Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "nvdev_engine_ce0".
Did you mean:
nvdev_engine_ce2
2015 Feb 21
0
[PATCH] device/gm100: Basic GM206 bring up (as copy of GM204)
...+#if 0
+ device->oclass[NVDEV_ENGINE_FIFO ] = gk208_fifo_oclass;
+ device->oclass[NVDEV_ENGINE_SW ] = gf100_sw_oclass;
+ device->oclass[NVDEV_ENGINE_GR ] = gm107_gr_oclass;
+#endif
+ device->oclass[NVDEV_ENGINE_DISP ] = gm204_disp_oclass;
+#if 0
+ device->oclass[NVDEV_ENGINE_CE0 ] = &gm204_ce0_oclass;
+ device->oclass[NVDEV_ENGINE_CE1 ] = &gm204_ce1_oclass;
+ device->oclass[NVDEV_ENGINE_CE2 ] = &gm204_ce2_oclass;
+ device->oclass[NVDEV_ENGINE_MSVLD ] = &gk104_msvld_oclass;
+ device->oclass[NVDEV_ENGINE_MSPDEC ] = &gk104_mspdec_...
2015 Aug 31
8
[RFC PATCH v2 0/5] More explicit pushbuf error handling
Hi there,
Resending these now that they've had some more polish and testing, and I heard
that Ben's vacation is over :-)
These patches work as a starting point for more explicit error mechanisms and
better robustness. At the moment, when a job hangs or faults, it seems that
nouveau doesn't quite know how to handle the situation and often results in a
hang. Some of these situations