search for: nvkm_secboot_falcon_fecs

...t; wrote: [snip] > +static const char * > +managed_falcons_names[] = { > + [NVKM_SECBOOT_FALCON_PMU] = "PMU", > + [NVKM_SECBOOT_FALCON_RESERVED] = "<invalid>", "<reserved>" perhaps ? we already have one invalid below. > + [NVKM_SECBOOT_FALCON_FECS] = "FECS", > + [NVKM_SECBOOT_FALCON_GPCCS] = "GPCCS", > + [NVKM_SECBOOT_FALCON_END] = "<invalid>", > +}; > + [snip] > +int > +nvkm_secboot_ctor(const struct nvkm_secboot_func *func, > + struct nvkm_device *device,...

This series fixes two cases where behavior on secure boot errors could be improved: 1) Patch 2 propages secure-boot errors from GR init, making sure initialization fails as it should. Failure to do so results in a black screen during boot, as reported in FD bug 94990. 2) Patches 3-4 make the absence of required secure firmware files a non-fatal error. The previous behavior was to give up

This was the first step of the secure boot refactoring - as Ben asked for some fixes, I now submit it as its own series to make it easier to review (and also because rebasing secure boot on top of this takes time and I don't want to do it until this is validated!). This series attempts to factorize the duplicate falcon-related code into a single library, using the existing nvkm_falcon

...a428 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/secboot/gm20b.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/secboot/gm20b.c @@ -108,6 +108,7 @@ gm20b_secboot_new(struct nvkm_device *device, int index, struct gm200_secboot *gsb; struct nvkm_acr *acr; + *psb = NULL; acr = acr_r352_new(BIT(NVKM_SECBOOT_FALCON_FECS) | BIT(NVKM_SECBOOT_FALCON_PMU)); if (IS_ERR(acr)) @@ -116,10 +117,8 @@ gm20b_secboot_new(struct nvkm_device *device, int index, acr->optional_falcons = BIT(NVKM_SECBOOT_FALCON_PMU); gsb = kzalloc(sizeof(*gsb), GFP_KERNEL); - if (!gsb) { - psb = NULL; + if (!gsb) return -ENOME...

This was the first step of the secure boot refactoring - as Ben asked for some fixes, I now submit it as its own series to make it easier to review (and also because rebasing secure boot on top of this takes time and I don't want to do it until this is validated!). This series attempts to factorize the duplicate falcon-related code into a single library, using the existing nvkm_falcon

Sending things in a smaller chunks since it makes their reviewing easier. This part part 2/3 of the secboot refactoring/PMU command support patch series. Part 1 was the new falcon library which should be merged soon now. This series is mainly a refactoring/sanitization of the existing secure boot code. It does not add new features (part 3 will). Secure boot handling is now separated by NVIDIA

New version of the secure boot code that works with the blobs just merged into linux-firmware. Since the required Mesa patches are also merged, this set is the last piece of the puzzle to get out-of-the-box accelerated Maxwell 2. The basic code remains the same, with a few improvements with respect to how secure falcons are started. Hopefully the patchset is better split too. I have a

This is a highly changed revision of the first patch series that adds secure boot support to Nouveau. This code still depends on NVIDIA releasing official firmware files, but the files released with SHIELD TV and Pixel C can already be used on a Jetson TX1. As you know we are working hard to release the official firmware files, however in the meantime it doesn't hurt to review the code so it

...OM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER + * DEALINGS IN THE SOFTWARE. + */ + +#ifndef __NVKM_SECURE_BOOT_H__ +#define __NVKM_SECURE_BOOT_H__ + +#include <core/subdev.h> + +enum nvkm_secboot_falcon { + NVKM_SECBOOT_FALCON_PMU = 0, + NVKM_SECBOOT_FALCON_RESERVED = 1, + NVKM_SECBOOT_FALCON_FECS = 2, + NVKM_SECBOOT_FALCON_GPCCS = 3, + NVKM_SECBOOT_FALCON_END = 4, + NVKM_SECBOOT_FALCON_INVALID = 0xffffffff, +}; + +/** + * @falcon_id: falcon that will perform secure boot + * @base: base IO address of the falcon performing secure boot + * @irq_mask: IRQ mask of the falcon performing secure...

...bl: + nvkm_firmware_put(bl); +error: + return ret; +} + +typedef int (*lsf_load_func)(struct nvkm_subdev *, struct ls_ucode_img *); + +static int +ls_ucode_img_load_fecs(struct nvkm_subdev *subdev, struct ls_ucode_img *img) +{ + return ls_ucode_img_load_generic(subdev, img, "fecs", + NVKM_SECBOOT_FALCON_FECS); +} + +static int +ls_ucode_img_load_gpccs(struct nvkm_subdev *subdev, struct ls_ucode_img *img) +{ + return ls_ucode_img_load_generic(subdev, img, "gpccs", + NVKM_SECBOOT_FALCON_GPCCS); +} + +/** + * ls_ucode_img_load() - create a lsf_ucode_img and load it + */ +static struct ls_uc...

...ALCON_PMU] = "PMU", >> + [NVKM_SECBOOT_FALCON_RESERVED] = "<invalid>", > "<reserved>" perhaps ? we already have one invalid below. Does <reserved> really mean: "we don't want to tell you?" here? :) > >> + [NVKM_SECBOOT_FALCON_FECS] = "FECS", >> + [NVKM_SECBOOT_FALCON_GPCCS] = "GPCCS", >> + [NVKM_SECBOOT_FALCON_END] = "<invalid>", >> +}; >> + > > [snip] >> +int >> +nvkm_secboot_ctor(const struct nvkm_secboot_func *func, >> +...

