Displaying 19 results from an estimated 19 matches for "nvif_class_mem_nv50".
2019 Feb 15
1
[PATCH] drm/nouveau/bo: mark expected switch fall-through
...gt; This patch fixes the following warning:
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c: In function ‘nouveau_ttm_io_mem_reserve’:
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c:1434:53: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
> if (drm->client.mem->oclass < NVIF_CLASS_MEM_NV50 || !mem->kind)
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c:1438:2: note: here
> case TTM_PL_VRAM:
> ^~~~
>
> Warning level 3 was used: -Wimplicit-fallthrough=3
>
> Notice that, in this particular case,...
2020 Aug 21
0
[PATCH 2/3] drm/nouveau: move io_reserve_lru handling into the driver v4
...ata);
}
+static void
+nouveau_ttm_io_mem_free_locked(struct nouveau_drm *drm,
+ struct ttm_resource *reg)
+{
+ struct nouveau_mem *mem = nouveau_mem(reg);
+
+ if (!reg->bus.base && !reg->bus.offset)
+ return; /* already freed */
+
+ if (drm->client.mem->oclass >= NVIF_CLASS_MEM_NV50) {
+ switch (reg->mem_type) {
+ case TTM_PL_TT:
+ if (mem->kind)
+ nvif_object_unmap_handle(&mem->mem.object);
+ break;
+ case TTM_PL_VRAM:
+ nvif_object_unmap_handle(&mem->mem.object);
+ break;
+ default:
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+ reg->bus.base = 0;
+ reg->bus....
2019 Jan 29
2
[PATCH] drm/nouveau: mark expected switch fall-through
.../gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
index 73eff52036d2..a72be71c45b4 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
@@ -1434,7 +1434,7 @@ nouveau_ttm_io_mem_reserve(struct ttm_bo_device *bdev, struct ttm_mem_reg *reg)
if (drm->client.mem->oclass < NVIF_CLASS_MEM_NV50 || !mem->kind)
/* untiled */
break;
- /* fallthrough, tiled memory */
+ /* fall through - tiled memory */
case TTM_PL_VRAM:
reg->bus.offset = reg->start << PAGE_SHIFT;
reg->bus.base = device->func->resource_addr(device, 1);
--
2.20.1
2020 Aug 21
5
Moving LRU handling into Nouveau v3
Hi guys,
so I got some hardware and tested this and after hammering out tons of typos it now seems to work fine.
Could you give it more testing?
Thanks in advance,
Christian
2020 Jan 24
1
[PATCH 1/2] drm/nouveau: move io_reserve_lru handling into the driver v2
...>
> +static void
> +nouveau_ttm_io_mem_free_locked(struct nouveau_drm *drm, struct ttm_mem_reg *reg)
> +{
> + struct nouveau_mem *mem = nouveau_mem(reg);
> +
> + if (!reg->bus.base)
> + return; /* already freed */
> +
> + if (drm->client.mem->oclass >= NVIF_CLASS_MEM_NV50) {
> + switch (reg->mem_type) {
> + case TTM_PL_TT:
> + if (mem->kind)
> + nvif_object_unmap_handle(&mem->mem.object);
> + break;
> + case TTM_PL_VRAM:
> + nvif_object_unmap_handle(&mem->mem.object);
> + break;
> + default:
> + brea...
2020 Jan 28
1
[PATCH 1/2] drm/nouveau: move io_reserve_lru handling into the driver v2
...+nouveau_ttm_io_mem_free_locked(struct nouveau_drm *drm, struct ttm_mem_reg *reg)
> +{
> + struct nouveau_mem *mem = nouveau_mem(reg);
> +
> + if (!reg->bus.base)
> + return; /* already freed */
> +
> + if (drm->client.mem->oclass >= NVIF_CLASS_MEM_NV50) {
> + switch (reg->mem_type) {
> + case TTM_PL_TT:
> + if (mem->kind)
> + nvif_object_unmap_handle(&mem->mem.object);
> + break;
> + case TTM_PL_VRAM:...
