search for: nvkm_fifo_cgrp

Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "nvkm_fifo_cgrp".

2019 Oct 08
0
[PATCH 3/5] drm/nouveau/fifo/gv100: make gv100_fifo_runlist static
.../drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/fifo/gv100.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/fifo/gv100.c index 6ee1bb32a071..1f6ddf880179 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/fifo/gv100.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/fifo/gv100.c @@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ gv100_fifo_runlist_cgrp(struct nvkm_fifo_cgrp *cgrp, nvkm_wo32(memory, offset + 0xc, 0x00000000); } -const struct gk104_fifo_runlist_func +static const struct gk104_fifo_runlist_func gv100_fifo_runlist = { .size = 16, .cgrp = gv100_fifo_runlist_cgrp, -- 2.23.0
2019 Oct 08
4
[PATCH 1/5] drm/nouveau/gr/gf100-: make undeclared symbols static
The following functions are not declared outside of the file they are in, so make them static to avoid these warnings: drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/gr/gf100.c:745:1: warning: symbol 'gf100_gr_fecs_start_ctxsw' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/gr/gf100.c:760:1: warning: symbol 'gf100_gr_fecs_stop_ctxsw' was not declared. Should it be
2020 Oct 30
6
[PATCH 0/5] Improve Robust Channel (RC) recovery for Turing
This is an initial series of patches to improve channel recovery on Turing GPUs with the goal of improving reliability enough to eventually enable SVM for Turing. It's likely follow up patches will be required to fully address problems with less trivial workloads than what I have been able to test thus far. This series primarily addresses a number of hardware changes to interrupt layout and