...20b.c 103 int 104 gm20b_secboot_new(struct nvkm_device *device, int index, 105 struct nvkm_secboot **psb) 106 { 107 int ret; 108 struct gm200_secboot *gsb; 109 struct nvkm_acr *acr; 110 111 acr = acr_r352_new(BIT(NVKM_SECBOOT_FALCON_FECS) | 112 BIT(NVKM_SECBOOT_FALCON_PMU)); 113 if (IS_ERR(acr)) 114 return PTR_ERR(acr); 115 /* Support the initial GM20B firmware release without PMU */ 116 acr->optional_falcons = BIT(NVKM_SECBOOT_FALCON_PMU);...

...4280 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/secboot/gm20b.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/secboot/gm20b.c @@ -108,6 +108,7 @@ gm20b_secboot_new(struct nvkm_device *device, int index, struct gm200_secboot *gsb; struct nvkm_acr *acr; + *psb = NULL; acr = acr_r352_new(BIT(NVKM_SECBOOT_FALCON_FECS) | BIT(NVKM_SECBOOT_FALCON_PMU)); if (IS_ERR(acr)) @@ -116,10 +117,8 @@ gm20b_secboot_new(struct nvkm_device *device, int index, acr->optional_falcons = BIT(NVKM_SECBOOT_FALCON_PMU); gsb = kzalloc(sizeof(*gsb), GFP_KERNEL); - if (!gsb) { - psb = NULL; + if (!gsb) return -ENOME...

...4280 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/secboot/gm20b.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/secboot/gm20b.c @@ -108,6 +108,7 @@ gm20b_secboot_new(struct nvkm_device *device, int index, struct gm200_secboot *gsb; struct nvkm_acr *acr; + *psb = NULL; acr = acr_r352_new(BIT(NVKM_SECBOOT_FALCON_FECS) | BIT(NVKM_SECBOOT_FALCON_PMU)); if (IS_ERR(acr)) @@ -116,10 +117,8 @@ gm20b_secboot_new(struct nvkm_device *device, int index, acr->optional_falcons = BIT(NVKM_SECBOOT_FALCON_PMU); gsb = kzalloc(sizeof(*gsb), GFP_KERNEL); - if (!gsb) { - psb = NULL; + if (!gsb) return -ENOME...

...4280 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/secboot/gm20b.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/secboot/gm20b.c @@ -108,6 +108,7 @@ gm20b_secboot_new(struct nvkm_device *device, int index, struct gm200_secboot *gsb; struct nvkm_acr *acr; + *psb = NULL; acr = acr_r352_new(BIT(NVKM_SECBOOT_FALCON_FECS) | BIT(NVKM_SECBOOT_FALCON_PMU)); if (IS_ERR(acr)) @@ -116,10 +117,8 @@ gm20b_secboot_new(struct nvkm_device *device, int index, acr->optional_falcons = BIT(NVKM_SECBOOT_FALCON_PMU); gsb = kzalloc(sizeof(*gsb), GFP_KERNEL); - if (!gsb) { - psb = NULL; + if (!gsb) return -ENOME...

...6c6a 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/secboot/gm20b.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/secboot/gm20b.c @@ -108,6 +108,7 @@ gm20b_secboot_new(struct nvkm_device *device, int index, struct gm200_secboot *gsb; struct nvkm_acr *acr; + *psb = NULL; acr = acr_r352_new(BIT(NVKM_SECBOOT_FALCON_FECS) | BIT(NVKM_SECBOOT_FALCON_PMU)); if (IS_ERR(acr)) @@ -116,10 +117,8 @@ gm20b_secboot_new(struct nvkm_device *device, int index, acr->optional_falcons = BIT(NVKM_SECBOOT_FALCON_PMU); gsb = kzalloc(sizeof(*gsb), GFP_KERNEL); - if (!gsb) { - psb = NULL; + if (!gsb) return -ENOME...

...gt; "<reserved>" perhaps ? we already have one invalid below. > Does <reserved> really mean: "we don't want to tell you?" here? :) > That or we have some secret WIP that we're haven't decided if it'll work out :-) >> >>> + [NVKM_SECBOOT_FALCON_FECS] = "FECS", >>> + [NVKM_SECBOOT_FALCON_GPCCS] = "GPCCS", >>> + [NVKM_SECBOOT_FALCON_END] = "<invalid>", >>> +}; >>> + >> >> [snip] >>> +int >>> +nvkm_secboot_ctor(const struct nvkm_secbo...

Hi everyone, Apologies for the big patchset. This is a rework of the secure boot code that moves the building of the blob into its own set of source files (and own hooks), making the code more flexible and (hopefully) easier to understand as well. This rework is needed to support more signed firmware for existing and new chips. Since the firmwares in question are not available yet I cannot send

GP10B is the chip used in Tegra X2 SoCs. This patchset adds support for its base engines after reworking secboot a bit to accomodate its calling convention better. This patchset has been tested rendering simple off-screen buffers using Mesa and yielded the expected result. Alexandre Courbot (15): secboot: allow to boot multiple falcons secboot: pass instance to LS firmware loaders secboot:

This is a rework of the secure boot code that moves the building of the blob into its own set of source files (and own hooks), making the code more flexible and (hopefully) easier to understand as well. This rework is needed to support more signed firmware for existing and new chips. Since the firmwares in question are not available yet I cannot send the code to manage then, but hopefully the