Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "nvkm_fifo_chan_func".
2019 Nov 08
1
[PATCH] RFC: drm/nouveau: Make BAR1 support optional
...nvkm_object *object)
return data;
}
+static void *
+nvkm_fifo_chan_dtor(struct nvkm_object *object)
+{
+ struct nvkm_fifo_chan *chan = nvkm_fifo_chan(object);
+
+ if (chan->user)
+ iounmap(chan->user);
+
+ return __nvkm_fifo_chan_dtor(object);
+}
+
static const struct nvkm_object_func
nvkm_fifo_chan_func = {
.dtor = nvkm_fifo_chan_dtor,
@@ -349,12 +357,98 @@ nvkm_fifo_chan_func = {
.sclass = nvkm_fifo_chan_child_get,
};
+static void *
+nvkm_fifo_chan_mem_dtor(struct nvkm_object *object)
+{
+ return __nvkm_fifo_chan_dtor(object);
+}
+
+static int
+nvkm_fifo_chan_mem_map(struct nvkm_object *ob...
2019 Sep 16
9
[PATCH 0/6] drm/nouveau: Preparatory work for GV11B support
From: Thierry Reding <treding at nvidia.com>
Hi Ben,
these are a couple of patches that are in preparation for adding GV11B
support. The fundamental issue that these are trying to solve is that
the GV11B is the first Tegra incarnation of the GPU where the aperture
really matters. All prior generations would accept any of them.
For dGPUs we usually allocate memory in VRAM, so the default