search for: nvdev_printk_

Displaying 8 results from an estimated 8 matches for "nvdev_printk_".

2016 Nov 02
0
[PATCH v3 01/15] core: constify nv*_printk macros
...ude/nvkm/core/device.h b/drm/nouveau/include/nvkm/core/device.h index 6bc712f32c8b..d426b86e2712 100644 --- a/drm/nouveau/include/nvkm/core/device.h +++ b/drm/nouveau/include/nvkm/core/device.h @@ -262,7 +262,7 @@ extern const struct nvkm_sclass nvkm_udevice_sclass; /* device logging */ #define nvdev_printk_(d,l,p,f,a...) do { \ - struct nvkm_device *_device = (d); \ + const struct nvkm_device *_device = (d); \ if (_device->debug >= (l)) \ dev_##...
2016 Dec 13
0
[PATCH v2 1/15] core: constify nv*_printk macros
...ude/nvkm/core/device.h b/drm/nouveau/include/nvkm/core/device.h index 6bc712f32c8b..d426b86e2712 100644 --- a/drm/nouveau/include/nvkm/core/device.h +++ b/drm/nouveau/include/nvkm/core/device.h @@ -262,7 +262,7 @@ extern const struct nvkm_sclass nvkm_udevice_sclass; /* device logging */ #define nvdev_printk_(d,l,p,f,a...) do { \ - struct nvkm_device *_device = (d); \ + const struct nvkm_device *_device = (d); \ if (_device->debug >= (l)) \ dev_##...
2016 Dec 06
9
[PATCH 0/8] Falcon library
This was the first step of the secure boot refactoring - as Ben asked for some fixes, I now submit it as its own series to make it easier to review (and also because rebasing secure boot on top of this takes time and I don't want to do it until this is validated!). This series attempts to factorize the duplicate falcon-related code into a single library, using the existing nvkm_falcon
2016 Dec 13
15
[PATCH v2 0/15] Falcon library
This was the first step of the secure boot refactoring - as Ben asked for some fixes, I now submit it as its own series to make it easier to review (and also because rebasing secure boot on top of this takes time and I don't want to do it until this is validated!). This series attempts to factorize the duplicate falcon-related code into a single library, using the existing nvkm_falcon
2016 Oct 11
10
[PATCH 0/8] Secure Boot refactoring
Hi everyone, Apologies for the big patchset. This is a rework of the secure boot code that moves the building of the blob into its own set of source files (and own hooks), making the code more flexible and (hopefully) easier to understand as well. This rework is needed to support more signed firmware for existing and new chips. Since the firmwares in question are not available yet I cannot send
2016 Oct 27
15
[PATCH v2 00/14] Secure Boot refactoring
This is a rework of the secure boot code that moves the building of the blob into its own set of source files (and own hooks), making the code more flexible and (hopefully) easier to understand as well. This rework is needed to support more signed firmware for existing and new chips. Since the firmwares in question are not available yet I cannot send the code to manage then, but hopefully the
2016 Nov 02
15
[PATCH v3 00/15] Secure Boot refactoring
This is a rework of the secure boot code that moves the building of the blob into its own set of source files (and own hooks), making the code more flexible and (hopefully) easier to understand as well. This rework is needed to support more signed firmware for existing and new chips. Since the firmwares in question are not available yet I cannot send the code to manage then, but hopefully the
2016 Nov 21
33
[PATCH v4 0/33] Secure Boot refactoring / signed PMU firmware support for GM20B
This revision includes initial signed PMU firmware support for GM20B (Tegra X1). This PMU code will also be used as a basis for dGPU signed PMU firmware support. With the PMU code, the refactoring of secure boot should also make more sense. ACR (secure boot) support is now separated by the driver version it originates from. This separation allows to run any version of the ACR on any chip,