Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "nvkm_memx_fini".
2018 Dec 19
1
[PATCH] drm/nouveau/pmu: don't print reply values if exec is false
...ions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/pmu/memx.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/pmu/memx.c
index 11b28b086a06..7b052879af72 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/pmu/memx.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/pmu/memx.c
@@ -88,10 +88,10 @@ nvkm_memx_fini(struct nvkm_memx **pmemx, bool exec)
if (exec) {
nvkm_pmu_send(pmu, reply, PROC_MEMX, MEMX_MSG_EXEC,
memx->base, finish);
+ nvkm_debug(subdev, "Exec took %uns, PMU_IN %08x\n",
+ reply[0], reply[1]);
}
- nvkm_debug(subdev, "Exec took %uns, PMU_IN %08x\n&quo...
2020 Jan 16
0
[PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 203/671] drm/nouveau/pmu: don't print reply values if exec is false
...ions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/pmu/memx.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/pmu/memx.c
index 11b28b086a06..7b052879af72 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/pmu/memx.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/pmu/memx.c
@@ -88,10 +88,10 @@ nvkm_memx_fini(struct nvkm_memx **pmemx, bool exec)
if (exec) {
nvkm_pmu_send(pmu, reply, PROC_MEMX, MEMX_MSG_EXEC,
memx->base, finish);
+ nvkm_debug(subdev, "Exec took %uns, PMU_IN %08x\n",
+ reply[0], reply[1]);
}
- nvkm_debug(subdev, "Exec took %uns, PMU_IN %08x\n&quo...
2020 Jan 16
0
[PATCH AUTOSEL 4.14 112/371] drm/nouveau/pmu: don't print reply values if exec is false
...ions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/pmu/memx.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/pmu/memx.c
index 11b28b086a06..7b052879af72 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/pmu/memx.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/pmu/memx.c
@@ -88,10 +88,10 @@ nvkm_memx_fini(struct nvkm_memx **pmemx, bool exec)
if (exec) {
nvkm_pmu_send(pmu, reply, PROC_MEMX, MEMX_MSG_EXEC,
memx->base, finish);
+ nvkm_debug(subdev, "Exec took %uns, PMU_IN %08x\n",
+ reply[0], reply[1]);
}
- nvkm_debug(subdev, "Exec took %uns, PMU_IN %08x\n&quo...
2020 Jan 16
0
[PATCH AUTOSEL 4.9 081/251] drm/nouveau/pmu: don't print reply values if exec is false
...ions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/pmu/memx.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/pmu/memx.c
index e6f74168238c..2ef9e942f43a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/pmu/memx.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/pmu/memx.c
@@ -87,10 +87,10 @@ nvkm_memx_fini(struct nvkm_memx **pmemx, bool exec)
if (exec) {
nvkm_pmu_send(pmu, reply, PROC_MEMX, MEMX_MSG_EXEC,
memx->base, finish);
+ nvkm_debug(subdev, "Exec took %uns, PMU_IN %08x\n",
+ reply[0], reply[1]);
}
- nvkm_debug(subdev, "Exec took %uns, PMU_IN %08x\n&quo...
2020 Jan 16
0
[PATCH AUTOSEL 4.4 049/174] drm/nouveau/pmu: don't print reply values if exec is false
...ions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/pmu/memx.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/pmu/memx.c
index e6f74168238c..2ef9e942f43a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/pmu/memx.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/pmu/memx.c
@@ -87,10 +87,10 @@ nvkm_memx_fini(struct nvkm_memx **pmemx, bool exec)
if (exec) {
nvkm_pmu_send(pmu, reply, PROC_MEMX, MEMX_MSG_EXEC,
memx->base, finish);
+ nvkm_debug(subdev, "Exec took %uns, PMU_IN %08x\n",
+ reply[0], reply[1]);
}
- nvkm_debug(subdev, "Exec took %uns, PMU_IN %08x\n&quo...
2017 Jan 23
8
[Bug 99505] New: Attempting to reclock GeForce GT740M (GK208) cause GPU and system to hang
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99505
Bug ID: 99505
Summary: Attempting to reclock GeForce GT740M (GK208) cause GPU
and system to hang
Product: xorg
Version: unspecified
Hardware: Other
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: medium
Component: