Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "nv98_bo_move_exec".
Did you mean:
nv84_bo_move_exec
2019 Dec 17
0
[PATCH] drm/nouveau: Fix ttm move init with multiple GPUs
...{
- static const struct {
+ static const struct _method_table {
const char *name;
int engine;
s32 oclass;
@@ -1192,7 +1192,8 @@ nouveau_bo_move_init(struct nouveau_drm *drm)
{ "M2MF", 0, 0x0039, nv04_bo_move_m2mf, nv04_bo_move_init },
{},
{ "CRYPT", 0, 0x88b4, nv98_bo_move_exec, nv50_bo_move_init },
- }, *mthd = _methods;
+ };
+ const struct _method_table *mthd = _methods;
const char *name = "CPU";
int ret;
--
2.17.1
2013 Dec 17
0
[Bug 58378] [NV86] Distorted graphics on NVIDIA GeForce 8400M G after upgrade the kernel to 3.7.0 version
...ot;, 0, 0x9039, nvc0_bo_move_m2mf, nvc0_bo_move_init },
{ "M2MF", 0, 0x5039, nv50_bo_move_m2mf, nv50_bo_move_init },
{ "M2MF", 0, 0x0039, nv04_bo_move_m2mf, nv04_bo_move_init },
{},
{ "CRYPT", 0, 0x88b4, nv98_bo_move_exec, nv50_bo_move_init },
}, *mthd = _methods;
what would be an equivalent change to a current kernel to roll back the effects
of the above forward patch?
Looking forward to your feedback...
Thanks a million & best regards,
Andreas
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the as...