>>> it a valid code? >>>> >>>> Looks like a bug in the NVPTXISelLowering.cpp: it has >>>> "setOperationAction(ISD::STORE, MVT::i1, Expand);", but the legalizer >>>> doesn't know how to handle that. >>>> >>>> -Eli >>> _______________________________________________ >>> LLVM Developers mailing...
2012 Jun 30
0
[LLVMdev] [NVPTX] Backend failure in LegalizeDAG due to unimplemented expand in target lowering
...done with the >>>> following command: >>>> >>>> $ bugpoint -llc-safe test.ll >>>> >>>> The resulting IR is attached, and it is crashing in the same way. Is >>>> it a valid code? >>> >>> Looks like a bug in the NVPTXISelLowering.cpp: it has >>> "setOperationAction(ISD::STORE, MVT::i1, Expand);", but the legalizer >>> doesn't know how to handle that. >>> >>> -Eli >> _______________________________________________ >> LLVM Developers mailing list >> LLVMdev a...
2012 Jul 02
4
[LLVMdev] [NVPTX] Backend failure in LegalizeDAG due to unimplemented expand in target lowering
...int -llc-safe test.ll > >>>>>> > >>>>>> The resulting IR is attached, and it is crashing in the same way. Is > >>>>>> it a valid code? > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> Looks like a bug in the NVPTXISelLowering.cpp: it has > >>>>> "setOperationAction(ISD::STORE, MVT::i1, Expand);", but the legalizer > >>>>> doesn't know how to handle that. > >>>>> > >>>>> -Eli > >>>> > >>>> _________________...
2012 Jul 01
0
[LLVMdev] [NVPTX] Backend failure in LegalizeDAG due to unimplemented expand in target lowering
...t;>>>>> $ bugpoint -llc-safe test.ll >>>>>> >>>>>> The resulting IR is attached, and it is crashing in the same way. Is >>>>>> it a valid code? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Looks like a bug in the NVPTXISelLowering.cpp: it has >>>>> "setOperationAction(ISD::STORE, MVT::i1, Expand);", but the legalizer >>>>> doesn't know how to handle that. >>>>> >>>>> -Eli >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________...
2019 Jul 12
2
Introducing an Alignment object in LLVM
...hould it be reviewed? Should it be split? > > -- Guillaume > PS: If you intend to have a look at it you should start with > `llvm/include/llvm/Support/Alignment.h` > > 1 - > https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/b725d27350ffdda9e8e9144668ad54c922297f59/llvm/lib/Target/NVPTX/NVPTXISelLowering.cpp#L2593 > 2 - > https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/b725d27350ffdda9e8e9144668ad54c922297f59/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SafeStack.cpp#L545 > 3 - > https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/b725d27350ffdda9e8e9144668ad54c922297f59/llvm/lib/Target/Hexagon/HexagonFrameLowering.cpp#L1533 >...
2012 Jul 03
0
[LLVMdev] [NVPTX] Backend failure in LegalizeDAG due to unimplemented expand in target lowering
...t;>>>>> $ bugpoint -llc-safe test.ll >>>>>> >>>>>> The resulting IR is attached, and it is crashing in the same way. Is >>>>>> it a valid code? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Looks like a bug in the NVPTXISelLowering.cpp: it has >>>>> "setOperationAction(ISD::STORE, MVT::i1, Expand);", but the legalizer >>>>> doesn't know how to handle that. >>>>> >>>>> -Eli >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________...
2012 Jul 08
1
[LLVMdev] [NVPTX] Backend failure in LegalizeDAG due to unimplemented expand in target lowering
...bugpoint -llc-safe test.ll >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The resulting IR is attached, and it is crashing in the same way. Is >>>>>>> it a valid code? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Looks like a bug in the NVPTXISelLowering.cpp: it has >>>>>> "setOperationAction(ISD::STORE, MVT::i1, Expand);", but the legalizer >>>>>> doesn't know how to handle that. >>>>>> >>>>>> -Eli >>>>> >>>>> _______________________...
2016 Apr 29
3
Assert in TargetLoweringBase.cpp
This post is related to the following post http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-April/098823.html I'm still trying to compile a library with clang. But now I'm getting as assert in lib/CodeGen/TargetLoweringBase.cpp:1155: virtual llvm::EVT llvm::TargetLoweringBase::getSetCCResultType(llvm::LLVMContext&, llvm::EVT) const: Assertion `!VT.isVector() && "No default
2012 Jun 29
0
[LLVMdev] [NVPTX] Backend failure in LegalizeDAG due to unimplemented expand in target lowering
Hi again, Kind people on #llvm helped me to utilize bugpoint to reduce the previously submitted test case. For record, it code be done with the following command: $ bugpoint -llc-safe test.ll The resulting IR is attached, and it is crashing in the same way. Is it a valid code? dmikushin at hp2:~/forge/kernelgen/branches/tests_lnt/behavior/sincos> llc test.ll.1 This action is not supported
2012 Jun 27
2
[LLVMdev] [NVPTX] Backend failure in LegalizeDAG due to unimplemented expand in target lowering
Dear LLVM, I'm trying to understand why the attached IR code works for x86_64 target and fails for nvptx64, because of unimplemented expand during the target lowering. Any ideas? Just change the target triple to x86_64-unknown-unknown, and the same IR code could we successfully codegen-ed for x86_64. Thanks, - Dima. dmikushin at dmikushin-desktop:~/Desktop$ gdb ~/sandbox/bin/llc GNU gdb