search for: nvk

Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "nvk".

Did you mean: nvkm
2007 Nov 09
2
[LLVMdev] Register allocation balancing issues
...eference to the PLDI paper: Balancing Register Allocation Across Threads for a Multithreaded Network Processor Xiaotong Zhuang and Santosh Pande PLDI'04 Another take (and quite not a longshot although probably Fernando -- thanks for the debugger, will try it -- has worked either alone or with NVK on the ILP formulation) is to write-up constraints for an ILP (integer linear programming) solution. I wouldn't mind to wait forever (for several minutes that is ^_^) for a valid register allocation to complete. My application programs range between 50 (the smallest) to about 2K instructions. B...
2007 Nov 09
0
[LLVMdev] Register allocation balancing issues
> > Another take (and quite not a longshot although probably Fernando -- thanks for > the debugger, will try it -- has worked either alone or with NVK on the ILP > formulation) is to write-up constraints for an ILP (integer linear programming) > solution. I wouldn't mind to wait forever (for several minutes that is ^_^) for > a valid register allocation to complete. My application programs range between > 50 (the smallest) to abou...
2007 Nov 08
0
[LLVMdev] Two labels around one instruction in Codegen
That would complicate instruction selection. Not worth it. Evan On Nov 8, 2007, at 1:10 AM, Duncan Sands wrote: >> Ok, so it turns out the labels do not have to be just before / after >> the divide. So we don't have to use the MVT::Flag hackery. However, >> the second label must be after the divide. I think the solution is to >> add a trapping version of DIV (and
2007 Nov 08
2
[LLVMdev] Two labels around one instruction in Codegen
> Ok, so it turns out the labels do not have to be just before / after > the divide. So we don't have to use the MVT::Flag hackery. However, > the second label must be after the divide. I think the solution is to > add a trapping version of DIV (and others) and the second label can > use its chain value as operand. How about a new "trapping" SDNode, which you
2023 Jul 25
1
[PATCH drm-misc-next v8 03/12] drm/nouveau: new VM_BIND uapi interfaces
...lar, it needs to > wait on all the waits as well as the previous EXECs on that channel and > then signal the sigs. I know Dave has a patch for this and it's working > quite well in my testing. > > Other than that, everything looks good.? I'm still re-reading all the > NVK patches but they've been working quite well in my testing this week > apart from a perf issue I need to dig into. I'll give a real RB once > we're sure we all agree on the semantics of _count. > > ~Faith > > +? ? ? ?/** > +? ? ? ? * @wait_count: the numb...
2003 Aug 02
0
Re: how l (PR#3614)
...t;/li> <li><strong><font face=3D"Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size=3D= "2">W<buckhorn>atch Wrinkl<curvaceous>es Disap<copeland>pear</font></strong></li> </ul> xwidhlv ytbvvmyxyftfxc gtxh c tqdawuv e y nvk igl r hvdtr vdvur ilgndutam simmer <p><big><font color=3D"#000080"><strong><b>Do </b><alligator><b>This Al= </b><awake><b>l Wi</b><confectionery><b>th:</strong> </font></big> <ul>...