Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "nvmet_subsi".
Did you mean:
nvmet_subsys
2015 Nov 20
0
[RFC PATCH 4/9] nvmet: add a controller "start" hook
From: Ming Lin <ming.l at ssi.samsung.com>
This is used to execute controller specific start code
Signed-off-by: Ming Lin <ming.l at ssi.samsung.com>
---
drivers/nvme/target/core.c | 3 +++
drivers/nvme/target/nvmet.h | 3 +++
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/nvme/target/core.c b/drivers/nvme/target/core.c
index 1bfef66..0a0fc48 100644
---
2015 Nov 20
1
[RFC PATCH 4/9] nvmet: add a controller "start" hook
On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 04:21:03PM -0800, Ming Lin wrote:
> #define NVMET_SUBSYS_NAME_LEN 256
> char subsys_name[NVMET_SUBSYS_NAME_LEN];
> +
> + void *opaque;
> + void (*start)(void *);
> };
Why can't vhost use container_of to get at the containing structure
similar to what the loop driver does?
In addition I think we'll eventually need an ops structure here,
2015 Nov 20
15
[RFC PATCH 0/9] vhost-nvme: new qemu nvme backend using nvme target
Hi,
This is the first attempt to add a new qemu nvme backend using
in-kernel nvme target.
Most code are ported from qemu-nvme and also borrow code from
Hannes Reinecke's rts-megasas.
It's similar as vhost-scsi, but doesn't use virtio.
The advantage is guest can run unmodified NVMe driver.
So guest can be any OS that has a NVMe driver.
The goal is to get as good performance as
2015 Nov 20
15
[RFC PATCH 0/9] vhost-nvme: new qemu nvme backend using nvme target
Hi,
This is the first attempt to add a new qemu nvme backend using
in-kernel nvme target.
Most code are ported from qemu-nvme and also borrow code from
Hannes Reinecke's rts-megasas.
It's similar as vhost-scsi, but doesn't use virtio.
The advantage is guest can run unmodified NVMe driver.
So guest can be any OS that has a NVMe driver.
The goal is to get as good performance as