2020 Jan 24
4
TTM/Nouveau cleanups
Hi guys,
I've already send this out in September last year, but only got a response from Daniel.
Could you guys please test this and tell me what you think about it?
Basically I'm trying to remove all driver specific features from TTM which don't need to be inside the framework.
Thanks,
Christian.
2020 Jan 24
0
[PATCH 1/2] drm/nouveau: move io_reserve_lru handling into the driver v2
...ruct file *filp)
filp->private_data);
}
+static void
+nouveau_ttm_io_mem_free_locked(struct nouveau_drm *drm, struct ttm_mem_reg *reg)
+{
+ struct nouveau_mem *mem = nouveau_mem(reg);
+
+ if (!reg->bus.base)
+ return; /* already freed */
+
+ if (drm->client.mem->oclass >= NVIF_CLASS_MEM_NV50) {
+ switch (reg->mem_type) {
+ case TTM_PL_TT:
+ if (mem->kind)
+ nvif_object_unmap_handle(&mem->mem.object);
+ break;
+ case TTM_PL_VRAM:
+ nvif_object_unmap_handle(&mem->mem.object);
+ break;
+ default:
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+ reg->bus.base = 0;
+}
+
static i...
2019 Oct 09
0
[PATCH 1/2] drm/nouveau: move io_reserve_lru handling into the driver
...}
>
> +static void
> +nouveau_ttm_io_mem_free_locked(struct nouveau_drm *drm, struct ttm_mem_reg *reg)
> +{
> + struct nouveau_mem *mem = nouveau_mem(reg);
> +
> + if (!reg->bus.base)
> + return; /* already freed */
> +
> + if (drm->client.mem->oclass >= NVIF_CLASS_MEM_NV50) {
> + switch (reg->mem_type) {
> + case TTM_PL_TT:
> + if (mem->kind)
> + nvif_object_unmap_handle(&mem->mem.object);
> + break;
> + case TTM_PL_VRAM:
> + nvif_object_unmap_handle(&mem->mem.object);
> + break;
> + default:
> + brea...
2019 Sep 30
3
[PATCH 1/2] drm/nouveau: move io_reserve_lru handling into the driver
...ruct file *filp)
filp->private_data);
}
+static void
+nouveau_ttm_io_mem_free_locked(struct nouveau_drm *drm, struct ttm_mem_reg *reg)
+{
+ struct nouveau_mem *mem = nouveau_mem(reg);
+
+ if (!reg->bus.base)
+ return; /* already freed */
+
+ if (drm->client.mem->oclass >= NVIF_CLASS_MEM_NV50) {
+ switch (reg->mem_type) {
+ case TTM_PL_TT:
+ if (mem->kind)
+ nvif_object_unmap_handle(&mem->mem.object);
+ break;
+ case TTM_PL_VRAM:
+ nvif_object_unmap_handle(&mem->mem.object);
+ break;
+ default:
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+ reg->bus.base = 0;
+}
+
static i...
2020 Aug 20
3
Moving LRU handling into Nouveau v2
Hi guys,
I already tried this a few month ago, but since I don't have NVidia hardware its rather hard to test for me (need to get some ordered).
Dave brought up the topic that we should probably try to move the handling into Nouveau once more, so I tried to fix the problem Ben reported and rebased on top of current drm-misc-next.
Dave can you test this? At least in theory the approach
2020 Sep 01
4
[PATCH 1/3] drm/ttm: make sure that we always zero init mem.bus v2
We are trying to remove the io_lru handling and depend
on zero init base, offset and addr here.
v2: init addr as well
Signed-off-by: Christian K?nig <christian.koenig at amd.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c | 9 +++++++++
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
index e3931e515906..772c640a6046 100644
---
2019 Nov 20
2
Move io_reserve_lru handling into the driver
Just a gentle ping on this.
