search for: nvkm_mc_intr_mask

...> +#include <subdev/mc.h> /** * gm200_secboot_setup_falcon() - set up the secure falcon for secure boot @@ -99,6 +100,9 @@ gm200_secboot_run_blob(struct nvkm_secboot *sb, struct nvkm_gpuobj *blob) if (ret) goto done; + /* Disable interrupts as we will poll for the HALT bit */ + nvkm_mc_intr_mask(sb->subdev.device, sb->devidx, false); + /* Start the HS bootloader */ ret = nvkm_secboot_falcon_run(sb); if (ret) -- 2.10.0

This was the first step of the secure boot refactoring - as Ben asked for some fixes, I now submit it as its own series to make it easier to review (and also because rebasing secure boot on top of this takes time and I don't want to do it until this is validated!). This series attempts to factorize the duplicate falcon-related code into a single library, using the existing nvkm_falcon

This was the first step of the secure boot refactoring - as Ben asked for some fixes, I now submit it as its own series to make it easier to review (and also because rebasing secure boot on top of this takes time and I don't want to do it until this is validated!). This series attempts to factorize the duplicate falcon-related code into a single library, using the existing nvkm_falcon

GP10B is the chip used in Tegra X2 SoCs. This patchset adds support for its base engines after reworking secboot a bit to accomodate its calling convention better. This patchset has been tested rendering simple off-screen buffers using Mesa and yielded the expected result. Alexandre Courbot (15): secboot: allow to boot multiple falcons secboot: pass instance to LS firmware loaders secboot:

This is an initial series of patches to improve channel recovery on Turing GPUs with the goal of improving reliability enough to eventually enable SVM for Turing. It's likely follow up patches will be required to fully address problems with less trivial workloads than what I have been able to test thus far. This series primarily addresses a number of hardware changes to interrupt layout and

From: Thierry Reding <treding at nvidia.com> Hi Ben, here's a revised subset of the patches I had sent out a couple of weeks ago. I've reworked the BAR2 accesses in the way that you had suggested, which at least for GP10B turned out to be fairly trivial to do. I have not looked in detail at this for GV11B yet, but a cursory look showed that BAR2 is accessed in more places, so the

From: Thierry Reding <treding at nvidia.com> Hi Ben, here's a revised subset of the patches I had sent out a couple of weeks ago. I've reworked the BAR2 accesses in the way that you had suggested, which at least for GP10B turned out to be fairly trivial to do. I have not looked in detail at this for GV11B yet, but a cursory look showed that BAR2 is accessed in more places, so the

Sending things in a smaller chunks since it makes their reviewing easier. This part part 2/3 of the secboot refactoring/PMU command support patch series. Part 1 was the new falcon library which should be merged soon now. This series is mainly a refactoring/sanitization of the existing secure boot code. It does not add new features (part 3 will). Secure boot handling is now separated by NVIDIA

This revision includes initial signed PMU firmware support for GM20B (Tegra X1). This PMU code will also be used as a basis for dGPU signed PMU firmware support. With the PMU code, the refactoring of secure boot should also make more sense. ACR (secure boot) support is now separated by the driver version it originates from. This separation allows to run any version of the ACR on any chip,

This is a rework of the secure boot code that moves the building of the blob into its own set of source files (and own hooks), making the code more flexible and (hopefully) easier to understand as well. This rework is needed to support more signed firmware for existing and new chips. Since the firmwares in question are not available yet I cannot send the code to manage then, but hopefully the

This is a rework of the secure boot code that moves the building of the blob into its own set of source files (and own hooks), making the code more flexible and (hopefully) easier to understand as well. This rework is needed to support more signed firmware for existing and new chips. Since the firmwares in question are not available yet I cannot send the code to manage then, but hopefully the