Already got the Acked-by from Daniel, but I need some of the
nouveau guys to test this since I can only compile test it.
Regards,
Christian.
2019 Jan 30
0
[PATCH] drm/nouveau: mark expected switch fall-through
...ex 73eff52036d2..a72be71c45b4 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
> @@ -1434,7 +1434,7 @@ nouveau_ttm_io_mem_reserve(struct ttm_bo_device *bdev, struct ttm_mem_reg *reg)
> if (drm->client.mem->oclass < NVIF_CLASS_MEM_NV50 || !mem->kind)
> /* untiled */
> break;
> - /* fallthrough, tiled memory */
> + /* fall through - tiled memory */
> case TTM_PL_VRAM:
> reg->bus.offset = reg->start <<...
2019 Feb 15
2
[PATCH] drm: Mark expected switch fall-throughs
.../gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
index 73eff52036d2..a72be71c45b4 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
@@ -1434,7 +1434,7 @@ nouveau_ttm_io_mem_reserve(struct ttm_bo_device *bdev, struct ttm_mem_reg *reg)
if (drm->client.mem->oclass < NVIF_CLASS_MEM_NV50 || !mem->kind)
/* untiled */
break;
- /* fallthrough, tiled memory */
+ /* fall through - tiled memory */
case TTM_PL_VRAM:
reg->bus.offset = reg->start << PAGE_SHIFT;
reg->bus.base = device->func->resource_addr(device, 1);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rade...
2019 Feb 15
0
[PATCH] drm: Mark expected switch fall-throughs
...ex 73eff52036d2..a72be71c45b4 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
> @@ -1434,7 +1434,7 @@ nouveau_ttm_io_mem_reserve(struct ttm_bo_device *bdev, struct ttm_mem_reg *reg)
> if (drm->client.mem->oclass < NVIF_CLASS_MEM_NV50 || !mem->kind)
> /* untiled */
> break;
> - /* fallthrough, tiled memory */
> + /* fall through - tiled memory */
> case TTM_PL_VRAM:
> reg->bus.offset = reg->start <<...
2020 Jul 07
3
[PATCH][next] drm/nouveau: Use fallthrough pseudo-keyword
.../gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
index c40f127de3d0..00581e6d183f 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
@@ -1458,7 +1458,7 @@ nouveau_ttm_io_mem_reserve(struct ttm_bo_device *bdev, struct ttm_mem_reg *reg)
if (drm->client.mem->oclass < NVIF_CLASS_MEM_NV50 || !mem->kind)
/* untiled */
break;
- /* fall through - tiled memory */
+ fallthrough; /* tiled memory */
case TTM_PL_VRAM:
reg->bus.offset = reg->start << PAGE_SHIFT;
reg->bus.base = device->func->resource_addr(device, 1);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouv...
2020 Jul 08
0
[PATCH][next] drm/nouveau: Use fallthrough pseudo-keyword
...ex c40f127de3d0..00581e6d183f 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
> @@ -1458,7 +1458,7 @@ nouveau_ttm_io_mem_reserve(struct ttm_bo_device *bdev, struct ttm_mem_reg *reg)
> if (drm->client.mem->oclass < NVIF_CLASS_MEM_NV50 || !mem->kind)
> /* untiled */
> break;
> - /* fall through - tiled memory */
> + fallthrough; /* tiled memory */
> case TTM_PL_VRAM:
> reg->bus.offset = reg->start <...
2020 May 11
10
[RFC] Remove AGP support from Radeon/Nouveau/TTM
Hi guys,
Well let's face it AGP is a total headache to maintain and dead for at least 10+ years.
We have a lot of x86 specific stuff in the architecture independent graphics memory management to get the caching right, abusing the DMA API on multiple occasions, need to distinct between AGP and driver specific page tables etc etc...
So the idea here is to just go ahead and remove the support